Laminated bamboo (LB) represents a promising sustainable construction material, inheriting bamboo’s high strength, lightweight properties, and good ductility. However, the dimensional stability of mechanical performance—specifically size effects—remains a critical design challenge requiring systematic investigation. This study investigates the compression behavior of LB with tests of four specimen groups spanning volumes from 62,500 to 4,000,000 mm³ (25 × 25 × 100 mm to 100 × 100 × 400 mm). The research objectives encompass (i) characterizing compression behavior and failure mechanisms across different specimen scales, (ii) quantifying geometric and volumetric size effects on mechanical properties, (iii) evaluating theoretical frameworks for size effect prediction, (iv) developing progressive modeling approaches incorporating material heterogeneity, and (v) establishing design parameters for practical applications. Results demonstrate modest proportional size effects (1.60% strength reduction, 8.62% modulus reduction for 4× proportional scaling) but significant geometric optimization benefits, with cubic specimens achieving 15.78% higher strength and 25.11% greater modulus than equivalent-volume prismatic specimens. All specimens exhibited interfacial delamination failure with size-dependent crack propagation patterns. Theoretical analysis incorporates Weibull statistics, Bažant’s fracture mechanics, and Carpinteri’s fractal theory, with fracture energy modeling performing optimally. Three progressive modeling approaches achieve prediction accuracies ranging from 1.17% to 0.37% errors, with density-coupled modeling providing superior performance despite minimal density variations (COV = 9.27%). The research establishes size effect factors (0.86 for strength, 0.78 for modulus) and critical dimensions (125.64–126.14 mm), addressing critical gaps in LB size-dependent behavior. These parameters enable the development of reliable design methodologies for large-scale sustainable construction.

Laminated bamboo (LB) has shown enough exceptional performance to be used in constructions, but the performance of the bolted connections remains to be explored. To meet the criteria of low-carbon construction and fill the research gap in LB dowel embedment performance, this study examined the longitudinal dowel embedment behavior of LB. Failure modes, load–displacement curves, embedment strength, and elastic foundation parameters were examined after four sets of half-hole specimens with dowel diameters (6, 8, 10, and 12 mm) were tested in accordance with ISO 10984-2. The majority of the data was confirmed to follow a normal distribution by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Interlaminar shear failure (dominant in 10 and 12 mm groups) and local crushing (dominant in 6 and 8 mm groups) were the primary failure modes. There were clear linear and nonlinear phases in the load–displacement curves (excellent ductility). The average elastic foundation modulus was 3565.55 MPa (0.39 times the compressive modulus); meanwhile, the average proportional limit, yield, and ultimate strengths were 35.48, 63.08, and 74.44 MPa (0.59, 1.06, and 1.25 times the parallel-to-grain compressive strength). The ultimate strength varied from 72.64 MPa to 76.71 MPa as the diameter rose; however, the elastic foundation beam coefficient dropped significantly. A novel calculation based on LB’s parallel-to-grain compressive strength accorded well with test results, while the existing code formulae (GB 50005, NDS, and CSA O86) overestimated LB embedment strength. The design of LB bolted connections is guided by this study, which also explains LB embedment criteria and offers design parameters and a prediction method.