This study examines the conversion strategy of 2D to 3D cadastral maps by standardizing the height limits of land rights based on LU/LC. To achieve 3D cadastral maps, the research proposes a conversion strategy considering height factors. The height dimension of cadastral maps faces challenges in determining maximum heights for features like buildings, given varying regional regulations. As a solution, the concept of surface feature height (SFH) is applied along with LU/LC classification. Economic considerations, such as state revenue from taxes, are also factored into the proposed height limits. The results indicate that building/property heights in Bekasi Regency show significant development potential. In the residential sector, the maximum height reaches 24 m, lower than Bekasi City (48 m) and Bandung City (30 m). In the industrial sector, while heights can reach 25 m, the regulatory limit is only 9 m, posing challenges for investment. In the commercial sector, the maximum height can reach 45 m, but the low regulatory limit of 10 m restricts further development. This research provides a foundation for policy development and an effective 3D cadastral system, emphasizing the need for Bekasi Regency to re-evaluate its building height regulations to maximize its development potential.

Forensic cadastre is the application of forensic science in land dispute resolution to enhance the accuracy of analysis and the precision of recommendations. This study applied forensic science stages—recognition, identification, individualization, and evidence evaluation—to a land overlap dispute between state-owned land and privately owned parcels belonging to three individuals in Buntu Village, Ligung District, Majalengka Regency, West Java. Method validation was conducted through expert judgment using a questionnaire to assess its alignment with scientific and professional dispute resolution principles. The reliability test resulted in a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.855 for 10 questionnaire items, indicating a high level of internal consistency, while the validity reached 80%. These findings confirm that forensic cadastre has a strong conceptual validity and good reliability, making it an objective and transparent strategy for resolving land disputes that cannot be settled through traditional methods such as mediation.