Rong Zhang

Dr. Rong Zhang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 September 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RZRong Zhang
Rong Zhang
YZYihe Zhang
Yihe Zhang
GSGuoxing Sun
Guoxing Sun
HWHongqiang Wei
Hongqiang Wei
Infrastructure construction is a major contributor to carbon emissions, primarily due to the extensive use of mineral materials such as cement and aggregates, which release significant amounts of carbon dioxide during production and use. While existing research has predominantly centered on the applications of concrete, the present study extends the investigation to encompass inorganic–organic composites, alloy materials, and wastewater treatment systems, with particular attention to bridging the gap between theoretical potential and practical implementation. This study identifies China, the USA, and India as leaders in this field, attributing their progress to abundant material resources and sustained policy support. Key findings reveal that while geopolymers can fully replace cement, substitution rates of less than 50% are optimal for high-performance concrete to maintain structural integrity and decarbonization benefits. Aggregate replacements using materials such as air-cooled blast furnace slag show 50–100% feasibility. This review further highlights the multifunctional potential of red mud, rice husk ash, fly ash, and blast furnace slag as cement replacements, aggregates, reinforcers, catalysts, adsorbents, and composite fillers. However, challenges such as unstable raw material supply, lack of standardization, and insufficient international collaboration persist; these issues have often been overlooked in prior research and viable solutions have not been proposed. To address these barriers, a triple-objective framework is introduced in this study, integrating sustainable infrastructure, resource recycling, and environmental remediation, supported by optimized production processes and policy models from leading nations. Future research directions emphasize comprehensive life cycle assessments and enhanced global cooperation to bridge the divide between resource-rich and resource-scarce regions. By synthesizing cross-disciplinary applications and actionable solutions, this work advances the transition toward sustainable infrastructure systems.

18 August 2025 in Bulletin of Volcanology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RZRong Zhang
Rong Zhang
YYYuval Yagolnitzer
Yuval Yagolnitzer
MBMarco Brenna
Marco Brenna
JWJames D. L. White
James D. L. White
GKGabor Kereszturi
Gabor Kereszturi
SHSidney R. Hemming
Sidney R. Hemming

21 May 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJiajun He
Jiajun He
AKAmjad Khalid
Amjad Khalid
RZRong Zhang
Rong Zhang
TZTingting Zhang
Tingting Zhang
This study evaluates how environmental regulation influences enterprise management practices in the YREB of China, which faces a dilemma between economic growth and ecological conservation. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines, a qualitative systematic review of empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 was conducted. The data were retrieved via Web of Science and Scopus, supplemented by Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. Subsequently, thematic analysis and data visualization were conducted by MAXQDA 2024. The findings synthesize evidence across key themes, environmental information disclosure (EID), green innovation, governance adaptation, and regional disparity themes to synthesize key empirical findings. From the perspectives of Institutional Theory and Stakeholder Theory, the findings suggest that environmental regulation is not only a compliance burden, but also a force for enterprise change, driving EID practices and innovation-oriented competitive advantages. The results further suggest that when institutions are more developed or policy implementation is more stable, enterprises are better able to adjust, implying that downstream regions are more flexible than upstream regions. Other instruments to close the implementation gap and support sustainable development are multi-level governance, context-specific policy instruments, and Integrated Water Resource Management. Also, it may be highlighted that effectiveness in environmental governance relies on governance quality, institutional capacities, and regionally differentiated aspects. Future research should better identify causal mechanisms and improve cross-region learning to improve equitable and effective environmental governance in China’s evolving socio-ecological context.