Pang bing Wu

Pang bing Wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 September 2025 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LXLiu Xuchu
Liu Xuchu
LLLi Lingyuan
Li Lingyuan
PWPang bing Wu
Pang bing Wu
WXWang Xuemeng
Wang Xuemeng
LGLiu Gaigai
Liu Gaigai
Based on an adapted monetary incentive delay task, this study involved 81 participants from China, including 40 from Experiment 1 and 41 from Experiment 2, we conducted behavioral experiments across two distinct gain conditions: one with an unknown expected return and the another with a fixed expected return. Our objective was to examine the effects of investment cost and reward-punishment cues on performance in a simple cognitive task. The findings from Experiment 1 revealed that reward cues significantly promoted individual behavioral performance.In Experiment 2, a significant main effect of investment cost was observed, with individuals facing lower investment costs showing better performance and higher payoffs under equivalent reward-punishment cue conditions.

19 May 2026 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPang bing Wu
Pang bing Wu
东李东泽 李
东泽 李
KCKaiming Chen
Kaiming Chen
LLLuguang Luo
Luguang Luo
XFXinmiao Feng
Xinmiao Feng
JWJiezhong Wu
Jiezhong Wu
Objective: This study assessed the blood-pressure effects of various exercise regimens in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes, considering baseline levels, to clarify dose–response relationships for personalized exercise guidance. Methods: We conducted a dose–response network meta-analysis. Systematic searches were performed in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library. Baseline blood pressure was modelled as an explanatory variable via meta-regression. Thirty-six eligible RCTs of physical-activity interventions in older adults with type 2 diabetes reporting blood-pressure outcomes were included. Results: In stage 1–2 hypertension, mind–body activities were associated with the greatest systolic blood-pressure reduction and appear to be the most effective intervention based on available evidence. For diastolic blood pressure, combined aerobic-resistance training was effective in stage 1 hypertension. Dose–response analysis indicated that clinically meaningful reductions occur at modest volumes (668 and 657 MET-min/week for systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively), aligning with the lower end of international activity guidelines. Conclusions: Individualized exercise prescription based on baseline blood pressure may offer a useful non-pharmacological strategy for hypertension management in older adults with type 2 diabetes. By quantifying the required activity dose, this work provides an evidence base for integrating structured exercise into precision care for this high-risk population.