In eukaryotes, three-dimensional (3D) chromatin architecture maintains genome stability and is important in regulating gene transcription. However, little is known about the mechanisms by which diverse ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes regulate the 3D chromatin structure in plants. We examined the 3D chromatin structure within the ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF, ISWI, INO80, and CHD remodeling complexes in wild-type (WT) and mutant Arabidopsis thaliana plants by combining high-throughput sequencing with in situ Hi-C, the enrichment of histone marks, nucleosome density, and gene expression. We found that compartment regions switched and compartmental strength was significantly weakened in all four enzyme mutants. Chromatin remodeling complexes differentially regulated the nucleosome distribution pattern and density within the switching compartments. Alterations of nucleosome distribution pattern and density were associated with a reduction in H3K27me3 levels in the chromatin remodeling enzyme mutants and led to compartment switching. Our data show that chromatin remodeling complexes regulate the linear nucleosome distribution pattern and density to promote H3K27me3 deposition, which in turn regulates 3D chromatin structure.
Three-dimensional (3D) chromatin organization is highly dynamic during development and seems to play a crucial role in regulating gene expression. Self-interacting domains, commonly called topologically associating domains (TADs) or compartment domains (CDs), have been proposed as the basic structural units of chromatin organization. Surprisingly, although these units have been found in several plant species, they escaped detection in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Here, we show that the Arabidopsis genome is partitioned into contiguous CDs with different epigenetic features, which are required to maintain appropriate intra-CD and long-range interactions. Consistent with this notion, the histone-modifying Polycomb group machinery is involved in 3D chromatin organization. Yet, while it is clear that Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2)-mediated trimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) helps establish local and long-range chromatin interactions in plants, the implications of PRC1-mediated histone H2A monoubiquitination on lysine 121 (H2AK121ub) are unclear. We found that PRC1, together with PRC2, maintains intra-CD interactions, but it also hinders the formation of H3K4me3-enriched local chromatin loops when acting independently of PRC2. Moreover, the loss of PRC1 or PRC2 activity differentially affects long-range chromatin interactions, and these 3D changes differentially affect gene expression. Our results suggest that H2AK121ub helps prevent the formation of transposable element/H3K27me1-rich long loops and serves as a docking point for H3K27me3 incorporation.
PWWP-DOMAIN INTERACTOR OF POLYCOMBS (PWO) family proteins play a vital role in regulating plant development. However, the molecular mechanisms of how PWOs regulate chromatin structure is elusive. Our data show that the PWO1 binding sites are enriched with positive modifications but exclusive with H3K27me3. Moreover, PWO1 binds to the H3K27me3-enriched compartment domain (H3K27me3-CD) boundary regions, and functions to maintain the boundary strength. Meanwhile, we found that PWOs and Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) function parallelly in maintaining H3K27me3-CDs’ structure. Loss of either PWOs or PRC2 leads to H3K27me3-CD strength reduction, B to A compartment switching as well as the H3K27me3-CD relocating away from the nuclear periphery. Additionally, PWOs and lamin-like proteins collaborate to regulate multiple chromatin structures to repress gene transcription within H3K27me3-CDs. We conclude that PWOs maintain H3K27me3-CDs’ repressive state and regulate their spatial position in the nucleus.
The two multi-subunit complexes, Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 and 2 (PRC1/2), act synergistically during development to maintain the gene silencing state among different species. In contrast with mammals and Drosophila melanogaster, the enzyme activities and components of the PRC1 complex in plants are not fully conserved. In addition, the mutual recruitment of PRC1 and PRC2 in plants differs from that observed in mammals and Drosophila. Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins and their catalytic activity play an indispensable role in transcriptional regulation, developmental processes, and the maintenance of cellular identity. In plants, PRC1 and PRC2 deposit H2Aub and H3K27me3, respectively, and also play an important role in influencing three-dimensional (3D) chromatin structure. With the development of high-throughput sequencing techniques and computational biology, remarkable progress has been made in the field of plant 3D chromatin structure, and PcG has been found to be involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression by mediating the formation of 3D chromatin structures. At the same time, some genetic evidence indicates that PcG enables plants to better adapt to and resist a wide range of stresses by dynamically regulating gene expression. In the following review, we focus on the recruitment relationship between PRC1 and PRC2, the crucial role of PcG enzyme activity, the effect of PcG on 3D chromatin structure, and the vital role of PcG in environmental stress in plants.