Mark Cummings

Mr. Mark Cummings

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2021 in The Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAltamash S. Hassan
Altamash S. Hassan
MFMelissa E. Fajardo
Melissa E. Fajardo
MCMark Cummings
Mark Cummings
LMLaura Miller McPherson
Laura Miller McPherson
FNFrancesco Negro
Francesco Negro
GPGregory Pearcey
Gregory Pearcey

22 November 2023 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JBJames A. Beauchamp
James A. Beauchamp
AHAltamash S. Hassan
Altamash S. Hassan
LMLaura M. McPherson
Laura M. McPherson
FNFrancesco Negro
Francesco Negro
GPGregory Pearcey
Gregory Pearcey
JDJulius Dewald
Julius Dewald
Following a hemiparetic stroke, individuals exhibit altered motor unit firing patterns during voluntary muscle contractions, including impairments in firing rate modulation and recruitment. These individuals also exhibit abnormal muscle coactivation through multi-joint synergies (e.g., flexion synergy). Here, we investigate whether motor unit firing activity during flexion synergy-driven contractions of the paretic biceps brachii differs from that of voluntary contractions and use these differences to predict changes in descending motor commands. To accomplish this, we characterized motor unit firing patterns of the biceps brachii in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke during voluntary isometric elbow flexion contractions in the paretic and non-paretic limbs, as well as during contractions driven by voluntary effort and by flexion synergy expression in the paretic limb. We observed significant reductions in motor unit firing rate modulation from the non-paretic to paretic limb (non-paretic – paretic: 0.14 pps/%MVT, 95% CI: [0.09 0.19]) that were further reduced during synergy-driven contractions (voluntary paretic – synergy driven: 0.19 pps/%MVT, 95% CI: [0.14 0.25]). Moreover, using recently developed metrics, we evaluated how a stroke-induced reliance on indirect motor pathways alters the inputs that motor units receive and revealed progressive increases in neuromodulatory and inhibitory drive to the motor pool in the paretic limb, with the changes greatest during synergy-driven contractions. These findings suggest that an interplay between heightened neuromodulatory drive and alterations in inhibitory command structure may account for the observed motor unit impairments, further illuminating underlying neural mechanisms involved in the flexion synergy and its impact on motor unit firing patterns post-stroke.

27 March 2025 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PVPrasad S. Vannemreddy
Prasad S. Vannemreddy
MCMark Cummings
Mark Cummings
RBRomana V Bahrii
Romana V Bahrii
Konstantin SlavinKonstantin Slavin
Konstantin Slavin
Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke is a devastating neurological condition with dismal prognosis associated with recurrent episodes that further damage the neuronal networks, thus disabling neuronal plasticity. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used in clinical practice to treat epilepsy for several decades and is well accepted as a safe procedure devoid of serious adverse events. Bailey and Bremer demonstrated that VNS has the capabilities to stimulate neuronal pathways that enhance the recovery of damaged cerebral function. Further studies have strengthened these observations, while technology has improved the tolerability of implants, resulting in VNS applications for epilepsy. Several animal models on neural plasticity have improved our understanding of VNS and its ability to provide neuromodulation to improve recovery in stroke patients. The closed-loop stimulation of the vagus nerve with individualized stimulation parameters combined with physical therapy appears to be an attractive option today. VNS is also being tested as a noninvasive trans-cutaneous modality to further improve patient acceptance and tolerability. However, the implantation of VNS is yielding desirable outcomes and appears to be a more reliable treatment for stroke rehabilitation in clinical trials.


1 October 2023 in Motor Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMark Cummings
Mark Cummings
ADAditi Doshi
Aditi Doshi
SMSangeetha Madhavan
Sangeetha Madhavan
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to facilitate motor performance in healthy individuals; however, results are variable. The neuromodulatory effects of tDCS during visuomotor tasks may be influenced by extrinsic visual feedback. However, this interaction between tDCS and visual feedback has not been explored for the lower limb. Hence, our objective was to explore if tDCS over the primary lower limb motor cortex differentially facilitates motor performance based on the availability of visual feedback. Methods: Twenty-two neurotypical adults performed ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion movements while tracking a sinusoidal target. Spatiotemporal, spatial, and temporal error were calculated between the ankle position and target. Participants attended two sessions, a week apart, with (Stim) and without (No-Stim) anodal tDCS. Sessions were divided into two blocks containing randomized visual feedback conditions: full, no, and blindfold. During Stim sessions, the first block included the application of tDCS to the lower limb M1. Results: Spatiotemporal and spatial error increased as feedback faded (p < .001). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant interaction between tDCS and visual feedback (p < .05) on spatiotemporal error. Post hoc analyses revealed a significant improvement in spatiotemporal error when visual feedback was absent (p < .01). Spatial and temporal errors were not significantly affected by stimulation or visual feedback. Discussion: Our results suggest that tDCS enhances spatiotemporal ankle motor performance only when visual feedback is not available. These findings indicate that visual feedback may play an important role in demonstrating the effectiveness of tDCS.

11 June 2022 in Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MCMark Cummings
Mark Cummings
SPSonia Pradhan
Sonia Pradhan
SMSangeetha Madhavan
Sangeetha Madhavan
Individuals with stroke face a distinct set of challenges, barriers and facilitators that need to be understood to streamline efficacy of stroke clinical trials and improve participant retention. Few long-term stroke rehabilitation trials have evaluated participant perception of their laboratory experience. We collected data regarding trial satisfaction from 33 individuals with stroke who participated in 12 sessions of treadmill training which included pre, post and follow-up non-invasive brain stimulation and clinical assessments. We evaluated factors such as overall trial satisfaction, burden of testing, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and perceived support using a participant satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) that assessed participants’ overall trial experience. 97% of our participants found participating in the study to be rewarding and would recommend it to other persons with stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) testing was found to be the major perceived burden of participation while travelling to the lab was found to be the major perceived barrier to participation. Significant correlations were found between various items of the PSQ and clinical assessments. This study helped us get a preliminary perspective into the benefits and barriers faced by persons with stroke enrolled in a 4-week long clinical trial. We observed that participant satisfaction was driven by various factors including functional status, personal relevance to the research, perceptive physical and mental health improvements, interaction with research personnel, and ease of testing protocols.