Birgitta Knudsen

Prof. Birgitta Knudsen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2002 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMorten O. Christensen
Morten O. Christensen
MLMorten K. Larsen
Morten K. Larsen
HBHans Ullrich Barthelmes
Hans Ullrich Barthelmes
RHRobert Hock
Robert Hock
CAClaus Lindbjerg Andersen
Claus Lindbjerg Andersen
CMChristian Mielke
Christian Mielke
DNA topoisomerase (topo) II catalyses topological genomic changes essential for many DNA metabolic processes. It is also regarded as a structural component of the nuclear matrix in interphase and the mitotic chromosome scaffold. Mammals have two isoforms (α and β) with similar properties in vitro. Here, we investigated their properties in living and proliferating cells, stably expressing biofluorescent chimera of the human isozymes. Topo IIα and IIβ behaved similarly in interphase but differently in mitosis, where only topo IIα was chromosome associated to a major part. During interphase, both isozymes joined in nucleolar reassembly and accumulated in nucleoli, which seemed not to involve catalytic DNA turnover because treatment with teniposide (stabilizing covalent catalytic DNA intermediates of topo II) relocated the bulk of the enzymes from the nucleoli to nucleoplasmic granules. Photobleaching revealed that the entire complement of both isozymes was completely mobile and free to exchange between nuclear subcompartments in interphase. In chromosomes, topo IIα was also completely mobile and had a uniform distribution. However, hypotonic cell lysis triggered an axial pattern. These observations suggest that topo II is not an immobile, structural component of the chromosomal scaffold or the interphase karyoskeleton, but rather a dynamic interaction partner of such structures.

29 October 2013 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSissel Juul
Sissel Juul
Federico IacovelliFederico Iacovelli
Federico Iacovelli
Mattia FalconiMattia Falconi
Mattia Falconi
SKSofie L. Kragh
Sofie L. Kragh
BCBrian Christensen
Brian Christensen
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen

24 February 1997 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKay N. Meyer
Kay N. Meyer
EKEigil Kjeldsen
Eigil Kjeldsen
Tobias StraubTobias Straub
Tobias Straub
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen
IHIan D. Hickson
Ian D. Hickson
FBFritz Boege
Fritz Boege
We visualized DNA topoisomerases in A431 cells and isolated chromosomes by isoenzyme-selective immunofluorescence microscopy. In interphase, topoisomerase I mainly had a homogeneous nuclear distribution. 10–15% of the cells exhibited granular patterns, 30% showed bright intranucleolar patches. Topoisomerase II isoenzymes showed spotted (α) or reticular (β) nuclear patterns throughout interphase. In contrast to topoisomerase IIα, topoisomerase IIβ was completely excluded from nucleoli. In mitosis, topoisomerase IIβ diffused completely into the cytosol, whereas topoisomerases I and IIα remained chromosome bound. Chromosomal staining of topoisomerase I was homogeneous, whereas topoisomerase IIα accumulated in the long axes of the chromosome arms and in the centriols. Topoisomerase antigens were 2–3-fold higher in mitosis than in interphase, but specific activities of topoisomerase I and II were reduced 5- and 2.4-fold, respectively. These changes were associated with mitotic enzyme hyperphosphorylation. In interphase, topoisomerases could be completely linked to DNA by etoposide or camptothecin, whereas in mitosis, 50% of topoisomerase IIα escaped poisoning. Refractoriness to etoposide could be assigned to the salt-stable scaffold fraction of topoisomerase IIα, which increased from <2% in G1 phase to 48% in mitosis. Topoisomerases I and IIβ remained completely extractable throughout the cell cycle. In summary, expression of topoisomerases increases towards mitosis, but specific activities decrease. Topoisomerase IIβ is released from the heterochromatin, whereas topoisomerase I and IIα remain chromosome bound. Scaffold-associated topoisomerase IIα appears not to be involved in catalytic DNA turnover, though it may play a role in the replicational cycle of centriols, where it accumulates during M phase.

20 December 2007 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFelicie F. Andersen
Felicie F. Andersen
BKBjarne Knudsen
Bjarne Knudsen
COCristiano Luis Pinto De Oliveira
Cristiano Luis Pinto De Oliveira
RFRikke F. Frøhlich
Rikke F. Frøhlich
DKDinna Krüger
Dinna Krüger
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen
The inherent properties of DNA as a stable polymer with unique affinity for partner molecules determined by the specific Watson–Crick base pairing makes it an ideal component in self-assembling structures. This has been exploited for decades in the design of a variety of artificial substrates for investigations of DNA-interacting enzymes. More recently, strategies for synthesis of more complex two-dimensional (2D) and 3D DNA structures have emerged. However, the building of such structures is still in progress and more experiences from different research groups and different fields of expertise are necessary before complex DNA structures can be routinely designed for the use in basal science and/or biotechnology. Here we present the design, construction and structural analysis of a covalently closed and stable 3D DNA structure with the connectivity of an octahedron, as defined by the double-stranded DNA helices that assembles from eight oligonucleotides with a yield of ∼30%. As demonstrated by Small Angle X-ray Scattering and cryo-Transmission Electron Microscopy analyses the eight-stranded DNA structure has a central cavity larger than the apertures in the surrounding DNA lattice and can be described as a nano-scale DNA cage, Hence, in theory it could hold proteins or other bio-molecules to enable their investigation in certain harmful environments or even allow their organization into higher order structures.

26 May 2016 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GVGiulia Vindigni
Giulia Vindigni
SRSofia Raniolo
Sofia Raniolo
AOAlessio Ottaviani
Alessio Ottaviani
Mattia FalconiMattia Falconi
Mattia Falconi
OFOskar Franch
Oskar Franch
SBSilvia Biocca
Silvia Biocca

2 November 2012 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSissel Juul
Sissel Juul
CNChristine J. F. Nielsen
Christine J. F. Nielsen
RLRodrigo Labouriau
Rodrigo Labouriau
ARAmit Roy
Amit Roy
CTCinzia Tesauro
Cinzia Tesauro
BKBirgitta Knudsen
Birgitta Knudsen