Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a type of diabetes diagnosed during pregnancy and its prevalence is on the rise around the world. GDM increases the risk of serious adverse health outcomes for the mother and child. Multiple types of non-pharmacological interventions have been developed for the management and prevention of GDM; however, there is a lack of clarity regarding their effectiveness. Objective: To summarize the evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in the management and prevention of GDM. Methods: For this integrative review, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The methodology followed the integrative approach outlined by Whittemore and Knafl’s, and study quality was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. Results: A total of 44 relevant studies were included. Key themes identified for GDM management were (1) nutrition therapy and physical activity, (2) social and psychological support, (3) digital tools, and (4) barriers and facilitators. For GDM prevention, themes were categorized into individual-level approaches, (5) lifestyle and supplements, and population-level approaches: (6) environmental factors, and (7) health in all policies. Conclusions: The growing prevalence of GDM is a major public health concern that requires the implementation of effective multi-level evidence-based strategies. Environmental, socioeconomic, and racial determinants of health have substantial impacts on GDM, highlighting the need to address the root causes of the illness. Further research is needed to support effective preventive and management measures beyond standard pharmacological treatment, so that evidence-based solutions can be applied to enhance and safeguard the health of current and future generations.

Background: Immigration is a key factor contributing to population growth in Canada, a trend that is expected to continue. Immigrants generally arrive with better health than the Canadian-born population, but this advantage often diminishes over time, partially due to dietary acculturation. Emerging evidence points to a bidirectional link between nutrition and mental health. Objective: To explore the bidirectional relationship between nutrition and mental health and its impact on the health of Canadian immigrants, with a specific focus on immigrants’ mental health and the healthy immigrant effect. Methods: For this integrative review, two comprehensive literature searches were conducted in the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to July 2024. The review adhered to Whittemore and Knafl’s integrative methodology, with the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool used to assess the quality of the studies. Results: A total of 42 and 34 scientific articles were included from the first and second literature searches, respectively. Four main themes emerged from the literature: (1) food insecurity and mental health, (2) obesity and mental health, (3) diet quality and mental health, and (4) the gut microbiome and mental health. These themes were explored in the context of Canadian immigrants’ health. Conclusions: The health of immigrants to Canada is likely shaped by complex, bidirectional interactions among various determinants of health, influencing both physical and mental well-being. As newcomers are expected to form an increasing proportion of the Canadian population, further research is needed to understand how the interaction between nutrition and mental health can help promote and safeguard the health of Canadian immigrants.

Background: Women are disproportionately affected by depression and generalized anxiety disorder compared to men throughout their lives. Hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, postpartum, and menopause are often associated with mood disturbances. Evidence suggests that modulating the gut microbiome through gut-targeted interventions may offer a novel therapeutic approach for various mental health conditions. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of gut microbiome-targeted interventions in improving mental health symptoms in women during key hormonal transitions. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from inception to August 2025 across Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, FSTA, CENTRAL, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Methodological quality was evaluated using Cochrane’s risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0). Statistical analyses were performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 4). Results: Eleven RCTs were included, of which eight were used in the meta-analyses. Gut microbiome-targeted interventions significantly reduced depressive symptoms (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = −0.848; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −1.470 to −0.226; p = 0.008) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = −0.997; 95% CI: −1.684 to −0.311; p = 0.004) versus controls. Heterogeneity was high (depression: Cochran’s Q = 87.1, I² = 92%, τ² = 0.729; anxiety: Q = 35.3, I² = 89%, τ² = 0.535), but sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. Meta-regressions indicated that treatment duration was not a significant moderator (depression: p = 0.12; anxiety: p = 0.28). Conclusions: Gut-targeted interventions significantly reduced symptoms of both depression and anxiety, highlighting their potential as complementary therapeutic strategies for managing mood disorders in women across hormonal life stages. However, high heterogeneity limits the ability to determine optimal standardized clinical recommendations, highlighting the need for further research to guide clinical applications and inform individualized approaches to treatment.