Background/Objectives: Bone nonunion remains a clinical challenge in orthopedic surgery with significant impacts on mental and physical wellbeing for patients. There are several previously established risk factors of nonunion that are connected to nutrition, but this has yet to be substantially explored. This review seeks to assess all studies that present associations between nutrition and nonunion to understand the potential for clinical relevance in nonunion prevention. Methods: Case–control and cohort studies comparing nonunion risk based on nutritional factors were gathered through PubMed in July 2024. Data were extracted with dual verification through Covidence and assessed for bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of 21 studies were included in this literature review. Vitamin D deficiency was a significant risk factor of nonunion in six studies and not significant in six other studies. Albumin was significant in three of the five studies addressing this lab value. Iron deficiency anemia was significant in a study assessing its impact on nonunion. Calcium was not significant in the one study mentioned. ICD-10-coded malnutrition was significant in one of the two studies. Sarcopenia, nutritional care plans, and dietitian-diagnosed malnutrition were statistically significant clinical indicators for predicting nonunion, but food insecurity was insignificant. Conclusions: Vitamin D, calcium, albumin, iron deficiency anemia, sarcopenia, and clinically diagnosed malnutrition have all been associated with an increased risk of nonunion in observational studies and should be considered when preventing nonunion development.

Background: Our objective was to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the treatment of acute lower extremity fractures in persons with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Information from a previous systematic review that addressed lower extremity fracture care in persons with an SCI as well as information from interviews of physical and occupational therapists, searches of the literature, and expert opinion were used to develop this CPG. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to determine the quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendations. An overall GRADE quality rating was applied to the evidence. Conclusions: Individuals with a chronic SCI who sustain an acute lower extremity fracture should be provided with education regarding the risks and benefits of operative and nonoperative management, and shared decision-making for acute fracture management should be used. Nonoperative management historically has been the default preference; however, with the advent of greater patient independence, improved surgical techniques, and advanced therapeutics and rehabilitation, increased use of surgical management should be considered. Physical therapists, kinesiotherapists, and/or occupational therapists should assess equipment needs, skills training, and caregiver assistance due to changes in mobility resulting from a lower extremity fracture. Therapists should be involved in fracture management as soon as possible following fracture identification. Pressure injuries, compartment syndrome, heterotopic ossification, nonunion, malunion, thromboembolism, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia are fracture-related complications that clinicians caring for patients who have an SCI and a lower extremity fracture may encounter. Strategies for their treatment are discussed. The underlying goal is to return the patient as closely as possible to their pre-fracture functional level with operative or nonoperative management.

Introduction: Surgical training using simulation can fill gaps in traditional surgical residency learning. We hypothesize that arthroscopy training conducted on a virtual reality simulator will be preferred by orthopaedic surgery residents over a traditional dry lab simulation model. Methods: 38 orthopaedic surgery residents at a single U.S. residency program were randomized to train for a shoulder arthroscopy procedure using either a virtual reality simulator or a table-top dry lab simulator. Training and learning preferences were then asked of the resident participants. Results: Junior residents were likely to report training preference for the virtual reality simulator compared to senior residents [15/24 (62.5%) v. 8/14 (57.1%); P = .043]. Simulator preference was not influenced by subspecialty interest, prior arthroscopy experience, or simulator experience. Virtual reality simulation was associated with positive attitude towards arthroscopy and high chance of reporting learning gains on general arthroscopic understanding. Senior residents were 4.7 times more likely than juniors to report learning gains via staff discussion pre- and post-operatively. A majority of residents [34/38 (89.5%)] reported, however, wanting more simulation for training surgical skills. Conclusion: Simulation is a desired and potentially valuable adjunct to training orthopaedic residents in arthroscopy. Training needs do evolve; and junior arthroscopists may benefit more from virtual reality platforms for general skills. Senior residents preferred dry lab simulation, possibly because it allowed for handling of actual instruments and implants.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to cytokines and the phenomenon of cytokine storm into mainstream discussions. In this disease specifically, a cytokine storm overwhelming immune response contributes to the pathophysiology and mortality of the COVID-19 infection. Analogous perturbed immune reactions are experienced in polytrauma patients, compromising local tissue healing while threatening multiple organ systems. The expanding field of osteoimmunology should contribute to the orthopaedic community's understanding of how the immune system response, whether normal or pathologic, affects the whole body outcome of our patients.

Purpose: Over 60% of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans access Veterans Administration (VA) health care after military service. The purpose of this research is to describe the types of musculoskeletal service-connected disabilities distributed among these veterans. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 383,757 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans were searched for service-connected disability determinations using the Veterans Services Network Corporate Master File (VETSNET). Service-connected disabilities were grouped according to the types of diagnoses represented. Results: Of 383,757 included veterans, 347,643 (90.6%) had at least one musculoskeletal-related service-connected disability. The most common group of musculoskeletal disabilities was conditions of the spine, affecting 241, 636 (69.5%) veterans, limitations in the knee/leg motion (46.6%) and acute and chronic disorders (30.2%). The median number of musculoskeletal conditions contributing to the service connected disability per veteran was 2.8 ± 1.3 conditions. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder was the most common primary service connected disability for both men and women. Discussion: Musculoskeletal conditions as a source of service connected disability affects 90% of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan. While the primary source of service connected disability is most often not musculoskeletal related, the overall burden of musculoskeletal conditions is very high with an average of 2.8 musculoskeletal conditions per veteran contributing to their disability.

Objectives: To evaluate rates of nonunion repair, osseous healing, and outcomes in femoral nonunions with contemporary healing. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Five academic level 1 trauma centers. Patients/Participants: This study includes adult patients (age older than 18) seen at one of the participating institutions between 2012 and 2019 who sustained a femur fracture (OTA/AO 31, 32, 33) initially treated with intramedullary fixation that developed nonunion and were treated with exchange nailing for the index nonunion surgery. Seventy-nine patients with femoral nonunion met inclusion criteria. Intervention: Exchange nailing for treatment of femoral nonunion. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was radiographic osseous union. We further analyzed union rates by OTA/AO classification, nonunion type, implants used, graft used, time from the initial procedure, and infection status. Results: Seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Rates of osseous union were similar by OTA/AO classification (P = 0.48), nonunion type (hypertrophic, oligotrophic, atrophic) (P = 0.52), implant/biologic used (P = 0.45), and time from the initial procedure until exchange nail procedure (P = 0.09). Forty-two patients had inflammatory laboratory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentary rate) and cultures obtained during the first nonunion surgery with no significant differences in union (P = 0.29) based on laboratory and culture results. However, a considerable number of complications were encountered (n = 32; 41%). Common complications included reoperation (n = 30; 38%) secondary to recalcitrant nonunion, readmission, implant failure, and infection. Conclusions: This large, multicenter study with modern implants, instruments, and techniques for exchange nailing of femoral nonunions demonstrates high rates of reoperation (n = 30; 38%), but higher rates of osseous healing (n = 68; 86% healed) than previously reported data in the literature. Level of Evidence: III.