Fiber-reinforced composites are used as restorative materials for prosthetic oral rehabilitation. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an accustomed affection with various oral manifestations. This study aimed to evaluate the behavior of two high-performance CAD/CAM milled reinforced composites (Trinia™, TriLor) in artificial saliva at different pH levels through immersion tests, and to determine if changes in mass or surface morphology at variable pH, specific for patients affected by GERD, appear. After investigating the elemental composition and surface morphology, the specimens were immersed in Carter Brugirard artificial saliva for 21 days at different pH values (5.7, 7.6, and varying the pH from 5.7 to 3). The values of the weighed masses during the immersion tests were statistically processed in terms of mean and standard deviation. Results suggested that irrespective of the medium pH, the two composites presented a similar mass variation in the range of −0.18 (±0.01)–1.82 (±0.02) mg after immersion, suggesting their stability when in contact with artificial saliva, an aspect which was also highlighted by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis performed on the immersed surfaces. Novel composite biomaterials can be a proper alternative for metal alloys used for prosthetic frameworks in patients suffering from GERD.

Mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the bone marrow have a great differentiation potential, being able to produce many cell lines, including osteoblasts. Osteoblasts have an important role in bone remodeling by actively participating in the maturation and mineralization of the extracellular matrix. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of laser application on the viability and proliferation of osteoblasts. Methods: Alveolar bone was harvested from 8 patients and placed into a culture medium to induce proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. These were differentiated into osteoblasts in special conditions. The cells from each patient were split into two groups, one was treated using a 980 nm laser (1W output power, pulsed mode, 20 s, 50 mm distance) (laser “+”) and the other one did not receive laser stimulation (laser “-”). Results: Using the confocal microscope, we determined that the cells from the laser “+” group were more active when compared to the laser “-” group. The number of cells in the laser “+” group was significantly greater compared to the laser “-” group as the ImageJ-NIH software showed (p = 0.0072). Conclusions: Laser application increases the proliferation rate of osteoblasts and intensifies their cellular activity.

Orthodontic treatment with fixed devices should only be indicated in case of a stable, non-active periodontal disease status. Throughout orthodontic treatment, a careful assessment of the periodontal status is advised. Due to its anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects, laser therapy is frequently used as an adjunct to classic periodontal therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages and limitations of the use of laser therapy on periodontal status during orthodontic treatment. Throughout the 9 months during which this placebo-controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted, 32 patients were included in the study, divided into two groups: microscope “+” (patients who observed the bacteria within the dental plaque-sample examination on the screen of a dark-field microscope in real time) and microscope “−” (patients who did not see the oral pathogens using a dark-field microscope). For all patients, using the split-mouth study design, laser therapy was applied to one hemiarch (HL), whereas the other hemiarch received treatment without active light (HC). After one month, by analyzing the main indicators of periodontal health status, we found that the plaque index (PI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) values were significantly decreased after receiving treatment (for PI: HL-p = 0.0005, HC-p = 0.0297; for BOP: HL-p = 0.0121, HC-p = 0.0236), whereas the probing-depth (PD) values remained almost the same as before treatment (HL-p = 1.5143; HC-p = 1.4762). Conclusions: The use of the dark-field microscope proved to be beneficial in sensitizing patients to the presence of bacteria in the oral cavity and motivated them to strictly follow the rules of oral hygiene. Laser treatment can be a valuable aid in periodontal therapy, but only in adjunction with mechanical therapy.

Background: Changes in the positions of teeth occur during orthodontic treatment due to the application of forces that cause restructuring of the periodontal tissue. In the last decade, substantial research has been conducted to detect different biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) to obtain a better assessment of the periodontal status. Aim: The purpose of this review is to describe how the levels of certain biomarkers from the gingival fluid change during tissue remodeling throughout orthodontic treatment. Materials and methods: To carry out the purpose of this research, electronic databases were searched using specific keywords, leading to 387 articles, out of which 19 were used in writing this narrative review. A sampling period of the last 10 years was used in selecting the articles. Results: The results highlight that the origin of the gingival crevicular fluid is at the gingival blood vessels’ plexus. GCF has a complex composition with differences depending on the periodontal status and the tissue restructuring which takes place in the periodontium. The levels of inflammatory mediators, enzymes, and metabolic products of tissue remodeling in GCF change during orthodontic treatment. Being aware of their specific role, they can provide valuable information about bone remodeling during orthodontic tooth movement. Conclusions: By determining the biomarkers in GCF, as an investigative method, clinicians could easily monitor the orthodontic tooth movement, and, subsequently, the treatment period could be shortened and the adverse effects associated with it could be avoided.

Background/Objectives: Periodontal regeneration remains a primary goal in contemporary periodontal therapy, aiming to restore both the structural and functional integrity of tissues lost due to periodontitis. Recent advancements in biomaterials, growth factors, and biologically active matrices have expanded the therapeutic possibilities in clinical practice. This narrative review aimed to summarize recent developments in regenerative approaches in periodontology, emphasizing their biological principles, clinical outcomes, and current limitations. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed Central and Scopus for randomized controlled trials and clinical trials published between January 2015 and July 2025. Human studies in English, available in open access and evaluating periodontal regenerative approaches, were included, while animal, in vitro, and non-clinical studies were excluded. A total of 67 articles met the eligibility criteria. Data were synthesized in both tabular and narrative form. Results: Most trials reported clinically relevant improvements in probing depth reduction, clinical attachment gain, and defect fill when regenerative biomaterials were applied in appropriately selected intrabony defects, although outcomes varied according to defect morphology, surgical protocol, and patient-related factors. Conclusions: Although substantial progress has been made, true periodontal regeneration remains challenging. Regenerative techniques such as GTR/GBR, EMD, platelet concentrates, and hyaluronic acid show favorable outcomes in appropriately selected cases, although overall predictability remains limited by variability in study design and short follow-up periods. High-quality, standardized RCTs are needed to consolidate current evidence and support guideline-based clinical decision-making.

(1) Background: Early diagnosis and treatment of peri-implant mucositis may reduce inflammatory markers and halt the progression of the condition to peri-implantitis. Adjunctive laser treatment may have therapeutic benefits that are not yet well known. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages and limitations of laser therapy as an adjuvant in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. (2) Methods: A total of 42 patients with at least 2 implants situated in different hemiarches were included in this study and divided into two groups: G1 (received laser therapy) and G2 (no laser therapy). Periodontal health status indices were recorded at the initial moment (T0), and all patients underwent non-surgical debridement therapy accompanied by oral hygiene training. In patients from group G1, one implant site received adjuvant laser therapy (subgroup IL), and the other one did not receive active laser light (IC). The plaque index (PI), probing pocket depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) values recorded after 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2) were analyzed and compared with those at T0. (3) Results: PI values considerably reduced at moment T1 and T2 for both G1 and G2 (p = 0.0031). PPD was also reduced, but the difference between the groups and the three recording moments was not statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were found when comparing the BOP values between G1 IL and G1 IC for T0/T1 (p = 0.0182) and T1/T2 (p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between G2 and G1 IL or G1 IC. (4) Conclusions: Laser therapy as an adjunct to conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis leads to a statistically significant reduction in bleeding on probing at 3-month and 6-month re-evaluations. Moreover, it leads to an evident reduction in probing depth but with no statistical significance. These results should be interpreted with caution, and more in-depth research should be performed to create a complete laser therapy protocol for peri-implant mucositis.