Ángela Puig Ramos

Dr. Ángela Puig Ramos


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Experimental Gerontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÁRÁngela Puig Ramos
Ángela Puig Ramos
LRLisa Rancan
Lisa Rancan
Sergio D. ParedesSergio D. Paredes
Sergio D. Paredes
ACAdrián Carrasco
Adrián Carrasco
Germaine EscamesGermaine Escames
Germaine Escames
JTJesús A.F. Tresguerres
Jesús A.F. Tresguerres

21 April 2020 in International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLisa Rancan
Lisa Rancan
ÁRÁngela Puig Ramos
Ángela Puig Ramos
JBJosé M Balibrea
José M Balibrea
Sergio D. ParedesSergio D. Paredes
Sergio D. Paredes
CGCruz García
Cruz García
EVElena Vara
Elena Vara
Epidemiological data suggest protective effects of oestrogen and phytoestrogen on lung tissue. This study aimed to elucidate the role of 17-β-oestradiol and phytoestrogen in age-related inhibition of surfactant synthesis and oxidative stress in rat type II pneumocytes. Forty male and 66 female Wistar rats were used. Female rats were randomly kept intact or ovariectomized at age 12 months. At age 22 months, ovariectomized rats received 17-β-oestradiol, soy extract, or no treatment. Oxidative stress markers CO, NO, cGMP and lipid peroxide (LPO), antioxidant enzymes and phosphatidylcholine (PC) were measured in cultured type II pneumocytes isolated at ages 2, 14, 18, 22 and 24 months. Old, male and ovariectomized rats showed significantly higher CO, NO, cGMP and LPO and lower PC content and antioxidant enzymes. 17-β-oestradiol and phytoestrogen significantly reversed these effects. In conclusion, aging and oestrogen deprivation decreased PC synthesis and altered the redox status in type II pneumocytes, which were partially restored by 17-β-oestradiol or soy supplementation.

6 September 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFElena de la Fuente
Elena de la Fuente
FGFrancisco Andres de la Gala Garcia
Francisco Andres de la Gala Garcia
JHJavier Hortal
Javier Hortal
CSCarlos Simon
Carlos Simon
MFMaría Almudena Reyes Fierro
María Almudena Reyes Fierro
IGIgnacio Garutti
Ignacio Garutti
Background/Objectives: Lidocaine has demonstrated immunomodulatory properties and promising antitumor effects in experimental models, but its impact on long-term outcomes following oncologic surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the impact of intraoperative lidocaine versus remifentanil on long-term cancer outcomes after primary lung cancer surgery. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT03905837, EudraCT 2016-004271-52). From 154 patients who underwent elective lung resection via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) between January 2019 and June 2021 and were randomized to receive intraoperative lidocaine (intravenous or paravertebral) or remifentanil, we analyzed data from patients with confirmed primary lung cancer in the surgery specimen. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed through May 2025. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Among the 97 patients with primary lung cancer finally included in the analysis, those in the lidocaine group exhibited improved OS compared with those who received intravenous remifentanil (log-rank p = 0.022). This association remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.13–5.96, p = 0.025). No significant differences were observed in DFS overall (log-rank p = 0.283) or in DFS limited to recurrences of cancers present at the time of surgery, either the resected primary tumor or a prior malignancy (log-rank p = 0.080). Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, lidocaine administration during oncologic lung resection was associated with improved OS in primary lung cancer patients. No differences in DFS were observed between groups; however, a non-significant trend toward improved DFS in lidocaine patients was noted when focusing on recurrences of cancers present at the time of surgery. Further investigation in larger prospective studies is warranted.