Background—The aim of the present study was to define the prevalence of untreated atrial fibrillation (AF) in a systematic screening program using intermittent ECG recordings among 75/76-year-old individuals and to study the feasibility of initiating protective oral anticoagulant treatment (OAC).

Approximately 10% of ischemic strokes are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) first diagnosed at the time of stroke. Detecting asymptomatic AF would provide an opportunity to prevent these strokes by instituting appropriate anticoagulation. The AF-SCREEN international collaboration was formed in September 2015 to promote discussion and research about AF screening as a strategy to reduce stroke and death and to provide advocacy for implementation of country-specific AF screening programs. During 2016, 60 expert members of AF-SCREEN, including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, health economists, and patient advocates, were invited to prepare sections of a draft document. In August 2016, 51 members met in Rome to discuss the draft document and consider the key points arising from it using a Delphi process. These key points emphasize that screen-detected AF found at a single timepoint or by intermittent ECG recordings over 2 weeks is not a benign condition and, with additional stroke factors, carries sufficient risk of stroke to justify consideration of anticoagulation. With regard to the methods of mass screening, handheld ECG devices have the advantage of providing a verifiable ECG trace that guidelines require for AF diagnosis and would therefore be preferred as screening tools. Certain patient groups, such as those with recent embolic stroke of uncertain source (ESUS), require more intensive monitoring for AF. Settings for screening include various venues in both the community and the clinic, but they must be linked to a pathway for appropriate diagnosis and management for screening to be effective. It is recognized that health resources vary widely between countries and health systems, so the setting for AF screening should be both country- and health system-specific. Based on current knowledge, this white paper provides a strong case for AF screening now while recognizing that large randomized outcomes studies would be helpful to strengthen the evidence base.

Background—: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent source of cardiac emboli in patients with ischemic stroke. AF may be asymptomatic and therefore undiagnosed. Screening for silent AF seems suitable in risk populations, however little is known on the yield and cost-effectiveness of such screening. Methods and Results—: All inhabitants in the municipality of Halmstad, Sweden aged 75 to 76 years were invited to a stepwise screening program for AF. As a first step, participants recorded a 12-lead ECG and reported their relevant medical history. Those with sinus rhythm on 12-lead ECG, no history of AF, and ≥2 risk factors according to CHADS ₂ were invited to a 2-week recording period using a hand-held ECG and asked to record 20 or 30 seconds twice daily and if palpitations occurred. One thousand, three hundred thirty inhabitants were invited, of whom 848 (64%) participated. Previously undiagnosed silent AF was found in 10 (1%) among 848 individuals who recorded 12-lead ECG. Among 81 patients with known AF, 35 (43%) were not on oral anticoagulation treatment. Among 403 persons with ≥2 risk factors for stroke, who completed the hand-held ECG event recording, 30 (7.4%) were diagnosed with paroxysmal AF. Thus 75/848 (9%) of the screened population were candidates for new oral anticoagulation treatment, of those 57 actually started oral anticoagulation treatment. Conclusions—: Stepwise risk factor–stratified AF screening in a 75-year-old population yields a large share of candidates for oral anticoagulation treatment on AF indication.