Roderich Tumulka

Prof. Roderich Tumulka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 February 2006 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSheldon Goldstein
Sheldon Goldstein
JLJoel L. Lebowitz
Joel L. Lebowitz
RTRoderich Tumulka
Roderich Tumulka
NZNino Zanghì
Nino Zanghì
It is well known that a system S weakly coupled to a heat bath B is described by the canonical ensemble when the composite S+B is described by the microcanonical ensemble corresponding to a suitable energy shell. This is true for both classical distributions on the phase space and quantum density matrices. Here we show that a much stronger statement holds for quantum systems. Even if the state of the composite corresponds to a single wave function rather than a mixture, the reduced density matrix of the system is canonical, for the overwhelming majority of wave functions in the subspace corresponding to the energy interval encompassed by the microcanonical ensemble. This clarifies, expands, and justifies remarks made by Schrödinger in 1952.

2 December 2006 in Journal of Statistical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRoderich Tumulka
Roderich Tumulka

7 September 2010 in The European Physical Journal H
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSheldon Goldstein
Sheldon Goldstein
JLJ. L. Lebowitz
J. L. Lebowitz
RTRoderich Tumulka
Roderich Tumulka
NZN. Zanghì
N. Zanghì

23 August 2004 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DDDetlef Dürr
Detlef Dürr
SGSheldon Goldstein
Sheldon Goldstein
RTRoderich Tumulka
Roderich Tumulka
NZNino Zanghì
Nino Zanghì
We discuss a recently proposed extension of Bohmian mechanics to quantum field theory. For more or less any regularized quantum field theory there is a corresponding theory of particle motion, which, in particular, ascribes trajectories to the electrons or whatever sort of particles the quantum field theory is about. Corresponding to the nonconservation of the particle number operator in the quantum field theory, the theory describes explicit creation and annihilation events: the world lines for the particles can begin and end.

1 September 2008 in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VAValia Allori
Valia Allori
SGSheldon Goldstein
Sheldon Goldstein
RTRoderich Tumulka
Roderich Tumulka
NZNino Zanghì
Nino Zanghì
Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory provide opposite resolutions of the quantum measurement problem: the former postulates additional variables (the particle positions) besides the wave function, whereas the latter implements spontaneous collapses of the wave function by a nonlinear and stochastic modification of Schrödinger's equation. Still, both theories, when understood appropriately, share the following structure: They are ultimately not about wave functions but about ‘matter’ moving in space, represented by either particle trajectories, fields on space-time, or a discrete set of space-time points. The role of the wave function then is to govern the motion of the matter.

20 May 2010 in Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSheldon Goldstein
Sheldon Goldstein
JLJoel L. Lebowitz
Joel L. Lebowitz
CMChristian Mastrodonato
Christian Mastrodonato
RTRoderich Tumulka
Roderich Tumulka
NZNino Zanghì
Nino Zanghì
We discuss the content and significance of John von Neumann’s quantum ergodic theorem (QET) of 1929, a strong result arising from the mere mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. The QET is a precise formulation of what we call normal typicality, i.e. the statement that, for typical large systems, every initial wave function ψ 0 from an energy shell is ‘normal’: it evolves in such a way that | ψ t 〉〈 ψ t | is, for most t , macroscopically equivalent to the micro-canonical density matrix. The QET has been mostly forgotten after it was criticized as a dynamically vacuous statement in several papers in the 1950s. However, we point out that this criticism does not apply to the actual QET, a correct statement of which does not appear in these papers, but to a different (indeed weaker) statement. Furthermore, we formulate a stronger statement of normal typicality, based on the observation that the bound on the deviations from the average specified by von Neumann is unnecessarily coarse and a much tighter (and more relevant) bound actually follows from his proof.