Background: New multiple myeloma (MM) medications have revolutionized the treatment landscape, but they are also associated with a range of adverse events (AEs). This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of AEs reported for four new MM medications: daratumumab, ixazomib, elotuzumab, and panobinostat. Methods: This study uses a descriptive retrospective approach to analyze the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2015 to 2022. It includes variables like medication names, report details, patient demographics, adverse events, and reporter types. The initial dataset consists of over 3700 adverse events, which are categorized into 21 groups for clarity and comparison. Results: The FAERS database revealed 367,756 adverse events (AEs) associated with novel multiple myeloma drugs from 2015–2022. Ixazomib had the highest number of reported AEs with 206,243 reports, followed by daratumumab with 98,872 reports, then elotuzumab with 26,193 AEs. Ixazomib’s AE reports increased dramatically over the study period, rising approximately 51-fold from 1183 in 2015 to 60,835 in 2022. Of the medications studied, ixazomib also recorded the highest number of deaths (24,206), followed by daratumumab (11,624), panobinostat (7227), and elotuzumab (3349). The majority of AEs occurred in patients aged 55–64 and 65–74 years. Conclusions: Ixazomib, a new MM medication, had the highest number of AEs reported. Also, it has the highest rate of reported deaths compared to other new MM medications. Clinicians should be aware of the potential AEs associated with this medication and further research is needed to understand the reasons for the high number of AEs and to develop mitigation strategies. More attention should also be paid to the safety of new multiple myeloma medications in younger patients.

Background: Fungal infections, particularly among immunocompromised individuals, present significant challenges due to rising incidence rates, treatment costs, and increasing resistance to antifungal agents. This study evaluates trends in antifungal use among Medicaid beneficiaries, focusing on prescribing patterns, costs, and pricing to optimize therapy. Methods: Using the national Medicaid outpatient pharmacy claims data collected by the US Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services, a retrospective drug utilization analysis was conducted for antifungal medications from 2009 to 2023. Antifungal medications were categorized based on therapeutic use. The study examined annual utilization, reimbursement, and pricing trends, along with the market share. Results: Overall Medicaid utilization of superficial fungal infections’ (SFIs’) medications increased from 3.95 million prescriptions in 2009 to 6.16 million in 2023. Nystatin was the most frequently utilized SFI agent, while fluconazole emerged as the most commonly prescribed agent for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). In 2022, a notable spike occurred in the number of prescriptions for both SFIs and IFIs. Medicaid’s total expenditure on SFI medications rose from USD 121.9 million in 2009 to USD 155 million in 2023, while spending on IFI medications fluctuated substantially, peaking at USD 156.8 million in 2022 before declining to USD 80.7 million in 2023. After being introduced to the market, efinaconazole became the most expensive SFI agent over the years. Isavuconazole, the latest approved IFI medication, demonstrated sustained utilization, reimbursement, and price increases. Conclusions: The substantial rise in antifungal utilization and spending underscores the growing financial burden on Medicaid, emphasizing the need for policy interventions to manage costs and generic drug substitution while ensuring equitable access to these essential treatments. However, this study is limited by the lack of clinical outcome data and information on off-label use. Additionally, reimbursement data may not accurately reflect actual drug prices.

Vitiligo, an autoimmune disorder causing depigmented skin patches, includes two types, segmental (SV) and non-segmental (NSV). Previously, NSV was off-label treated using Calcineurine inhibitors (Tacrolimus and Pimecrolimus). In 2022, the FDA approved Ruxolitinib cream, targeting the JAK/STAT pathway for NSV treatment based on promising results. This research conducts a retrospective descriptive safety assessment of Tacrolimus, Pimecrolimus, and Ruxolitinib safety in vitiligo treatment, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database spanning the period from 2013 to 2023 and including patients aged 2 years and above, encompassing both brand and generic names. A total of 844 adverse event reports involving 388 patients were extracted and categorized into dermatological and systemic groups for analysis. Tacrolimus resulted in 12 hospitalizations, two life-threatening events, and four disabilities. Pimecrolimus exhibited urticaria and pigmentation disorders, with tooth fracture as the primary systemic event. Pericarditis was the predominant systemic side effect of Ruxolitinib, followed by anemia, headache, and urosepsis. Local dermatological side effects reported were generally mild, not warranting treatment cessation. In conclusion, vitiligo significantly impacts patients’ psychological well-being, necessitating continuous post-marketing safety monitoring for topical medications.

Aims: To describe and analyze trends in the utilization, spending, and average per prescription price of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the US Medicaid population. Methods: Using the publicly available national outpatient Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data, a retrospective, descriptive trend analysis was conducted on DMARDs from 1991 to 2022. Annual prescription counts and reimbursement amounts were calculated for nonbiologic and biologic DMARDs. Average per prescription price and Market share competition were calculated and analyzed for DMARDs. Results: Medicaid utilization of nonbiologic peaked in 2021 with 884,000 while biologic DMARDs with 688,000 prescriptions. In 2022, biologic utilization took the lead and exceed nonbiologic with 1.5 million prescriptions. Over the last 32 years, biologics captured 94% of Medicaid expenditures toward DMARDs, of which, 56% was toward adalimumab alone. On the other hand, spending on conventional DMARDs accounted for 33% while 67% accounted toward Janus Kinase Inhibitors. Biologic DMARDs average prices increased from around $800 to around $6000. However, the average adalimumab price increased 12-fold from around $1200 in 2003 to over $15,000 in 2021. Medicaid spending toward adalimumab increased by 179%. Conclusions: The substantial increase of DMARDs utilization and expenditure contributed significant burden to Medicaid budget. Introducing biosimilars into the market in the past few years is eroding the market share for several established biologics. Further cost-containment policies may be necessary for costly DMARD pharmacotherapy.