Jue Zhang

Dr. Jue Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2025 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHua Meng
Hua Meng
LZLina Zhang
Lina Zhang
FYFan Yang
Fan Yang
LHLan Hai
Lan Hai
YWYuxing Wei
Yuxing Wei
JZJue Zhang
Jue Zhang
In the domain of animal management, the technology for individual livestock identification is in a state of continuous evolution, encompassing objectives such as precise tracking of animal activities, optimization of vaccination procedures, effective disease control, accurate recording of individual growth, and prevention of theft and fraud. These advancements are pivotal to the efficient and sustainable development of the livestock industry. Recently, visual livestock biometrics have emerged as a highly promising research focus due to their non-invasive nature. This paper aims to comprehensively survey the techniques for individual livestock identification based on computer vision methods. It begins by elucidating the uniqueness of the primary biometric features of livestock, such as facial features, and their critical role in the recognition process. This review systematically overviews the data collection environments and devices used in related research, providing an analysis of the impact of different scenarios on recognition accuracy. Then, the review delves into the analysis and explication of livestock identification methods, based on extant research outcomes, with a focus on the application and trends of advanced technologies such as deep learning. We also highlight the challenges faced in this field, such as data quality and algorithmic efficiency, and introduce the baseline models and innovative solutions developed to address these issues. Finally, potential future research directions are explored, including the investigation of multimodal data fusion techniques, the construction and evaluation of large-scale benchmark datasets, and the application of multi-target tracking and identification technologies in livestock scenarios.

2 June 2024 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYang Yu
Yang Yu
HTHaiqing Tian
Haiqing Tian
KZKai Zhao
Kai Zhao
LGLina Guo
Lina Guo
JZJue Zhang
Jue Zhang
JTJinxian Tao
Jinxian Tao
As pH is a key factor affecting the quality of maize silage, its accurate detection is essential to ensuring product quality. Although traditional methods for testing the pH of maize silage feed are widely used, the procedures are often complex and time-consuming and may damage the sample. This study presents a non-destructive hyperspectral imaging (HSI) technology that provides a more efficient and cost-effective method of monitoring pH by capturing the spectral information of samples and analyzing their chemical and physical properties rapidly and without contact. We applied four spectral preprocessing methods, among which the multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) preprocessing method yielded the best results. To minimize model redundancy and enhance predictive performance, we utilized six feature extraction methods for characteristic wavelength extraction, integrating these with partial least squares (PLS), non-linear support vector machine regression (SVR), and extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithms to construct a quantitative pH value prediction model. The results showed that the model based on the bootstrapping soft shrinkage (BOSS) feature wavelength extraction method outperformed the other feature extraction methods, selecting 20 pH value-related feature wavelengths from 256 bands and building a stable BOSS–ELM model with prediction set determination coefficient (RP2), root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP), and relative percentage deviation (RPD) values of 0.9241, 0.4372, and 3.6565, respectively. To further optimize the model for precisely predicting pH at each pixel in hyperspectral images, we employed three algorithms: the genetic algorithm (GA), whale optimization algorithm (WOA), and bald eagle search (BES). These algorithms optimized and compared the BOSS–ELM model to obtain the best model for predicting maize silage pH: the BOSS–BES–ELM model. This model achieved a determination coefficient (RP2) of 0.9598, an RMSEP of 0.3216, and an RPD of 5.1448. We generated a visualized distribution map of pH value variation in maize silage using the BOSS–BES–ELM model. This study provides strong technical support and a reference for the rapid, non-destructive detection of maize silage pH from an image, an advancement of great significance to ensuring the quality of maize silage.

14 January 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KZKai Zhao
Kai Zhao
HTHaiqing Tian
Haiqing Tian
JZJue Zhang
Jue Zhang
YYYang Yu
Yang Yu
LGLina Guo
Lina Guo
海李海军 李
海军 李
Non-destructive detection of maize silage quality is essential. The aim is to propose a fast and non-destructive silage pH detection method based on a colorimetric sensor array (CSA). Extended color components, a novel sensitive dye screening method, and a feature screening method were integrated and applied to enhance pH detection. Fifty color components were constructed from five color spaces and used to extract information about the response of CSA to silage. Forward and backward stepwise selection and support vector regression (SVR) were combined to create a sensitive dye screening method, which was used to determine the optimal sensitive dye. The variable combination population analysis–iteratively retains informative variables algorithm was iterated to optimize effective features. Consequently, six hundred variables were extracted from the twelve dyes, which were able to comprehensively and finely characterize the CSA response. Four sensitive dyes were screened out from the twelve dyes, which were sensitive to silage volatile compounds and accurately reflected the odor changes. Twenty-eight effective features were preferred, based on which the SVR model had Rp2, RMSEP and RPD scores of 0.9533, 0.4186, and 4.4186, respectively; the pH prediction performance was substantially improved. This study provides technical support for the scientific evaluation of silage quality.