Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmic event in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The aim of this study was to identify the clinical impact and prognostic significance of AF on a large cohort of patients with HCM. Echocardiographic and clinical correlates, risk factors for AF and thromboembolic stroke and the prognostic significance of AF were evaluated in 509 patients with an established diagnosis of HCM. A total of 119 patients (23.4%) were diagnosed with AF during the index evaluation visit. AF patients had a higher prevalence of stroke and presented with worse functional impairment. Left atrial diameter (LA size) was a common independent predictor of the arrhythmia (OR: 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.3) and thromboembolic stroke (OR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.01-2.40). AF was an important risk factor for overall mortality (HR=3.4, 95% CI: 1.7-6.5), HCM-related mortality (HR=3.9, 95% CI: 1.8-8.2) and heart failure-related mortality (HR=6.0, 95% CI: 2.0-17.9), even after adjusting for statistically significant clinical and demographic risk factors. However, AF did not affect the risk for sudden death. LA size is an independent predictor of both AF and thromboembolic stroke. Moreover, patients with AF, regardless of type, have significantly higher mortality rates than patients without AF.

The aim of our study was to assess the performance of the new American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines, with respect to sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention, in comparison with the established risk score of the European Society of Cardiology (HCM Risk-SCD), in a large Mediterranean cohort of HCM patients. The clinical and imaging characteristics of 784 HCM patients (mean age at first evaluation 52±16 years, 67.2% males) were analyzed retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for SCD events of the presence of ≥1 risk factor for SCD according to the ACC/AHA Guidelines 2020 and of the HCM Risk-SCD≥6% and HCM Risk-SCD≥4% were estimated during follow-up. During follow-up, 47 (6%) patients suffered a SCD event. The presence of ≥1 major risk factor for SCD according to the new ACC/AHA Guidelines had sensitivity 96% (95% CI 85.5-99.5%) with modest specificity 59% (95% CI 55-62.2%) and negative predictive value 99.5% (95% CI 98.2-99.9%). On the contrary, HCM- Risk-SCD≥6% had a relatively low sensitivity (32%, 95% CI 19.1-47.1%) and high specificity 95% (95% CI 93.1-96.4%), whereas, HCM-Risk-SCD≥4% had sensitivity 60% (95% CI 44-74%) and specificity 83.9% (95% CI 80-85.6%). Both the HCM Risk-SCD cut-off values demonstrated lower negative predictive value but higher accuracy than the ACC/AHA algorithm for SCD prediction. The novel ACC/AHA proposed algorithm identifies most of the patients with an SCD event with the cost of numerous defibrillator implantations. HCM-Risk-SCD demonstrated higher specificity, whereas, its sensitivity and negative predictive value is modest.

Background/Objectives: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most common complication of transradial coronary catheterization. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of RAO and identify the risk factors that predispose patients to it. Methods: We conducted an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, open-label study involving 1357 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization via the transradial route for angiography and/or a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of RAO occurrence. Additionally, a subgroup analysis only for patients undergoing PCIs was performed. Results: The incidence of RAO was 9.5% overall, 10.6% in the angiography-only group and 6.2% in the PCI group. Independent predictors of RAO were as follows: (i) the female gender (aOR = 1.72 (1.05–2.83)), (ii) access site cross-over (aOR = 4.33 (1.02–18.39)), (iii) increased total time of the sheath in the artery (aOR = 1.01 (1.00–1.02)), (iv) radial artery spasms (aOR = 2.47 (1.40–4.36)), (v) the presence of a hematoma (aOR = 2.28 (1.28–4.06)), (vi) post-catheterization dabigatran use (aOR = 5.15 (1.29–20.55)), (vii) manual hemostasis (aOR = 1.94 (1.01–3.72)) and (viii) numbness at radial artery ultrasound (aOR = 8.25 (1.70–40)). Contrariwise, two variables were independently associated with increased odds for radial artery patency (RAP): (i) PCI performance (aOR = 0.19 (0.06–0.63)), and (ii) a higher dosage of intravenous heparin per patient weight (aOR = 0.98 (0.96–0.99)), particularly, a dosage of >50 IU/kg (aOR = 0.56 (0.31–1.00)). In the PCI subgroup, independent predictors of RAO were as follows: (i) radial artery spasms (aOR = 4.48 (1.42–14.16)), (ii) the use of intra-arterial nitroglycerin as a vasodilator (aOR = 7.40 (1.67–32.79)) and (iii) the presence of symptoms at echo (aOR = 3.80 (1.46–9.87)), either pain (aOR = 2.93 (1.05–8.15)) or numbness (aOR = 4.66 (1.17–18.57)). On the other hand, the use of intra-arterial verapamil as a vasodilator (aOR = 0.17 (0.04–0.76)) was independently associated with a greater frequency of RAP. Conclusions: The incidence of RAO in an unselected, all-comers European population after transradial coronary catheterization for angiography and/or PCIs is similar to that reported in the international literature. Several RAO prognostic factors have been confirmed, and new ones are described. The female gender, radial artery trauma and manual hemostasis are the strongest predictors of RAO. Our results could help in the future identification of patients at higher risk of RAO, for whom less invasive diagnostic procedures maybe preferred, if possible.

The GRACE score constitutes a useful tool for risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), while the SYNTAX score determines the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study sought to correlate these scores and assess the accuracy of the GRACE score in predicting the extent of CAD. A total of 539 patients with ACS undergoing coronary angiography were included in this analysis. The patients were classified into those with a SYNTAX score < 33 and a SYNTAX score ≥ 33. Spearman’s correlation and receiver operator characteristic analysis were conducted to investigate the role of the GRACE score as a predictor of the SYNTAX score. There was a significantly positive correlation between the SYNTAX and the GRACE scores (r = 0.32, p < 0.001). The GRACE score predicted severe CAD (SYNTAX ≥ 33) moderately well (the area under the curve was 0.595 (0.522–0.667)). A GRACE score of 126 was documented as the optimal cut-off for the prediction of a SYNTAX score ≥ 33 (sensitivity = 53.5% and specificity = 66%). Therefore, our study reports a significantly positive correlation between the GRACE and the SYNTAX score in patients with ACS. Notably, NSTEMI patients with a high-risk coronary anatomy have higher calculated GRACE scores. A multidisciplinary approach by a heart team could possibly alter the therapeutic approach and management in patients presenting with ACS and a high calculated GRACE score.