Caroline Delaire

Caroline Delaire


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 May 2017 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CDCaroline Delaire
Caroline Delaire
RPRachel Peletz
Rachel Peletz
EKEmily Kumpel
Emily Kumpel
JKJoyce Kisiangani
Joyce Kisiangani
RBRobert Bain
Robert Bain
RKRanjiv Khush
Ranjiv Khush
Microbial water quality monitoring is crucial for managing water resources and protecting public health. However, institutional testing activities in sub-Saharan Africa are currently limited. Because the economics of water quality testing are poorly understood, the extent to which cost may be a barrier to monitoring in different settings is unclear. This study used cost data from 18 African monitoring institutions (piped water suppliers and health surveillance agencies in six countries) and estimates of water supply type coverage from 15 countries to assess the annual financial requirements for microbial water testing at both national and regional levels, using World Health Organization recommendations for sampling frequency. We found that a microbial water quality test costs 21.0 ± 11.3 USD, on average, including consumables, equipment, labor, and logistics, which is higher than previously calculated. Our annual cost estimates for microbial monitoring of piped supplies and improved point sources ranged between 8 000 USD for Equatorial Guinea and 1.9 million USD for Ethiopia, depending primarily on the population served but also on the distribution of piped water system sizes. A comparison with current national water and sanitation budgets showed that the cost of implementing prescribed testing levels represents a relatively modest proportion of existing budgets (<2%). At the regional level, we estimated that monitoring the microbial quality of all improved water sources in sub-Saharan Africa would cost 16.0 million USD per year, which is minimal in comparison to the projected annual capital costs of achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6.1 of safe water for all (14.8 billion USD).

23 December 2020 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CDCaroline Delaire
Caroline Delaire
RPRachel Peletz
Rachel Peletz
SHSalim Haji
Salim Haji
JKJoan Kones
Joan Kones
ESEdinah Samuel
Edinah Samuel
RKRanjiv Khush
Ranjiv Khush

EKEmily Kumpel
Emily Kumpel
CDCaroline Delaire
Caroline Delaire
RPRachel Peletz
Rachel Peletz
JKJoyce Kisiangani
Joyce Kisiangani
ARAngella Rinehold
Angella Rinehold
RKRanjiv Khush
Ranjiv Khush
This study investigated the effectiveness of Water Safety Plans (WSP) implemented in 99 water supply systems across 12 countries in the Asia-Pacific region. An impact assessment methodology including 36 indicators was developed based on a conceptual framework proposed by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and before/after data were collected between November 2014 and June 2016. WSPs were associated with infrastructure improvements at the vast majority (82) of participating sites and to increased financial support at 37 sites. In addition, significant changes were observed in operations and management practices, number of water safety-related meetings, unaccounted-for water, water quality testing activities, and monitoring of consumer satisfaction. However, the study also revealed challenges in the implementation of WSPs, including financial constraints and insufficient capacity. Finally, this study provided an opportunity to test the impact assessment methodology itself, and a series of recommendations are made to improve the approach (indicators, study design, data collection methods) for evaluating WSPs.

13 May 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JTJessica Tribbe
Jessica Tribbe
VZValentina Zuin
Valentina Zuin
CDCaroline Delaire
Caroline Delaire
RKRanjiv Khush
Ranjiv Khush
RPRachel Peletz
Rachel Peletz
Community-led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is a popular intervention for eliminating open defecation in rural communities. Previous research has explored the contextual and programmatic factors that influence CLTS performance. Less is known about the community-level conditions that sustain latrine coverage and use. We hypothesized three categories of community conditions underlying CLTS sustainability: (i) engagement of community leaders, (ii) follow-up intensity, and (iii) support to poor households. We evaluated these among communities in Cambodia and Ghana, and applied fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to identify combinations of conditions that influenced current latrine coverage and consistent latrine use. In Cambodia, latrine coverage was highest in communities with active commune-level leaders rather than traditional leaders, and with leaders who used casual approaches for promoting latrine construction. Latrine use in Cambodia was less consistent among communities with intense commune engagement, higher pressure from traditional leaders, high follow-up and high financial support. In Ghana, by contrast, active leaders, high follow-up, high pro-poor support, and continued activities post-implementation promoted latrine coverage and consistent use. The different responses to CLTS programming emphasize that rural communities do not have homogenous reactions to CLTS. Accounting for community perceptions and context when designing community-led interventions can foster long-term sustainability beyond short-term achievement.

7 January 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDCaroline Delaire
Caroline Delaire
JKJoyce Kisiangani
Joyce Kisiangani
KSKara Stuart
Kara Stuart
PAPrince Antwi-Agyei
Prince Antwi-Agyei
RKRanjiv Khush
Ranjiv Khush
RPRachel Peletz
Rachel Peletz
Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a widely used approach to reduce open defecation in rural areas of low-income countries. Following CLTS programs, communities are designated as open defecation free (ODF) when household-level toilet coverage reaches the threshold specified by national guidelines (e.g., 80% in Ghana). However, because sanitation conditions are rarely monitored after communities are declared ODF, the ability of CLTS to generate lasting reductions in open defecation is poorly understood. In this study, we examined the extent to which levels of toilet ownership and use were sustained in 109 communities in rural Northern Ghana up to two and a half years after they had obtained ODF status. We found that the majority of communities (75%) did not meet Ghana’s ODF requirements. Over a third of households had either never owned (16%) or no longer owned (24%) a functional toilet, and 25% reported practicing open defecation regularly. Toilet pit and superstructure collapse were the primary causes of reversion to open defecation. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that communities had higher toilet coverage when they were located further from major roads, were not located on rocky soil, reported having a system of fines to punish open defecation, and when less time had elapsed since ODF status achievement. Households were more likely to own a functional toilet if they were larger, wealthier, had a male household head who had not completed primary education, had no children under the age of five, and benefitted from the national Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) program. Wealthier households were also more likely to use a toilet for defecation and to rebuild their toilet when it collapsed. Our findings suggest that interventions that address toilet collapse and the difficulty of rebuilding, particularly among the poorest and most vulnerable households, will improve the longevity of CLTS-driven sanitation improvements in rural Ghana.

1 June 2022 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJohn Trimmer
John Trimmer
JKJoyce Kisiangani
Joyce Kisiangani
RPRachel Peletz
Rachel Peletz
KSKara Stuart
Kara Stuart
PAPrince Antwi-Agyei
Prince Antwi-Agyei
CDCaroline Delaire
Caroline Delaire