Asthma may be defined as eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic based on the presence of eosinophils in sputum. Recently a further classification into four inflammatory subtypes has been suggested. The aim of the present study was to describe the association between these inflammatory subtypes and markers of airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. In 62 adult non-smoking asthmatics, (18–65 yr) not taking inhaled steroids, sputum induction, bronchial challenge with mannitol and measurement of exhaled NO (eNO) were performed. Based on the eosinophil and neutrophil proportions in sputum, subjects were categorised into four inflammatory subtypes: Eosinophilic asthma: i.e., sputum eosinophils > 1.0%. Neutrophilic asthma: i.e., sputum neutrophils > 61%. Mixed granulocytic asthma: both increased eosinophils and neutrophils. Paucigranulocytic asthma: i.e., normal levels of both eosinophils and neutrophils. Among subjects with non-eosinophilic asthma, neutrophilic asthma was associated with low levels of eNO (Median (IQR): 12 ppb (8–27 ppb), whereas subjects with non-eosinophilic asthma of the paucigranulocytic subtype had levels of eNO (48 ppb (29–65 ppb)) that were comparable to subjects with eosinophilic asthma of the mixed granulocytic type (47 ppb (33–112 ppb). Purely eosinophilic asthma was associated with higher levels of eNO (77 ppb (37–122 ppb)). Furthermore, a low degree of airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol was observed in neutrophilic asthma (PD₁₅: (Median (IQR) 512 mg (291–610 mg))), whereas it was moderate in paucigranulocytic asthma (238 mg (77–467 mg)) and comparable to eosinophilic asthma of the mixed granulocytic subtype (186 mg (35–355 mg)). The highest degree of AHR to mannitol was observed in purely eosinophilic asthma (107 mg (68–245 mg)). In conclusion, further subclassification of eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma showed significant differences in airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and exhaled NO levels among the four inflammatory subtypes.

Background: There are limited data on outcomes of moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone in a real-world setting. We sought to compare the effectiveness of standard of care (SOC) alone versus SOC plus remdesivir and dexamethasone. Methods: Two population-based nationwide cohorts of individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 during February through December 2020 were studied. Death within 30 days and need of mechanical ventilation (MV) were compared by inverse probability of treatment weighted (ITPW) logistic regression analysis and shown as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The 30-days mortality rate of 1694 individuals treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone in addition to SOC was 12.6% compared to 19.7% for 1053 individuals receiving SOC alone. This corresponded to a weighted OR of 30-day mortality of 0.47 (95% CI: .38–.57) for patients treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone compared to patients receiving SOC alone. Similarly, progression to MV was reduced (OR 0.36; 95% CI: .29–.46). Conclusions: Treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 during June through December that included remdesivir and dexamethasone was associated with reduced 30-day mortality and need of MV compared to treatment in February through May.

Background: There are emerging data of long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) comprising a diversity of symptoms. The aim of this study was to systematically describe and measure pulmonary and extra-pulmonary post-COVID-19 complications in relation to acute COVID-19 severity.Methods: Patients attending a standard of care 3 months post-hospitalisation follow-up visit and those referred by their general practitioner because of persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms were included. Patients underwent symptomatic, quality of life, pulmonary (lung function and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)), cardiac (high-resolution ECG), physical (1-min sit and stand test (1-MSTST), handgrip strength, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)) and cognitive evaluations.Results: All 34 hospitalised and 22 out of 23 non-hospitalised patients had ≥1 complaint or abnormal finding at follow-up. Overall, 67% of patients were symptomatic (Medical Research Council (MRC) ≥2 or COPD assessment test (CAT) ≥10), with no difference between hospitalisedversusnon-hospitalised patients. Pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D_LCO)) <80% of predicted) was impaired in 68% of patients.D_LCOwas significantly lower in those hospitalised compared to non-hospitalised (70.1±18.0versus80.2±11.2% predicted, p=0.02). Overall, 53% had an abnormal HRCT (predominantly ground-glass opacities) with higher composite computed tomography (CT) scores in hospitalisedversusnon-hospitalised patients (2.3 (0.1–4.8) and 0.0 (0.0–0.3), p<0.001). 1-MSTST was below the 25th percentile in almost half of patients, but no signs of cardiac dysfunction were found. Cognitive impairments were present in 59–66% of hospitalised and 31–44% of non-hospitalised patients (p=0.08).Conclusion: Three months after COVID-19 infection, patients were still symptomatic and demonstrated objective respiratory, functional, radiological and cognitive abnormalities, which were more prominent in hospitalised patients. Our study underlines the importance of multidimensional management strategies in these patients.

Background: Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) is a common cause of exertional breathlessness and wheeze yet is frequently misdiagnosed as asthma. Insight regarding the demographic characteristics, laryngeal abnormalities and impact of EILO is currently limited, with data only available from individual centre reports. The aim of this work was to provide a broader perspective from a collaboration between multiple international expert centres.Methods: Five geographically distinct clinical paediatric and adult centres (3 Denmark, 1 UK, 1 USA) with an expertise in assessing unexplained exertional breathlessness completed database entry of key characteristic features for all cases referred with suspected EILO over a 5-year period. All included cases completed clinical asthma workup and continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE) testing for EILO.Results: Data were available for 1007 individuals (n=713 female (71%)) with a median (range) age of 24 (8–76) years, and of these 586 (58%) were diagnosed with EILO. In all centres, EILO was frequently misdiagnosed as asthma; on average there was a 2-year delay to diagnosis of EILO, and current asthma medication was discontinued in 20%. Collapse at the supraglottic level was seen in 60%, whereas vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) was only detected/visualised in 18%. Nearly half (45%) of individuals with EILO were active participants in recreational-level sports, suggesting that EILO is not simply confined to competitive/elite athletes.Conclusion: Our findings indicate that key clinical characteristics and the impact of EILO/VCD are similar in globally distinct regions, facilitating improved awareness of this condition to enhance recognition and avoid erroneous asthma treatment.