Brian Blasiole

Dr. Brian Blasiole


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2025 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BBBrian Blasiole
Brian Blasiole
DLDanielle Rose Lavage
Danielle Rose Lavage
HLHsing-Hua Sylvia Lin
Hsing-Hua Sylvia Lin
SLScott Licata
Scott Licata
SSSahana Sivam
Sahana Sivam
SSSenthilkumar Sadhasivam
Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
Introduction: Methadone is an opioid-sparing opioid and it is increasingly used in children undergoing surgery due to its beneficial effects on postoperative pain scores, decreased opioid requirements, and fewer adverse effects compared to other opioids. Intraoperative methadone is not well studied in pediatric cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that intraoperative methadone-based analgesia would provide comparable effectiveness in pain management to non-methadone-based analgesia, including caudal morphine, following pediatric cardiac surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 287 children undergoing cardiac surgery using single institutional electronic health records with Society of Thoracic Surgeons database outcomes. Patients were administered intravenous opioids plus caudal morphine (≤6 years) or intravenous opioids in the non-methadone group versus intravenous methadone (two 0.1 mg/kg doses given intraoperatively) with or without additional intraoperative opioids. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg. Results: This study included 287 pediatric cardiac surgical patients with a mean age of 3.8 years, 59% male, and 72% White. Among 287 patients, 67 (23%) received intraoperative methadone. Unadjusted analysis showed the methadone group had lower postoperative opioid use on the day of surgery (median = 0.3 vs. 0.5 MME/kg, p = 0.005). Adjusted analyses showed there were no significant differences in postoperative opioid use, average pain, maximum pain, antiemetic use, reintubation, and use of naloxone between methadone and non-methadone groups. Hospital length of stay was 2.62 times longer (95% CI: [1.55, 4.41] p < 0.001) in the methadone group vs non-methadone group, but this was only shown in the younger children (≤6 years), who also had higher max pain scores in the methadone group. All outcomes were similar between analgesia groups in older children (>6 years). Conclusions: Intraoperative methadone-based analgesia had comparable effectiveness in postoperative opioid use, pain, and antiemetic use compared to non-methadone-based intraoperative pain management for pediatric cardiac surgery. Large prospective studies of perioperative methadone are needed to examine methadone’s analgesic benefits in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

20 March 2019 in Pediatric Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RERotem Elitsur
Rotem Elitsur
AHApril Hollenbeck
April Hollenbeck
LTLaura Tasan
Laura Tasan
KTKathryn Seraphin Torok
Kathryn Seraphin Torok
ECElaine Cassidy
Elaine Cassidy
IAIsabela-Cajiao Angelelli
Isabela-Cajiao Angelelli
Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are frequently used in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. There is a paucity of evidence-based research describing methods of pain and anxiety control for this procedure. IACI were mostly performed under general anesthesia for children younger than 13 years old in our institution as of 2014. We started to integrate sedation services more commonly in our institution with the minimal sedation/anxiolysis (MSA) protocol outlined as an alternative to general anesthesia for IACI in 2015. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost savings of a minimal sedation protocol for intra-articular corticosteroid injections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients after instituting this protocol at our institution. The MSA protocol included nitrous oxide, intranasal fentanyl, a topical numbing agent, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ondansetron and child life intervention. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on a total of 80 consecutive patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who underwent joint injections using the protocol. The procedure was successfully completed in greater than 95% of the patients. The median pain score (measured on a verbal numeric scale of 0–10) reported by the patient was 1 (IQR 0–2.5), by the parent 1 (IQR 0–2), by the rheumatologist 1 (IQR 0–1), and by the sedationist 1 (IQR 0–1). Degree of motion during the procedure was reported by the rheumatologist and the sedationist as none in 68% of the patients, mild in 36% and moderate in 6%. Patient, parent, rheumatologist and sedationist rated satisfaction as very high in the vast majority (94%). Emesis was reported in only 2 (2.5%) patients, no significant adverse events were reported, and no patients progressed to a deeper level of sedation than intended. Financial analysis revealed a 33% cost reduction compared with the use of general anesthesia in the operating room. A minimal sedation/anxiolysis protocol (including nitrous oxide, intranasal fentanyl, a topical numbing agent, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ondansetron and child life intervention), provides safe and effective analgesia for intra-articular corticosteroid injection in a subset of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and offers a lower cost alternative to general anesthesia.

27 August 2026 in Pediatric Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAditi Gupta
Aditi Gupta
WLWilliam Long
William Long
SYSara Young
Sara Young
BBBrian Blasiole
Brian Blasiole
NMNicholas Mouzakis
Nicholas Mouzakis
LOLaura Olivieri
Laura Olivieri

1 January 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
BBBrian Blasiole
Brian Blasiole
SBShawn T. Beaman
Shawn T. Beaman