Summary: The main remit of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA) Pain Committee is to improve the quality of pain management in children. The ESPA Pain Management Ladder is a clinical practice advisory based upon expert consensus to help to ensure a basic standard of perioperative pain management for all children. Further steps are suggested to improve pain management once a basic standard has been achieved. The guidance is grouped by the type of surgical procedure and layered to suggest basic, intermediate, and advanced pain management methods. The committee members are aware that there are marked differences in financial and personal resources in different institutions and countries and also considerable variations in the availability of analgesic drugs across Europe. We recommend that the guidance should be used as a framework to guide best practice.

Summary: The growing number of medical procedures performed in children that require cooperation of patients, lack of movement, anxiolysis or/and analgesia triggers the increased need for procedural sedation. This document presents the consensus statement of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology about the principles connected with the safe management of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) by anaesthesiologists for elective procedures in children. It does not aim to provide a legal statement on how and by whom PSA should be performed. The document highlights that any staff taking part in sedation of children must be appropriately trained with the required competencies and must be able to demonstrate regularly that they have maintained their knowledge, skills and clinical experience. The main goal of creating this document was to reflect the opinions of the community of the paediatric anaesthesiologists in Europe regarding how PSA for paediatric patients should be organized to make it safe.

The ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative is a clinical practice advisory based upon expert consensus supported by the current literature to help ensure a basic standard of perioperative pain management for all children. In 2018 the perioperative pain management of six common pediatric surgical procedures was summarised. The current Pain Management Ladder recommendations focus on five more complex pediatric surgical procedures and suggest basic, intermediate, and advanced pain management methods. The aim of this paper is to encourage best possible pain management practice and to support institutions to create their own pain management concepts according to their financial and human resources due to the diversity of clinical settings in Europe. Furthermore, the authors underline that these recommendations are intended for inpatients only.

Background: Caudal anesthesia is an important regional anesthetic technique in neonates. The placement of a catheter can provide excellent analgesia for a prolonged period; the role of adjuvants, in particular morphine, however, remains unclear. We aimed to describe our experience with caudal catheters for major surgery in neonates. Methods: We included all neonates who had a caudal catheter placed for major abdominal and thoracic surgery and explored postoperative pain management and catheter complications. This retrospective case series included neonates with caudal catheter placement from October 2012 to April 2018 at a tertiary university hospital. Results: A total of 33 caudal catheter placements in 32 neonates were included in this study, of which 28 (85%) were a laparotomy and 5 (15%) a thoracotomy. The mean catheter duration was 135 h with a postoperative failure rate of 3%. Patients who did not receive intravenous opioids postoperatively had a significantly shorter stay in the intensive care unit than those who did (341 h vs. 674 h, p = 0.01). All patients received continuous local anesthetics over the catheter, and 79% received additional intermittent epidural morphine postoperatively for a median period of 42 h. No infectious complications were reported. Conclusions: Caudal catheters are a valuable option for perioperative analgesia for major surgery in neonates. We found no serious catheter-related complication. Further research is needed to define the optimal approach and combination of different analgesic techniques.

We thank Dr Haydar and colleagues for their comments on our article and we appreciate their interest and expertise in this field. We note their support for the concept of providing a framework for improvement in care. They make specific points about caudal epidural clonidine, outcomes, risk‐benefit balance, use of ultrasound guidance, and the possibility that pain assessment has caused overuse of opioids. We feel that they may have misunderstood some aspects of the nature and purpose of the ESPA Pain Management Ladder initiative and also have extrapolated unreasonably from experiences in adult practice and problems in the USA with inappropriate use of opioids.