Backgrounds and Objectives: To analyze the influence of multiple anti-VEGF intravitreal injections for exudative age-related macular degeneration on the thickness of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC + IPL) using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study of consecutive patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) was performed. Average and sectorial values of RNFL and GC + IPL thickness were recorded using Cirrus SD-OCT at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months. Patients suffering from any ocular disease that could affect RNFL or GC + IPL thickness were excluded. Results: A total of 135 patients (70 women and 65 men, aged 65 ± 15 years) were included. The average number of injections per patient was 12.4 ± 2.4. Average RNFL and GC + IPL thickness prior to the first injection (87.6 ± 12.2 and 47.2 ± 15.5 respectively), and after 24-month follow-up (86.2 ± 12.6 and 46.7 ± 11.9 respectively) did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). There was a significant decrease in GC2, GC5 segments, and minimum GC + IPL thickness. Conclusion: Repeated anti-VEGF treatment did not cause significant changes in the thickness of RNFL and GC + IPL layers over a period of 24 months. The detected decrease in GC2 and GC5 sectors, as well as in minimum GC + IPL thickness, could be a sign of ganglion cell damage induced by the treatment or could occur during the natural course of the disease.
Background/Objectives: Certain aspects of retinal thickness assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) require additional clarification. It is supposed that attributing reduced retinal thickness in PD to dopaminergic loss may not be acceptable as it also happens in diseases where dopaminergic loss does not occur. The objective of our study is to compare the ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), and macular thickness of PD and dopa responsive dystonia (DRD) patients with healthy controls (HC), to investigate whether DRD patients, as a distinctive model of genetically induced dopamine deficiency, have reduced retinal thickness in comparison with PD, and to analyze correlation between retinal thickness and various PD clinical parameters. Methods: We analyzed 86 patients with PD, 10 patients with DRD, and 96 age- and sex-matched HC. Results: GCIPL, pRNFL, and central macula thickness (CMT) are statistically significantly thinner in PD patients compared to HC (p < 0.001, all). GCIPL and CMT are also statistically significantly thinner in DRD patients compared to HC (p = 0.012, p = 0.001, respectively). GCIPL thickness correlates positively with the daily dose of levodopa (r = 0.244, p < 0.01). The thickness of GCIPL and pRNFL correlate negatively with current age (r = −0.219; p < 0.01 and r = −0.358; p < 0.05, respectively). All retinal parameters are statistically significantly thinner in females than in males (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with PD and DRD did not differ in GCIPL and pRNFL thickness when compared to one another. These results, supported by positive correlation of levodopa dose and GCIPL thickness in PD patients, emphasize the importance of dopamine in maintaining retinal thickness.
Background/Objectives: Clinical differentiation between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP) remains complex. Current diagnostic procedures helpful in their distinction lack specificity, making non-invasive tools like optical coherence tomography (OCT) crucial in evaluating possible retinal changes as potential biomarkers. Our study examined the thickness of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer complex (GCIPL), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular segments in individuals with PD, multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and healthy controls (HC). The objective of our study was to determine if OCT analyses can effectively discriminate PD patients from HC and whether retinal thickness can distinguish typical PD patients from those with AP. Methods: Research was an observational, cross-sectional study. Multiple retinal layers measured with OCT of PD and AP patients were compared with age- and sex-matched HC. An intergroup assessment was conducted. Results: Patients with PD and PSP exhibit a thinner GCIPL compared to HC, with no difference observed in the MSA group. GCIPL thickness between investigational groups does not differentiate between PD and AP. The RNFL and central macula thickness were statistically significantly reduced in all patient groups compared to HC. The RNFL was thinner in PSP compared to PD. Nearly all inner and outer macular segments were thinner in the investigational groups compared to HC. The preservation of outer nasal segments distinguished HC from both typical and AP. Patients with PSP and PD differed in the thickness of all macular segments, being thinner in PSP patients. Conclusions: Thickness of multiple retinal layers and macular regions might serve as a distinguishing feature between PD, AP and HC.
Background: Sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation using the Yamane technique is an option for visual rehabilitation in eyes without capsular support. The aim of this study is to report long-term visual outcomes and clinical predictors in consecutive real-world cohorts, a topic addressed by very few previous studies. Methods: This was a single-center, single-surgeon consecutive case series including 87 eyes of 85 patients who underwent Yamane SFIOL for aphakia or lens/posterior chamber IOL ectopia, with at least 12 months of follow-up. BCVA was measured using a Snellen chart and recorded in decimal notation. To identify predictors of postoperative BCVA, univariable screening was first performed, followed by a clinically driven multivariable linear mixed-effect regression. Results: Mean age was 68.2 ± 11.4 years, and 70.6% were male. Median follow-up was 26.5 months. Median BCVA improved from 0.2 ± 0.2 (range 0.001–1.0) preoperatively to 0.9 ± 0.2 (range 0.2–1.0) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Surgical indication and preoperative comorbidity burden were not linked to postoperative BCVA. In the multivariable analysis, older age (B = −0.005, p = 0.027), macular edema (B = −0.242, p = 0.035), and prior silicone oil removal (B = −0.237, p = 0.046) independently predicted lower postoperative BCVA. Conclusions: Yamane SFIOL provides significant long-term visual improvement, with outcomes mainly determined by patient age and retinal status. This study offers new data on functional outcomes and clinically relevant predictors in a consecutive real-world cohort, supporting the reliability and long-term efficacy of sutureless scleral IOL fixation.
Sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens fixation using the Yamane technique is an established option for visual rehabilitation in eyes without capsular support. This study evaluated long-term visual outcomes and predictors of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) following Yamane SFIOL implantation. In this single-center, single-surgeon consecutive case series, patients undergoing surgery for aphakia or lens/posterior chamber intraocular lens ectopia with ≥12 months of follow-up were included. BCVA was measured using a standard Snellen chart and recorded in decimal notation. Univariable screening followed by clinically driven multivariable linear mixed-effect regression was performed. Eighty-seven eyes of 85 patients were analyzed (mean age 68.2 ± 11.4 years; 70.6% male). Median BCVA improved significantly from 0.2 preoperatively to 0.9 postoperatively (p < 0.001), with a median follow-up of 26.5 months. Surgical indication was not associated with postoperative BCVA (B = −0.015, p = 0.752), nor was preoperative comorbidity burden. In multivariable analysis, older age (B = −0.005, p = 0.027), macular edema (B = −0.242, p = 0.035), and prior silicone oil removal (B = −0.237, p = 0.046) were independently associated with lower postoperative BCVA. Yamane SFIOL provides significant long-term visual improvement, while postoperative visual outcomes are primarily determined by age and retinal status.