Introduction: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygenation method has been proven to be successful in oxygenation of patients with respiratory failure and has exhibited clinical superiority compared to low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the potential favorable impact of HFNC oxygenation during bronchoscopy and related procedures like endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration. Only randomized control trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. Results: Six randomized control trials with 1,170 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients who underwent bronchoscopy with the use of high-flow nasal cannula experienced less hypoxemic events/desaturations, less procedural interruptions and pneumothoraxes compared to patients under low-flow nasal cannula treatment. This beneficial effect of HFNC in hypoxemic events was persistent 10 min after the end of procedure. Conclusion: The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygenation method could reduce hypoxemic events and related peri- and post-bronchoscopic complications.

Introduction: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 seem to be an emerging global crisis. Machine learning radiographic models have great potential for meticulous evaluation of post-COVID-19 interstitial lung disease (ILD).Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, we included consecutive patients that had been evaluated 3 months following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection between 01/02/2021 and 12/5/2022. High-resolution computed tomography was evaluated through Imbio Lung Texture Analysis 2.1.Results: Two hundred thirty-two (n = 232) patients were analyzed. FVC% predicted was ≥80, between 60 and 79 and <60 in 74.2% (n = 172), 21.1% (n = 49), and 4.7% (n = 11) of the cohort, respectively. DLCO% predicted was ≥80, between 60 and 79 and <60 in 69.4% (n = 161), 15.5% (n = 36), and 15.1% (n = 35), respectively. Extent of ground glass opacities was ≥30% in 4.3% of patients (n = 10), between 5 and 29% in 48.7% of patients (n = 113) and <5% in 47.0% of patients (n = 109). The extent of reticulation was ≥30%, 5–29% and <5% in 1.3% (n = 3), 24.1% (n = 56), and 74.6% (n = 173) of the cohort, respectively. Patients (n = 13, 5.6%) with fibrotic lung disease and persistent functional impairment at the 6-month follow-up received antifibrotics and presented with an absolute change of +10.3 (p = 0.01) and +14.6 (p = 0.01) in FVC% predicted at 3 and 6 months after the initiation of antifibrotic.Conclusion: Post-COVID-19-ILD represents an emerging entity. A substantial minority of patients presents with fibrotic lung disease and might experience benefit from antifibrotic initiation at the time point that fibrotic-like changes are “immature.” Machine learning radiographic models could be of major significance for accurate radiographic evaluation and subsequently for the guidance of therapeutic approaches.

Introduction: Treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often includes systemic corticosteroids. Use of steroid-sparing agents is amenable to avoid potential side effects. Methods: Functional indices and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) patterns of patients with non-IPF ILDs receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. Two independent radiologists and a machine learning software system (Imbio 1.4.2.) evaluated HRCT patterns. Results: Fifty-five (n = 55) patients were included in the analysis (male: 30 [55%], median age: 65.0 [95% CI: 59.7–70.0], mean forced vital capacity %predicted [FVC %pred.] ± standard deviation [SD]: 69.4 ± 18.3, mean diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide %pred. ± SD: 40.8 ± 14.3, hypersensitivity pneumonitis: 26, connective tissue disease-ILDs [CTD-ILDs]: 22, other ILDs: 7). There was no significant difference in mean FVC %pred. post-6 months (1.59 ± 2.04) and 1 year (−0.39 ± 2.49) of treatment compared to baseline. Radiographic evaluation showed no significant difference between baseline and post-1 year %ground glass opacities (20.0 [95% CI: 14.4–30.0] vs. 20.0 [95% CI: 14.4–25.6]) and %reticulation (5.0 [95% CI: 2.0–15.6] vs. 7.5 [95% CI: 2.0–17.5]). A similar performance between expert radiologists and Imbio software analysis was observed in assessing ground glass opacities (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.73) and reticulation (ICC = 0.88). Fourteen patients (25.5%) reported at least one side effect and 8 patients (14.5%) switched to antifibrotics due to disease progression. Conclusion: Our data suggest that MMF is a safe and effective steroid-sparing agent leading to disease stabilization in a proportion of patients with non-IPF ILDs. Machine learning software systems may exhibit similar performance to specialist radiologists and represent fruitful diagnostic and prognostic tools.

Background: Accurate and timely molecular testing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is mandatory for targeted therapies and improved outcomes. Real-world obstacles, including geographic distance from specialized lung cancer services, along with comorbidities, may delay molecular diagnosis and subsequent treatment, therefore hampering survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-departmental observational study of 927 patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC that were referred to a tertiary hospital in western Greece between January 2021 and December 2024. Patients were classified based on distance of residence (<30 km vs. ≥30 km). Clinical characteristics, time elapsed from pathological to final molecular diagnosis, and survival outcomes were analyzed and compared. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors of overall survival. Results: Patients residing ≥30 km away (61.2%) experienced delays in molecular testing (median 31 vs. 26 days, p = 0.002) and were less likely to undergo such testing (p = 0.012) compared to those residing 30 km also had a higher prevalence of COPD (42.5% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.002). Median survival from initial pathological diagnosis to death was significantly shorter in non-urban patients (129 vs. 215 days, p = 0.010). A molecular testing delay >35 days was independently associated with worse survival (HR = 0.684, 95% CI: 0.508–0.923, p = 0.013). No differences in TNM stage distribution were observed between geographical groups. Conclusions: Geographic disparities significantly impact access to advanced lung cancer services and molecular diagnostics and may provisionally affect prognosis in NSCLC. Improving testing pathways, incorporating reflex testing in pathological molecular analysis, and optimizing referral systems in rural areas may help to reduce inequalities and improve patient outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Despite the devastating impact of acute exacerbations of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (AE-fILDs), established treatment strategies are majorly lacking. The therapeutic potential of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in AE-fILDs was explored considering its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, as well as the immunocompromised status of fILD patients and the high frequency of infections that AE-fILDs triggers. Materials and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study. We investigated the therapeutic potential of IVIG in patients hospitalized for AE-fILDs between May 2021 and November 2024. Results: We included 39 patients diagnosed with AE-fILDs. All patients received IVIG (total dose of 1 g/kg, divided into three daily doses), pulse corticosteroids for three days and broad-spectrum antibiotics. No adverse events were considered to be related to IVIG therapy during the study period. The in-hospital and the 90-day mortality were 10 (26%) and 13 (33%) patients, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (74%) were discharged and 18 of them (62%) were in need of long-term oxygen therapy. The mean PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (P/F ratio) was 183 mmHg on admission and 294 mmHg on discharge (t-test, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This study suggests a potential therapeutic signal, indicating that IVIG is a relatively harmless, well-tolerated, and a potentially effective add-on treatment to current therapeutic approaches. Further research is essential to clarify the role of IVIG, determine optimal treatment protocols, and assess its efficacy in different ILD subtypes.

Background: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) represents a chronic lung disease with an unpredictable clinical course. There is a pressing need for clinically applicable prognostic biomarkers in patients with HP. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study. We investigated the prognostic potential of complete blood count parameters in treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with HP between 15 December 2010 and 1 October 2023. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the optimal cut-off thresholds for each parameter in terms of mortality prediction. Results: We included 129 patients diagnosed with HP [median age: 68.0 years (95% CI: 65.0 to 69.0), fibrotic HP: n = 85, 65.9%]. Patients with HP and an eosinophil count > 160 cells/μL [ROC curve, area under curve (AUC): 0.61] exhibited increased mortality risk compared to patients with HP and an eosinophil count ≤ 160 cells/μL [Kaplan–Meier, HR: 2.95 (95% CI: 1.36 to 6.42), p = 0.006]. Patients with HP and a monocyte count > 350 cells/μL (ROC curve, AUC: 0.52) had worse survival compared to patients with HP and a monocyte count lower than this threshold [Kaplan–Meier, HR: 2.48 (95% CI: 1.03 to 5.09), p = 0.04]. Patients with HP and an eosinophil–lymphocyte ratio (ELR) > 0.09 (ROC curve, AUC: 0.64) had a higher risk of mortality compared to patients with HP and ELR ≤ 0.09 [Kaplan–Meier, HR: 2.75 (95% CI: 1.3 to 5.78), p = 0.008]. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that eosinophil count, monocyte count, and ELR could be prognostic biomarkers in patients with HP. Further studies aiming to validate the prognostic potential of complete blood count parameters in patients with HP are greatly anticipated.