Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Older patients with cancer are increased risk of adverse outcomes. A geriatric assessment (GA) is a compilation of reliable and validated tools to assess domains that are predictors of morbidity and mortality, and it can be used to guide interventions. However, implementation of GA and GA-driven interventions is low due to resource and time limitations. GA-driven interventions delivered through a mobile application (app) may support the complex needs of older patients with cancer and their caregivers. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of a novel mobile app (TouchStream) and to identify barriers to its use. As an exploratory aim, we gathered preliminary data on symptom burden, healthcare utilization, and satisfaction. Methods: In a single-site pilot study, we included patients aged ≥65 years undergoing treatment for systemic cancer and/or their caregivers. TouchStream consists of a mobile app and a Web portal. Patients underwent a GA at baseline with the study team (on paper) and the results were used to guide interventions delivered through the app. A tablet preloaded with the app was provided for use at home for 4 weeks. Feasibility metrics included usability (system usability scale of >68 is considered above average), recruitment, retention (number of subjects consented who completed post-intervention assessments), and percentage (%) of days subjects used the app. For the last 8 patients, we assessed their symptom burden (severity and interference; 17-items scored from 0-10, higher score indicates worse symptoms) using a clinical symptom inventory, healthcare utilization from the electronic medical records, and satisfaction (6 items scored on a 5-point Likert Scale, higher score indicates higher satisfaction; both patients and caregivers) using a modified satisfaction survey. Barriers to use were elicited through interviews. Results: A total of 18 patients (mean age 77, range 68-87) and 13 caregivers (70, 38-81) completed baseline assessment. Recruitment and retention rates were 67% and 80%, respectively. Mean SUS score was 74 for patients and 72 for caregivers. Mean % of days the TouchStream app was used was 79%. Mean symptom severity and interference scores were 1.6 and 2.8 at pre-intervention, and 0.9 and 1.5 at post-intervention, respectively. There was a total of 27 clinic calls during the intervention period and 15 during the post-intervention period (week 5-8). One patient was hospitalized during the intervention period (week 1-4) and two patients during the post-intervention period (week 5-8). Mean satisfaction scores of patients and caregivers with the mobile app were 20.4 and 23.4, respectively. Barriers fell into 3 themes: general experience, design, and functionality. Conclusions: TouchStream is feasible and usable for older patients on cancer treatment and their caregivers. Future studies should evaluate the effects of the TouchStream on symptoms and healthcare utilization in a randomized fashion.