Objective To evaluate the efficacy of selected ultrasound (US) features of thyroid focal lesions useful for establishing indications for fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) with regard to the lesion's size. Methods US imaging features of 1141 thyroid nodules (shape, echogenicity, pattern of blood flow, presence of microcalcifications and the presence of other nodules in the thyroid) and their palpability were compared with the post-operative histopathological outcomes. The efficacy of the selected sets of the features was assessed for small nodules (SN)≤15 mm and large nodules (LN)>15 mm, as well as separately for nodules≤10 mm. Results Logistic regression analysis showed that in SN hypoechogenicity (odds ratios, OR: 3.18), microcalcifications (OR: 19.12), solitary occurrence (OR: 3.29) and height-to-width ratio≥1 (OR: 8.57) were independent risk factors for malignancy. The optimal set of small lesions that should be biopsied includes all lesions presenting at least one of the above-mentioned features (sensitivity 98%, specificity 44%). In the LN group, the selection criteria based on the shape of lesions and hypoechogenicity were less sensitive than in the SN group, but they allowed further reduction in the number of performed FNABs. Large nodules primarily selected for FNAB should be hypoechoic, more tall then wide or contain microcalcifications (sensitivity 84%, specificity 72%). Conclusions The obtained results provide rationale for using features from the US examination in selecting both small and large nodules for FNAB. In the case of LN, the usefulness of sonographic features is less sensitive, but more specific than in the case of SN.

The aim was to compare the usefulness of selected thyroid sonographic risk-stratification systems in the diagnostics of nodules with indeterminate/suspicious cytology or unequivocal cytology in a population with a history of iodine deficiency. The diagnostic efficacy of ACR-TIRADS (the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems), EU-TIRADS (European Thyroid Association TIRADS), Korean-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, AACE/ACE-AME-guidelines (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/ American College of Endocrinology-Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines) and ATA-guidelines (American Thyroid Association guidelines) was evaluated in 1000 nodules with determined histopathological diagnosis: 329 FLUS/AUS (10.6% cancers), 167 SFN/SHT (11.6% cancers), 44 SM (77.3% cancers), 298 BL (benign lesions), 162 MN (malignant neoplasms). The percentage of PTC (papillary thyroid carcinoma) among cancers was higher in Bethesda MN (86.4%) and SM (suspicion of malignancy) nodules (91.2%) than in FLUS/AUS (57.1%, p < 0.005) and SFN/SHT (suspicion of follicular neoplasm/ suspicion of Hürthle cell tumor) nodules (36.8%, p < 0.001). TIRADS efficacy was higher for MN (AUC: 0.827–0.874) and SM nodules (AUC: 0.775–0.851) than for FLUS/AUS (AUC: 0.655–0.701) or SFN/SHT nodules (AUC: 0.593–0.621). FLUS/AUS (follicular lesion of undetermined significance/ atypia of undetermined significance) nodules assigned to a high risk TIRADS category had malignancy risk of 25%. In the SFN/SHT subgroup none TIRADS category changed nodule’s malignancy risk. EU-TIRADS and AACE/ACE-AME-guidelines would allow diagnosing the highest number of PTC, FTC (follicular thyroid carcinoma), HTC (Hürthle cell carcinoma), MTC (medullary thyroid carcinoma). The highest OR value was for Kwak-TIRADS (12.6) and Korean-TIRADS (12.0). Conclusions: TIRADS efficacy depends on the incidence of PTC among cancers. All evaluated TIRADS facilitate the selection of FLUS/AUS nodules for the surgical treatment but these systems are not efficient in the management of SFN/SHT nodules.

Purpose The aim was to find whether the presence of Hürthle cells (HC) in a smear influences the categorization of FNA results or the risk of malignancy (RoM) of particular categories of cytological diagnosis. Methods 25,220 FNA performed in a single center in years 2005–2017 were analyzed. Almost all the examined patients were exposed to moderate iodine deficiency for most of their lives. The distribution of FNA outcome categories was compared between two groups: with or without HC (HC and non-HC). The RoM was evaluated on the basis of postoperative histopathological examination (3082 patients). Results HC were found in 7.5% of diagnostic FNA. HC nodules were classified into categories II (78.2% vs. 91.9%, p < 0.0000) and VI (0.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.0017) less often than non-HC nodules, but more frequently to categories III (14.4% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.0000), IV (11.2% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.0000) and V (1.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.0013). There were no significant differences in RoM between HC and non-HC nodules. The RoM in HC and non-HC nodules of particular categories of the Bethesda system was as follows: II: 1.8% vs. 0.8%, III: 9.7% vs. 3.8% when only the last FNA was considered and 10.8% vs. 6.4% when the category III in any performed FNA was considered; IV: 12.7% vs. 10.9%; V: 41.7% vs. 58.2%; and VI: 100% vs. 96.9%. Conclusions HC nodules are classified into categories of equivocal cytological outcomes more often than nodules without HC. Nevertheless, the presence of HC in a smear does not significantly affect the RoM of FNA categories.

Introduction: The aim of this investigation was to assess the usefulness of the measurement of PTH concentration in the material obtained during FNAB (PTH-FNAB) in the identification of pathological parathyroids in patients with frequently coexisting thyroid abnormalities (nodular goitre, chronic thyroiditis, previous thyroidectomy). Additionally, the influence of the size of goitre, parathyroid localisation and size on the results of PTH-FNAB measurement was examined. Material and methods: Fifty patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and sonographically detected focal lesion that was suggestive of parathyroid gland were included in this study. PTH-FNAB results were correlated with the outcome of routine cytological examination and biochemical indices of hyperparathyroidism, SPECT-CT (33 patients) and histopathological examination (20 patients). Results: Positive PTH-FNAB was observed in 80% of patients, and in more than 70% of persons with non-diagnostic smears or smears 'contaminated' with thyroid follicular cells. In the group of operated patients, sensitivity of PTH-FNAB (95.0%) was higher than SPECT-CT (64.3%, p < 0.05). Presence of nodular goitre and/or chronic thyroiditis exerts a two times stronger negative effect on percentage of negative results of SPECT-CT than of PTH-FNAB. On the other hand, lower frequency of positive PTH-FNAB but not SPECT-CT was observed when the thickness of the thyroid was >= 20 mm (50% v. 87.5%, p < 0.05) and when the thickness of a lesion suspected of parathyroid pathology was <= 5 mm (66.7% v. 93.3%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with thyroid abnormalities, PTH-FNAB measurements show advantages over routine biopsy and SPECT-CT in the identification of typically located pathological parathyroids.

Objective: New classification of the thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) results tries to stratify the risk of malignancy of thyroid follicular lesions using 'follicular lesion of undetermined significance' (FLUS) subcategory. Clinical significance of this category in the endemic (or post-endemic) areas has not been clearly established. Design: The aim of the study was to determine the risk of malignancy for FLUS as well as to evaluate ultrasound (US) malignancy risk features (MRF) in such nodules in comparison with 'suspicious for neoplasm' (SFN) and 'benign lesions' (BL). Methods: The US images and cytological diagnoses of 589 thyroid follicular lesions were analysed from January 2010 to July 2012. Cytological follow-up was assessed in 110 cases and surgical one in 100 cases. Results: FLUS was diagnosed in 340 cases (3.8% of all cytological diagnoses and 57% of thyroid follicular lesions). Altogether, clinical and/or surgical follow-up revealed thyroid cancer in 3.2% patients with FLUS nodules. Repeat FNAB led to more specific diagnosis in 74.4% of FLUS (3.5%, papillary cancers or their suspicion; 2.3%, SFN; 68.6%, BL). The histopathological examination showed thyroid cancer in 6.4% cases of FLUS and 7.0% of SFN and follicular adenoma in 8.5% of FLUS and 11.6% of SFN (NS, FLUS vs SFN). FLUS showed MRF of intermediate values between BL and SFN; SFN more often than FLUS showed at least two MRF (53 vs 30%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The risk of cancer in FLUS in areas with recently corrected iodine supply is low. In such areas, repeated biopsy leads to more precise cytological diagnosis in about 3/4 cases. European Journal of Endocrinology 168 621-630

The aim of the study was to examine the benefits of the joint use of repeat FNA (rFNA) and EU-TIRADS in category III nodules in relation to the kind of atypia: nuclear vs. architectural (denoted by AUS and FLUS respectively). The study included 127 AUS and 1739 FLUS nodules with a known category of EU-TIRADS. Repeat FNA was performed in 82 AUS and 934 FLUS nodules of which 57 and 515 were excised, respectively. AUS nodules had higher malignancy risk than FLUS nodules. EU-TIRADS showed higher accuracy for AUS nodules, the opposite to rFNA, that had higher accuracy for FLUS nodules. The combined criterion for AUS nodules (at least rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-4) maximized sensitivity (92.3%) with acceptable specificity (70.0%); OR: 28.0. In the case of FLUS nodules, the combined criterion (rFNA-V or EU-TIRADS-5) maximized specificity (95.2%) with 57.7% sensitivity and a low percentage (13.9%) of positive nodules, OR: 27.0. In both types of nodules, the low risk category in EU-TIRADS and benign result of rFNA excluded cancer. Concluding, category III nodules with and without nuclear atypia differ in their risk of malignancy and, consequently, diagnostic criteria adopted for the evaluation of these nodules with rFNA and EU-TIRADS should be specific to AUS and FLUS nodules.