Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a highly malignant tumor that may not only contain rhabdoid tumor cells but also poorly differentiated small‐round‐blue cells as well as areas with mesenchymal or epithelial differentiation. Little is known on factors associated with histopathological diversity. Recent studies demonstrated three molecular subgroups of AT/RT, namely ATRT‐TYR, ATRT‐SHH, and ATRT‐MYC. We thus aimed to investigate if morphological patterns might be related to molecular subgroup status. Hematoxylin‐eosin stained sections of 114 AT/RT with known molecular subgroup status were digitalized and independently categorized by nine blinded observers into four morphological categories, that is, “rhabdoid,” “small‐round‐blue,” “epithelial,” and “mesenchymal.” The series comprised 48 ATRT‐SHH, 40 ATRT‐TYR, and 26 ATRT‐MYC tumors. Inter‐observer agreement was moderate but significant (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.47; 95% C.I. 0.41‐0.53; p < 0.001) and there was a highly significant overall association between morphological categories and molecular subgroups for each of the nine observers (p < 0.0001). Specifically, the category “epithelial” was found to be over‐represented in ATRT‐TYR (p < 0.000001) and the category “small‐round‐blue” to be over‐represented in ATRT‐SHH (p < 0.01). The majority of ATRT‐MYC was categorized as “mesenchymal” or “rhabdoid,” but this association was less compelling. The specificity of the category “epithelial” for ATRT‐TYR was highest and accounted for 97% (range: 88‐99%) whereas sensitivity was low [49% (range: 35%–63%)]. In line with these findings, cytokeratin‐positivity was highly overrepresented in ATRT‐TYR. In conclusion, morphological features of AT/RT might reflect molecular alterations and may also provide a first hint on molecular subgroup status, which will need to be confirmed by DNA methylation profiling.
Introduction: Malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) predominantly affect infants and young children. Patients below six months of age represent a particularly therapeutically challenging group. Toxicity to developing organ sites limits intensity of treatment. Information on prognostic factors, genetics, toxicity of treatment and long-term outcomes is sparse. Methods: Clinical, genetic, and treatment data of 100 patients (aged below 6 months at diagnosis) from 13 European countries were analyzed (2005–2020). Tumors and matching blood samples were examined for SMARCB1 mutations using FISH, MLPA and Sanger sequencing. DNA methylation subgroups (ATRT-TYR, ATRT-SHH, and ATRT-MYC) were determined using 450 k / 850 k-profiling. Results: A total of 45 patients presented with ATRT, 29 with extracranial, extrarenal (eMRT) and 9 with renal rhabdoid tumors (RTK). Seventeen patients demonstrated synchronous tumors (SYN). Metastases (M+) were present in 27% (26/97) at diagnosis. A germline mutation (GLM) was detected in 55% (47/86). DNA methylation subgrouping was available in 50% (31 / 62) with ATRT or SYN; for eMRT, methylation-based subgrouping was not performed. The 5-year overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) rates were 23.5 ± 4.6% and 19 ± 4.1%, respectively. Male sex (11 ± 5% vs. 35.8 ± 7.4%), M+ stage (6.1 ± 5.4% vs. 36.2 ± 7.4%), presence of SYN (7.1 ± 6.9% vs. 26.6 ± 5.3%) and GLM (7.7 ± 4.2% vs. 45.7 ± 8.6%) were significant prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Molecular subgrouping and survival analyses confirm a previously described survival advantage for ATRT-TYR. In an adjusted multivariate model, clinical factors that favorably influence the prognosis were female sex, localized stage, absence of a GLM and maintenance therapy. Conclusions: In this cohort of homogenously treated infants with MRT, significant predictors of outcome were sex, M-stage, GLM and maintenance therapy. We confirm the need to stratify which patient groups benefit from multimodal treatment, and which need novel therapeutic strategies. Biomarker-driven tailored trials may be a key option.
1 February 2020 in Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Mutations in chromatin remodelling genes occur in approximately 25% of all human tumours (Kadoch et al. Nat Genet 45: 592–601, 2013). The spectrum of alterations is broad and comprises single nucleotide variants, insertion/deletions and more complex structural variations. The single most often affected remodelling complex is the SWI/SNF complex (SWItch/sucrose non‐fermentable). In the field of paediatric neuro‐oncology, the spectrum of affected genes implicated in epigenetic remodelling is narrower with SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 being the most frequent. The low mutation frequencies in many of the SWI/SNF mutant entities underline the fact that perturbed chromatin remodelling is the most salient factor in tumourigenesis and could thus be a potential therapeutic opportunity. Here, I review the genetic basis of aberrant chromatin remodelling in paediatric brain tumours and discuss their impact on the epigenome in the respective entities, mainly medulloblastomas and rhabdoid tumours.
Background: Adrenocortical tumors (ACTs) encompassing the adrenocortical adenoma (ACA), carcinoma (ACC), and tumors of undetermined malignant potential (ACx) are rare endocrine neoplasms with a poor prognosis. We report on pediatric ACT patients registered with the Malignant Endocrine Tumor studies and explore the EXPeRT recommendations for management. Patients: Data from the ACT patients (<18 years) were analyzed. For the risk prediction, the patients were retrospectively assigned to the COG stages and the five-item score. Results: By December 2021, 161 patients with ACT (ACA n = 51, ACx n = 19, and ACC n = 91) had been reported (the median age at the diagnosis was 4.3 years with a range of 0.1–17.8), with lymph node and distant metastases in 10.7% and 18.9% of the patients with ACC/ACx. The mean follow-up was 4.5 years (with a range of 0–16.7). The three-year overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 65.5% and 50.6%. In the univariate analyses, the OS was impaired for patients aged ≥ 4 years (p = 0.001) with the initial biopsy (p = 0.016), tumor spillage (p = 0.028), incomplete tumor resection (p < 0.001), unfavorable histology (p = 0.047), and COG stages III/IV (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed COG stages III/IV and an unfavorable five-item score as independent negative prognostic factors for the EFS and OS. Conclusions: Age defines the clinical presentation and prognosis in pediatric ACTs. The outcome is best predicted by the COG stage and five-item score.
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumour among adult patients and represents an almost universally fatal disease. Novel therapies for GBM are being developed under the orphan drug legislation and the knowledge on the molecular makeup of this disease has been increasing rapidly. However, the clinical outcomes in GBM patients with currently available therapies are still dismal. An insight into the current drug development pipeline for GBM is therefore of particular interest. Objectives: To provide a quantitative clinical-regulatory insight into the status of FDA orphan drug designations for compounds intended to treat GBM. Methods: Quantitative cross-sectional analysis of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Orphan Drug Product database between 1983 and 2020. STROBE criteria were respected. Results: Four orphan drugs out of 161 (2,4%) orphan drug designations were approved for the treatment for GBM by the FDA between 1983 and 2020. Fourteen orphan drug designations were subsequently withdrawn for unknown reasons. The number of orphan drug designations per year shows a growing trend. In the last decade, the therapeutic mechanism of action of designated compounds intended to treat glioblastoma shifted from cytotoxic drugs (median year of designation 2008) to immunotherapeutic approaches and small molecules (median year of designation 2014 and 2015 respectively) suggesting an increased focus on precision in the therapeutic mechanism of action for compounds the development pipeline. Conclusion: Despite the fact that current pharmacological treatment options in GBM are sparse, the drug development pipeline is steadily growing. In particular, the surge of designated immunotherapies detected in the last years raises the hope that elaborate combination possibilities between classical therapeutic backbones (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and novel, currently experimental therapeutics may help to provide better therapies for this deadly disease in the future.
The clinical use of bone marrow derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) in different settings ranging from tissue engineering to immunotherapies has prompted investigations on the properties of these cells in a variety of other tissues. Particularly the role of MSCs in solid tumors has been the subject of many experimental approaches. While a clear phenotypical distinction of tumor associated fibroblasts (TAFs) and MSCs within the tumor microenvironment is still missing, the homing of bone marrow MSCs in tumor sites has been extensively studied. Both, tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting effects of BM-MSCs have been described in this context. This ambiguity requires a reappraisal of the different studies and experimental methods employed. Here, we review the current literature on tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting effects of BM-MSCs with a particular emphasis on their interplay with components of the immune system and also highlight a potential role of MSCs as cell of origin for certain mesenchymal tumors.