Elderly patients undergoing pathophysiological changes necessitate clinical tools for cerebral monitoring. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to explore how cerebral monitoring using Δo₂Hbi, ΔHHbi, and ΔcHbi manifests in elderly patients under either propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Single-center, prospective, randomization. A single tertiary hospital (Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea). Enrolled 100 patients scheduled for urologic surgery under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were (a) age 70-80 years, (b) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. Patients were double-blind randomized to receive propofol-based or sevoflurane anesthesia. Cerebral oximetry-related parameters were measured at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in a setting devoid of surgery-related factors. The primary outcome focused on the Δo₂Hbi pattern in the left and right sides within the propofol and sevoflurane groups. We analyzed 100 patients, 50 patients in each group. In the propofol group, the left Δo₂Hbi decreased from 1.4 (3.7) at 5 min to -0.1 (1.8) at 30 min (P < 0.0001), and the right Δo₂Hbi decreased from 2.9 (4.2) at 5 min to -0.06 (2.3) at 30 min (P < 0.0001). In the sevoflurane group, the left Δo₂Hbi decreased from 1.1 (3.4) at 5 min to -1.4 (4.4) at 30 min (P < 0.0001), and the right Δo₂Hbi decreased from 2.0 (3.2) at 5 min to -1.2 (3.9) at 30 min (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups. ΔHHbi did not exhibit significant changes after an initial decrease at 5 min and showed no significant differences between the two groups. In cerebral oximetry, Δo₂Hbi and ΔHHbi could emerge as a valuable approach for discerning changes in the underlying baseline status of the brain in elderly patients during anesthesia.

In patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with immediate postoperative extubation in the operating room (OR), rapid recovery of consciousness and spontaneous ventilation are essential, requiring effective analgesia without compromising respiratory function. This study evaluated whether intraoperative nefopam administration improves early postoperative pain control and reduces opioid consumption in this physiologically distinct population. A retrospective cohort of 376 adult LDLT recipients who met the criteria for OR extubation was analyzed. After propensity score matching, 182 patients who received intraoperative nefopam were compared with 182 matched controls. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and total fentanyl consumption and opioid-related complications were recorded over the first 24 h postoperatively. Nefopam administration was associated with significantly lower VAS scores during the first 12 h after surgery (p < 0.001) and reduced 24 h fentanyl consumption (53.2 ± 20.8 mL vs. 58.6 ± 27.5 mL, p = 0.035). No serious adverse effects related to nefopam were observed. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the groups. These findings indicate that nefopam offers effective early analgesia and an opioid-sparing effect in LDLT recipients undergoing OR extubation, suggesting its clinical utility as a component of multimodal analgesia in this high-risk group. Although the reduction in opioid use did not translate into a decreased incidence of opioid-related complications, the favorable safety profile and analgesic efficacy of nefopam support further investigation through prospective trials to define its role in enhanced recovery protocols for OR-extubated LDLT recipients.