Laura Carrassa

Dr. Laura Carrassa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLaura Carrassa
Laura Carrassa
Giovanna DamiaGiovanna Damia
Giovanna Damia

9 April 2001 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanna DamiaGiovanna Damia
Giovanna Damia
SSSimonetta Silvestri
Simonetta Silvestri
LCLaura Carrassa
Laura Carrassa
LFLaura Filiberti
Laura Filiberti
GFGlynn T. Faircloth
Glynn T. Faircloth
Maurizio D'IncalciMaurizio D'Incalci
Maurizio D'Incalci
The cytotoxic activity of ecteinascidin 743 (ET‐743), a natural product derived from the marine tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata that exhibits potent anti‐tumor activity in pre‐clinical systems and promising activity in phase I and II clinical trials, was investigated in a number of cell systems with well‐defined deficiencies in DNA‐repair mechanisms. ET‐743 binds to N2 of guanine in the minor groove, but its activity does not appear to be related to DNA‐topoisomerase I poisoning as the drug is equally active in wild‐type yeast and in yeast with a deletion in the DNA‐topoisomerase I gene. Defects in the mismatch repair pathway, usually associated with increased resistance to methylating agents and cisplatin, did not affect the cytotoxic activity of ET‐743. However, ET‐743 did show decreased activity (from 2‐ to 8‐fold) in nucleotide excision repair (NER)–deficient cell lines compared to NER‐proficient cell lines, from either hamsters or humans. Restoration of NER function sensitized cells to ET‐743 treatment. The DNA double‐strand‐break repair pathway was also investigated using human glioblastoma cell lines MO59K and MO59J, respectively, proficient and deficient in DNA‐dependent protein kinase (DNA‐PK). ET‐743 was more effective in cells lacking DNA‐PK; moreover, pre‐treatment of HCT‐116 colon carcinoma cells with wortmannin, a potent inhibitor of DNA‐PK, sensitized cells to ET‐743. An increase in ET‐743 sensitivity was also observed in ataxia telangiectasia–mutated cells. Our data strongly suggest that ET‐743 has a unique mechanism of interaction with DNA.

1 January 2018 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTChiara Tarantelli
Chiara Tarantelli
EGEugenio Gaudio
Eugenio Gaudio
AAAlberto J. Arribas
Alberto J. Arribas
IKIvo Kwee
Ivo Kwee
PHPetra Hillmann
Petra Hillmann
Francesco BertoniFrancesco Bertoni
Francesco Bertoni
Purpose: Activation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway is recurrent in different lymphoma types, and pharmacologic inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway has shown activity in lymphoma patients. Here, we extensively characterized the in vitro and in vivo activity and the mechanism of action of PQR309 (bimiralisib), a novel oral selective dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor under clinical evaluation, in preclinical lymphoma models. Experimental Design: This study included preclinical in vitro activity screening on a large panel of cell lines, both as single agent and in combination, validation experiments on in vivo models and primary cells, proteomics and gene-expression profiling, and comparison with other signaling inhibitors. Results: PQR309 had in vitro antilymphoma activity as single agent and in combination with venetoclax, panobinostat, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, ARV-825, marizomib, and rituximab. Sensitivity to PQR309 was associated with specific baseline gene-expression features, such as high expression of transcripts coding for the BCR pathway. Combining proteomics and RNA profiling, we identified the different contribution of PQR309-induced protein phosphorylation and gene expression changes to the drug mechanism of action. Gene-expression signatures induced by PQR309 and by other signaling inhibitors largely overlapped. PQR309 showed activity in cells with primary or secondary resistance to idelalisib. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, PQR309 appeared as a novel and promising compound that is worth developing in the lymphoma setting. Clin Cancer Res; 1–10. ©2017 AACR.

1 July 2012 in Cell Cycle
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLaura Carrassa
Laura Carrassa
RCRosaria Chilà
Rosaria Chilà
MLMonica Lupi
Monica Lupi
Francesca RicciFrancesca Ricci
Francesca Ricci
CCCinzia Celenza
Cinzia Celenza
Giovanna DamiaGiovanna Damia
Giovanna Damia
Targeting Chk1 protein kinase can enhance the antitumor effects of radio- and chemotherapy. Recent evidence disclosed a role of Chk1 in unperturbed cell proliferation and survival, implying that Chk1 inhibitors could also be effective as single agents in tumors with a specific genetic background. To identify genes in synthetic lethality with Chk1, we did a high-throughput screening using a siRNA library directed against 719 human protein kinases in the human ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-5, resistant to Chk1 inhibitors. Wee1 tyrosine kinase was the most significant gene in synthetic lethality with Chk1. Treatment with non-toxic concentrations of a Chk1 inhibitor (PF-00477736) and a Wee1 inhibitor (MK-1775) confirmed the marked synergistic effect in various human cancer cell lines (breast, ovarian, colon, prostate), independently of the p53 status. Detailed molecular analysis showed that the combination caused cancer cells to undergo premature mitosis before the end of DNA replication, with damaged DNA leading to cell death partly by apoptosis. In vivo treatment of mice bearing OVCAR-5 xenografts with the combination of Chk1 and Wee1 inhibitors led to greater tumor growth inhibition than with the inhibitors used as single agents with no toxicity. These data provide a strong rationale for the clinical investigation of the combination of a Chk1 and a Wee1 inhibitor.

1 July 2011 in Cell Cycle
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LCLaura Carrassa
Laura Carrassa
Giovanna DamiaGiovanna Damia
Giovanna Damia
The checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is one of the major players in the signal transduction pathway set in motion in response to DNA damage which activates different cell cycle checkpoints including the G1/S, the intra-S, G2-M and the mitotic spindle checkpoint, contributing to the maintenance of genomic stability. Chk1 is considered a good molecular target to inhibit, in combination with other anticancer agents, to increase the sensitivity of treatment, especially in tumors with a defective G1 checkpoint. Experimental evidence highlights the essential role of Chk1 in normal and cancer cells even under unstressed conditions, especially in controlling DNA replication and cell division. This review looks at the main functions of Chk1 and the data on Chk1 inhibitors at their preclinical and clinical development are reported. This information may suggest novel approaches for new treatments with Chk1 inhibitors in combination with anticancer agents or as single agents. The emergent synthetic lethality approach may help define the genetic background features where Chk1 inhibitors alone could be very effective.

1 January 2001 in Neoplasia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Giovanna DamiaGiovanna Damia
Giovanna Damia
LFLaura Filiberti
Laura Filiberti
FVFaina Vikhanskaya
Faina Vikhanskaya
LCLaura Carrassa
Laura Carrassa
YTYoichi Taya
Yoichi Taya
Massimo BrogginiMassimo Broggini
Massimo Broggini
Posttranslational modifications of p53 induced by two widely used anticancer agents, cisplatinum (DDP) and taxol were investigated in two human cancer cell lines. Although both drugs were able to induce phosphorylation at serine 20 (Ser20), only DDP treatment induced p53 phosphorylation at serine 15 (Ser15). Moreover, both drug treatments were able to increase p53 levels and consequently the transcription of waf1 and mdm-2 genes, although DDP treatment resulted in a stronger inducer of both genes. Using two ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) cell lines, the role of ATM in drug-induced p53 phosphorylations was investigated. No differences in drug-induced p53 phosphorylation could be observed, indicating that ATM is not the kinase involved in these phosphorylation events. In addition, inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase activity by wortmannin did not abolish p53 phosphorylation at Ser15 and Ser20, again indicating that DNA-PK is unlikely to be the kinase involved. After both taxol and DDP treatments, an activation of hCHK2 was found and this is likely to be responsible for phosphorylation at Ser20. In contrast, only DDP was able to activate ATR, which is the candidate kinase for phosphorylation of Ser15 by this drug. This data clearly suggests that differential mechanisms are involved in phosphorylation and activation of p53 depending on the drug type.