Hao Fan

Mr. Hao Fan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 April 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLaihu Peng
Laihu Peng
HFHao Fan
Hao Fan
YQYubao Qi
Yubao Qi
JLJianQiang Li
JianQiang Li
Solid ink density is an important control parameter in the manufacturing process of offset prints—the size of which has a significant impact on the color performance of the prints—in which the determination of the optimal solid ink density is critical for the pre-press phase of industrial production. Compared with the traditional method of determining the optimal solid ink density, the current printing equipment used to determine the optimal solid ink density will be faster at improving industrial production efficiency and product quality. To improve the efficiency of determining the optimal solid ink density, the Random Forest algorithm was applied for the first time to the prediction task of solid ink density in offset printing. An optimal solid ink density prediction model for lithographic offset printing is established, and the L*a*b* colorimetric values of CMY three-color prints are used as inputs for training through hyperparameter optimization of the model. The experimental data show that the relevant evaluation metrics MAE, RMSE, MSE, and R2 of the model are within the reliable range. A comparison between the proposed prediction model and several mainstream machine-learning algorithms indicates that the Random Forest model performs superiorly in both the coefficient of determination (R2) and the mean squared error (MSE). Specifically, the Random Forest model achieved an R2 value of 0.969, reflecting improvements of 27.5%, 1.89%, 3.8%, and 34.02% compared to artificial neural network, gradient boosting, polynomial regression, and support vector regression models, respectively. In terms of MSE, the model reduced prediction error by 87.1%, 36.2%, 55.4%, and 89.2%, respectively, when compared with the same models. This approach has proven to provide both theoretical support and a practical pathway for enhancing the level of intelligence in pre-press process control, demonstrating significant practical application value.