Background: Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and cytology are both independent and strong prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. This study aims to highlight the impact of LVSI and cytology positivity on prognosis, in addition to molecular classification. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the records of 223 patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2021. The inclusion criteria stipulated that the patients were diagnosed with endometrial cancer by endometrial biopsy and were operated in the clinic. The exclusion criteria included sarcoma in the postoperative pathology report results or synchronous tumor. Staging was performed according to the Fédération internationale de gynécologie et d'obstétrique (FIGO) 2009 criteria. Cytology (using 50 cc saline) was obtained upon entry into the peritoneal cavity. In 20 patients, saline was not used due to the presence of ascites in the abdomen. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to evaluate overall survival and progression-free survival. Survival rates were compared in terms of cytology and LVSI. Results: After analyzing the postoperative pathology results, it was found that the mean tumor size was 4.03 ± 2.3 cm. The most common histological type was endometrioid carcinoma, with stage IA being the most common stage. Out of 223 patients with endometrial cancer, the overall survival rate was 82.4%, and the progression-free survival rate was 88.3%. For patients negative for LVSI, the progression-free survival rate was 93%, while for LVSI-positive patients, it was 77.3% (p < 0.001). Additionally, the progression-free survival rate for patients negative for cytology was 90.4%, whereas for cytology-positive patients, it was 77.1% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In our study, we observed that LVSI positivity and cytology positivity also reduced the overall survival rate. We aimed to highlight that, in addition to molecular classification, cytology positivity and LVSI positivity are still highly significant and independent factors in prognosis.

This study aims to investigate the role of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) in the prognostic assessment of endometrial cancers that have been depicted as having no specific molecular profile (NSMP) in molecular classification. This is a retrospective review of 150 patients who received the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and underwent surgery at the study center between January 2008 and January 2022. When evaluating L1CAM immunohistochemical staining, scoring was done according to the percentage of positivity in tumor cells. Accordingly, score 0 = 0%, score 1=1% to 10%, score 2 = >10% to 50% and score 3 = >50%. If the staining in tumor cells was ≥10% (scores 2 and 3), it was considered positive. The patients with L1CAM positivity had significantly more frequent lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node metastasis than patients with L1CAM negativity (P = 0.013 and P = 0.007). L1CAM expression was strongly associated with mutant p53 (P = 0.003). Recurrence was significantly higher (P = 0.001) and overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly lower in patients with L1CAM positivity (P = 0.001 for both). Seventy-nine patients (52.7%) were put into NSMP group. About 84.8% of them (n = 67) were L1CAM negative and 15.2% of them (n = 12) were L1CAM-positive. Recurrence was significantly higher (P = 0.001) and overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly lower in patients with NSMP who were positive for L1CAM (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). This study demonstrates that L1CAM expression status may add prognostic information to endometrial cancer, particularly in the NSMP subgroup. Considering the prognostic importance of L1CAM, its use as a marker may make significant contributions to reducing prognostic heterogeneity, especially in the NSMP subgroup.

The aim of this study was to compare the power of preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography, intraoperative macroscopic examination, and frozen section for predicting deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

Background: To emphasize the effect of molecular markers on prognosis in endometrial cancer, in addition to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 classification. Methods: The records of 160 patients with endometrial cancer between 2008 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Staging was done according to FIGO 2009 criteria. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to molecular classification. If one had polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutation, the patient was included in POLE ultramutated (POLEmut) group. In case of intakt POLE, but abnormal staining of mismatch repair (MMR), the group was diagnosed as mismatch repair defciency (MMRd). If there was only p53 abnormal results detected, that group was p53-abnormal (p53mut). If no mutation at all, that group was categorized as non-specific molecular profile (NSMP). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival and progression-free survival. Survival rates were compared for molecular markers. Results: According to the molecular analysis, 4 patients (2.5%) were classifed as POLEmut group, 53 patients (33.1%) in the MMRd group, 18 patients (11.3%) had p53mut, and 85 patients (53.1%) into the NSMP group. 5-year overall survival was 79.4%, 5-year progression-free survival was 90%. 5-year overall survival was 75% in POLEmut group, 84.9% in MMRd group, 38.9% in p53mut group and 84.7% in NSMP group (p = 0.001). 5-year progression-free survival was 100% in POLEmut group, 96.2% in MMRd group, 77.8% in p53mut group and 88.2% in NSMP group (p = 0.082). Conclusion: Our study shows the prognostic value of the molecular endometrial cancer classification. Patients with p53mut have a poor progression-free survival, POLEmut endometrial cancer have a good prognosis. In this study, we wanted to demonstrate the importance of molecular markers in endometrium cancer and their contribution to prognosis.

Objective: The present study investigates how human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity affects self-esteem and sexual satisfaction in women. Methods: The research cohort comprised women aged 25 to 50 years attending the Gynecologic Oncology Surgery Outpatient Clinic at Afyonkarahisar State Hospital. Demographic variables such as age, smoking habits, and HPV type were collected. Each participant completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). Results: A significant positive correlation emerged between self-esteem and sexual satisfaction (r = 0.714; 95% CI: 0.643–0.773; p < 0.001), suggesting that elevated self-esteem corresponds with higher sexual satisfaction. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed no statistically significant association between HPV genotype and low self-esteem (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.40–2.28; p > 0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that women with HPV type 16/18 positivity may experience lower self-esteem than those with other HPV genotypes. However, as the study had limited statistical power (≈41%), these genotype-specific findings should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution.