Marcio covas moschovas

Dr. Marcio covas moschovas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlberto Martini
Alberto Martini
UFUgo Falagario
Ugo Falagario
AVArnauld Villers
Arnauld Villers
Paolo Dell'OglioPaolo Dell'Oglio
Paolo Dell'Oglio
EMElio Mazzone
Elio Mazzone
AHAshok K. Hemal
Ashok K. Hemal

1 December 2020 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarcio covas moschovas
Marcio covas moschovas
SBSeetharam Bhat
Seetharam Bhat
FOFikret Fatih Onol
Fikret Fatih Onol
TRTravis Rogers
Travis Rogers
SRShannon Roof
Shannon Roof
VPVipul Patel
Vipul Patel

1 March 2021 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarcio covas moschovas
Marcio covas moschovas
SBSeetharam Bhat
Seetharam Bhat
MSMarco Sandri
Marco Sandri
TRTravis Rogers
Travis Rogers
FOFikret Onol
Fikret Onol
VPVipul Patel
Vipul Patel

1 September 2020 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarcio covas moschovas
Marcio covas moschovas
SBSeetharam Bhat
Seetharam Bhat
TRTravis Rogers
Travis Rogers
FOFikret Onol
Fikret Onol
SRShannon Roof
Shannon Roof
VPVipul Patel
Vipul Patel

18 May 2024 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VPVipul Patel
Vipul Patel
JMJacques Marescaux
Jacques Marescaux
MMMarcio covas moschovas
Marcio covas moschovas

22 October 2024 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSumeet Kumar (PhD Reddy
Sumeet Kumar (PhD Reddy
SSShady Saikali
Shady Saikali
Ahmed GamalAhmed Gamal
Ahmed Gamal
MMMarcio covas moschovas
Marcio covas moschovas
TRTravis Rogers
Travis Rogers
VPVipul (Md Patel
Vipul (Md Patel
Objective: To undertake a systematic review of the medical literature on telesurgery, with a key focus on identifying the key technical and nontechnical themes searched in medical articles and to analyze gaps in the current knowledge base on telesurgery. Background: It has now been over 2 decades since the first successful case of telesurgery and since this time, there have been significant technological and telecommunications advancements. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was completed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Details of the protocol for this systematic review were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024511530). Results: In total, 102 unique references were allocated into 5 categories: technical, cybersecurity, ethical, financial, and regulatory considerations to discuss key themes. The vast majority of references were related to technical considerations, which have demonstrated the feasibility of telesurgery. The nontechnical considerations have a paucity of literature and a lack of guidance on telesurgery which appears to still be the major barriers to telesurgery. Conclusions: Telesurgery presents many interdisciplinary challenges, encompassing both important technical and nontechnical (such as cybersecurity, ethical, financial, and regulatory) considerations. Further research, collaboration between stakeholders, a collaborative community of experts, and the development of comprehensive consensus frameworks are essential steps toward the widespread adoption of telesurgery.