Introduction: The changes and the prognostic implications of left atrial (LA) volumes (LAV), LA function, and vascular load in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) are less known. Methods: We enrolled 150 symptomatic patients (mean age 82 ± 8 years, 58% female, and pre-TAVI aortic valve area 0.40 ± 0.19 cm/m²) with severe AS who underwent 2D transthoracic echocardiography and 2D speckle tracking echocardiography at average 21 ± 35 days before and 171 ± 217 days after TAVI. The end point was a composite of new onset of atrial fibrillation, hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause death (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]). Results: After TAVI, indexed maximal LA volume and minimum volume of the LA decreased by 2.1 ± 10 mL/m² and 1.6 ± 7 mL/m² (p = 0.032 and p = 0.011, respectively), LA function index increased by 6.8 ± 11 units (p < 0.001), and LA stiffness decreased by 0.38 ± 2.0 (p = 0.05). No other changes in the LA phasic volumes, emptying fractions, and vascular load were noted. Post-TAVI, both left atrial and ventricular global peak longitudinal strain improved by about 6% (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). MACE was reached by 37 (25%) patients after a median follow-up period of 172 days (interquartile range, 20–727). In multivariable models, MACE was associated with both pre- and post-TAVI LA global peak longitudinal strain (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, CI 0.59–0.97; and HR 0.77, CI 0.60–1.00, per 5 percentage point units, respectively), pre-TAVI LV global endocardial longitudinal strain (HR 1.37, CI 1.02–1.83 per 5 percentage point units), and with most of the LA phasic volumes. Conclusion: Within 6 months after TAVI, there is reverse LA remodeling and an improvement in LA reservoir function. Pre- and post-TAVI indices of LA function and volume remain independently associated with MACE. Larger studies enrolling a greater diversity of patients may provide sufficient evidence for the utilization of these imaging biomarkers in clinical practice.

We examined the chest CT scans of 1,453 WTC responders using the International Classification of High-resolution CT for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Diseases. Univariate and bivariate analyses of potential work-related pleural abnormalities were performed with pre-WTC and WTC-related occupational exposure data, spirometry, demographics and quantitative CT measurements. Logistic regression was used to evaluate occupational predictors of those abnormalities. Chest CT scans were performed first at a median of 6.8 years after 9/11/2001. Pleural abnormalities were the most frequent (21.1%) across all occupational groups In multivariable analyses, significant pre-WTC occupational asbestos exposure, and work as laborer/cleaner were predictive of pleural abnormalities, with prevalence being highest for the Polish subgroup (n = 237) of our population. Continued occupational lung disease surveillance is warranted in this cohort.

Purpose: Highly accelerated compressed sensing cine has allowed for quantification of ventricular function in a single breath hold. However, compared to segmented breath hold techniques, there may be underestimation or overestimation of LV volumes. Furthermore, a heterogeneous sample of techniques have been used in volunteers and patients for pre-clinical and clinical use. This can complicate individual comparisons where small, but statistically significant differences exist in left ventricular morphological and/or functional parameters. This meta-analysis aims to provide a comparison of conventional cine versus compressed sensing based reconstruction techniques in patients and volunteers. Methods: Two investigators performed systematic searches for eligible studies using PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science to identify studies published 1/1/2010-3/1/2021. Ultimately, 15 studies were included for comparison between compressed sensing cine and conventional imaging. Results: Compared to conventional cine, there were small, statistically significant overestimation of LV mass, underestimation of stroke volume and LV end diastolic volume (mean difference 2.65 g [CL 0.57–4.73], 2.52 mL [CL 0.73–4.31], and 2.39 mL [CL 0.07–4.70], respectively). Attenuated differences persisted across studies using prospective gating (underestimated stroke volume) and non-prospective gating (underestimation of stroke volume, overestimation of mass). There were no significant differences in LV volumes or LV mass with high or low acceleration subgroups in reference to conventional cine except slight underestimation of ejection fraction among high acceleration studies. Reduction in breath hold acquisition time ranged from 33 to 64%, while reduction in total scan duration ranged from 43 to 97%. Conclusion: LV volume and mass assessment using compressed sensing CMR is accurate compared to conventional parallel imaging cine.