Purpose: The dynamism of competition in international markets requires managers to react accordingly and ensure the firm's survival and competitiveness. This study examines the impact of cognitive styles and dynamic managerial capabilities (DMC) on a firm's international performance and the mediating role of these capabilities in the relationship between cognitive styles and international performance.Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts a quantitative cross-sectional research design, employing a sample of 306 firm owner-managers from exporting companies in Kosovo.Findings: The findings suggest that managers' cognitive styles positively influence firm international performance, including their impact on DMC. Results also indicate that only managerial cognition mediates cognitive styles' effects on a firm's international performance, compared to managers' social capital.Originality/value: In this study, the authors contribute to the literature by integrating cognitive styles with DMC in a transition country. Moreover, the authors demonstrate that DMC mediate the impact of cognitive styles on the firm international performance.

In recent years, entrepreneurship in healthcare has emerged as a significant area of scholarly interest. However, limited research has examined how demographic characteristics and specific well-being factors such as life satisfaction, work–life balan...

Background/Objectives: Comparative analysis of work ability factors between German nurses without a migration background and Kosovar nurses working in Germany as nurses with a migration background. Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study. We surveyed 814 nurses from hospitals in Kosovo and Germany using self-administered questionnaires. We used the Nurses Working Capability (WiN) Screening Manual to analyze work ability factors. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, ANCOVA, and Bonferroni multiple comparison tests. Results: Of the 40 target factors, 17 showed significant differences. There were notable distinctions between German and Kosovar nurses in Germany. Concerning health and personal resources, Kosovar nurses in Germany reported poorer physical (M = 3.71) and social health (M = 3.83) but better mental health (M = 3.53) and fewer cognitive stress symptoms (M = 3.60) than German nurses (M = 3.97, M = 4.05, M = 3.40, and M = 4.00, respectively). As to the work-related factors, Kosovar nurses in Germany faced higher emotional demands (M = 3.33), felt greater time pressure (M = 3.43), and had a more negative view of the organizational structure (M = 2.09) but rated supervisor feedback more positively (M = 3.24) and faced fewer patient-related stressors (M = 2.16) relative to German nurses (M = 2.64, M = 2.64, M = 2.82, M = 2.76, and M = 3.09, respectively). Conclusions: Kosovar immigrant nurses in Germany face distinct challenges related to physical and social health, higher emotional demands, and time constraints; they also have a more negative view of organizational structure than native German nurses. The possible causes of these differences may be attributed to migration-related stress, cultural and environmental adaptations, varying job expectations, or organizational experiences.