The World Heart Federation (WHF) commenced a Roadmap initiative in 2015 to reduce the global burden of cardiovascular disease and resultant burgeoning of healthcare costs. Roadmaps provide a blueprint for implementation of priority solutions for the principal cardiovascular diseases leading to death and disability. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of these conditions and is an increasing problem due to ageing of the world’s population and an increase in cardiovascular risk factors that predispose to AF. The goal of the AF roadmap was to provide guidance on priority interventions that are feasible in multiple countries, and to identify roadblocks and potential strategies to overcome them.Since publication of the AF Roadmap in 2017, there have been many technological advances including devices and artificial intelligence for identification and prediction of unknown AF, better methods to achieve rhythm control, and widespread uptake of smartphones and apps that could facilitate new approaches to healthcare delivery and increasing community AF awareness. In addition, the World Health Organisation added the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to the Essential Medicines List, making it possible to increase advocacy for their widespread adoption as therapy to prevent stroke. These advances motivated the WHF to commission a 2020 AF Roadmap update. Three years after the original Roadmap publication, the identified barriers and solutions were judged still relevant, and progress has been slow.This 2020 Roadmap update reviews the significant changes since 2017 and identifies priority areas for achieving the goals of reducing death and disability related to AF, particularly targeted at low-middle income countries. These include advocacy to increase appreciation of the scope of the problem; plugging gaps in guideline management and prevention through physician education, increasing patient health literacy, and novel ways to increase access to integrated healthcare including mHealth and digital transformations; and greater emphasis on achieving practical solutions to national and regional entrenched barriers. Despite the advances reviewed in this update, the task will not be easy, but the health rewards of implementing solutions that are both innovative and practical will be great.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with an increased risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events. However, it is uncertain whether frailty modifies the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control. METHODS: Data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) were used to construct a frailty index. Subgroup differences in intensive blood pressure control treatment effects and safety outcomes were measured on a relative and an absolute scale in patients with and without frailty (defined as a frailty index >0.21) using Cox proportional hazard models and generalized linear models, respectively. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome without myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: A total of 9306 patients (mean age, 67.9±9.4 years), 2560 (26.7%) of whom had frailty, were included in our study. Over a median follow-up of 3.22 years, 561 primary outcomes were observed. Patients with frailty had a significantly higher risk of primary outcome in both the intensive and standard blood pressure control arms (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.59–2.77] and 1.85 [95% CI, 1.46–2.35], respectively). Intensive treatment effects on primary and secondary outcomes were not significantly different on a relative scale (except for cardiovascular death [hazard ratio in patients with and without frailty, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.52–1.60) versus 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16–0.59), respectively; P _interaction =0.01]) or absolute scale. There was no significant interaction between frailty and risks for serious adverse events with intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty status was a marker of high cardiovascular risk. Patients with frailty benefit similarly to other patients from intensive blood pressure control without an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Background: The association between sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation among patients with diabetes and AF remains unclear. Methods and Results: Patients with AF undergoing initial catheter ablation with a history of diabetes from the China AF registry were included. Patients using SGLT2i were identified and matched by propensity score with non‐SGLT2i patients in a 1:3 ratio. The main outcome was AF recurrence during the 18‐month follow‐up. A total of 138 patients with diabetes with SGLT2i therapy and 387 without SGLT2i were analyzed. AF recurrence occurred in 37 patients (26.8%) in the SGLT2i group and 152 patients (39.3%) in the non‐SGLT2i group during a total of 593.3 person‐years follow‐up. The SGLT2i group was associated with lower AF recurrence compared with the non‐SGLT2i group (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.44–0.90], P =0.007). A total of 4 studies were analyzed in our meta‐analysis demonstrating that SGLT2i was associated with lower AF recurrence after catheter ablation (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.54–0.69]; P <0.001, I ² =0.0%). Conclusions: Our prospective study coupled with a meta‐analysis demonstrated a lower risk of AF recurrence with the use of SGLT2i among patients with diabetes after AF ablation.

Background and Purpose: The role of aspirin in unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) growth remains largely unknown. We aim to identify whether aspirin is associated with a lower rate of UIA growth in patients with UIA <7 mm. Methods: This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients with UIAs <7 mm with ischemic cerebrovascular disease between January 2016 and December 2019. Baseline and follow-up patient information, including the use of aspirin and blood pressure level, were recorded. Patients were considered aspirin users if they took aspirin, including standard- and low-dose aspirin, ≥3× per week. The primary end point was aneurysm growth in any direction or an indisputable change in aneurysm shape. Results: Among the 315 enrolled patients, 272 patients (86.3%) underwent imaging examinations during follow-up (mean follow-up time, 19.6±12.7 months). A total of 113 patients were continuously treated with aspirin. UIA growth occurred in 31 (11.4%) patients. In the multivariate Cox analysis, specific aneurysm locations (anterior communicating artery, posterior communicating artery, or middle cerebral artery; hazard ratio, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.22–6.88]; P =0.016) and a UIA size of 5 to <7 mm (hazard ratio, 7.61 [95% CI, 3.02–19.22]; P 1 risk factor) with and without aspirin, respectively. Conclusions: Aspirin therapy and well-controlled blood pressure are associated with a low risk of UIA growth; the incidence of UIA growth in high-risk patients in the first year is high, warranting intensive surveillance in this patient group. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02846259.