Marta Garrigues‐Ramón

Dr. Marta Garrigues‐Ramón

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2024 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCristina Gómez-Moreno
Cristina Gómez-Moreno
EVEsperanza Vélez‐Vélez
Esperanza Vélez‐Vélez
MGMarta Garrigues‐Ramón
Marta Garrigues‐Ramón
MAMarta Rojas Alfaro
Marta Rojas Alfaro
EBEva García-Carpintero blas
Eva García-Carpintero blas

30 May 2025 in Nursing Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBelén González Tejerina
Belén González Tejerina
Jorge Pérez-CorralesJorge Pérez-Corrales
Jorge Pérez-Corrales
DPDomingo Palacios-Ceña
Domingo Palacios-Ceña
JAJose Abad-Valle
Jose Abad-Valle
PRPaloma Rodríguez
Paloma Rodríguez
MGMarta Garrigues‐Ramón
Marta Garrigues‐Ramón
Background/Objectives: Clinical debriefing is a learning tool that promotes reflection after critical incidents, improving patient safety and professional performance. TALK© is a debriefing technique designed to facilitate structured team self-reflection after any learning event in clinical settings. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of fourth-year nursing students in clinical internships with clinical debriefing guided by the TALK© tool. Methods: A qualitative case study was conducted. Twenty-seven participants were recruited using purposeful sampling. The sample consisted of nursing students. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus groups, personal writings, and researcher field notes. An inductive thematic analysis process was applied. The data analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti 23 software, which facilitated the identification and organization of key themes and patterns within the qualitative data. Conclusions: Participants perceived TALK©-guided clinical debriefing as a valuable practice. Key factors influencing their experience included the reflexive process, the debriefing approach and technique, the timing and context, as well as its emotional sphere.

27 June 2024 in International Wound Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMarta Garrigues‐Ramón
Marta Garrigues‐Ramón
AAAlba Arca‐Arias
Alba Arca‐Arias
LRLucía A. Carrasco Ribelles
Lucía A. Carrasco Ribelles
CBCarlos Barrios
Carlos Barrios
The uncertainty concerning the physiological effects of compression bandaging on the peripheral blood flow is a challenge for healthcare professionals. The main objective was to determine the haemodynamic impact on the distal posterior tibial artery after the application of a high‐compression leg multicomponent bandaging system using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Leg dominance disparities of the posterior tibial artery before and after the application of the compressive bandage were also analysed. Twenty‐eight healthy female volunteers were recruited (mean: 25.71, standard deviation: 4.74 years old) through a non‐probability convenience sampling. The 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging of the distal tibial posterior artery was performed in all participants, first under standard resting conditions and after the application of a compression bandage in the leg. When the strong compressive bandage was applied, the area of the assessed artery decreased by 14.2%, whilst the average speed increased by 19.6% and the flow rate increased by 184.8%. There were differences between the haemodynamic parameters of both legs according to dominance, being statistically significantly lower in the dominant leg. The application of strong compressive bandaging significantly increases the arterial flow and mean velocity in the distal segment of the posterior tibial artery, in healthy volunteers by 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. In this study, leg dominance influenced some of the haemodynamic parameters. According to the results, leg compression bandages cannot be contraindicated in vascular ulcers with arterial compromise.

22 December 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMaría Fernanda Callirgos
María Fernanda Callirgos
Marina Gómez de Quero CórdobaMarina Gómez de Quero Córdoba
Marina Gómez de Quero Córdoba
MGMarta Garrigues‐Ramón
Marta Garrigues‐Ramón
Sagrario Gomez-CantarinoSagrario Gomez-Cantarino
Sagrario Gomez-Cantarino
ARAdolfo Romero-Arana
Adolfo Romero-Arana
EBElena Arroyo Bello
Elena Arroyo Bello
Background: Vulvodynia is a chronic vulvar pain syndrome with multifactorial etiology and unclear pathophysiology. Despite its high prevalence, it remains underdiagnosed and under-researched, with significant repercussions for women’s physical, psychological, and social well-being. Objective: To synthesize the available scientific evidence on quality of life (QoL) in women diagnosed with vulvodynia, identifying the main affected domains and the assessment tools used in the literature. Methods: A rapid review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane Rapid Reviews guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Biblioteca Virtual en Salud, and CUIDEN without date or geographic restrictions. Studies including adult women diagnosed with vulvodynia and reporting QoL outcomes were eligible. Data was extracted and synthesized narratively, and methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Twenty studies published between 2006 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria (13 quantitative and 7 qualitative). Vulvodynia was consistently associated with reduced QoL across physical, psychological, and social dimensions. The most frequently reported issues were chronic vulvar pain, sexual dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal. Tools such as SF-12, SF-36, WHOQOL-BREF, DLQI, Skindex-29, and SQLQ-F were commonly used, although heterogeneity among instruments limited comparability. Multidisciplinary interventions combining physiotherapy and psychological therapy showed improvements in emotional and physical well-being, though sexual dysfunction often persisted. Conclusions: Vulvodynia substantially impairs women’s quality of life, reflecting complex biopsychosocial interactions. The findings highlight the need for standardized QoL measures and gender-sensitive, multidisciplinary approaches to diagnosis, management, and research.