Background: TikTok has emerged as a major source of health information, including content related to intrauterine devices (IUDs). However, the accuracy, quality, and engagement patterns of IUD-related content on this platform remain insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the informational quality, thematic focus, misinformation prevalence, and engagement metrics of widely viewed IUD-related TikTok videos. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional content analysis was conducted of TikTok videos retrieved using 12 IUD-related search terms. Engagement metrics, creator characteristics, and content features were extracted, including educational, testimonial, and advice-seeking videos. Advice-seeking videos were included to capture user-generated concerns and inquiries that may influence engagement with health-related content on social media platforms. Informational reliability and quality were assessed using the Modified DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Differences across groups were examined using t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-square tests. Results: A total of 458 videos were included. Nearly half were testimonial or advice-seeking (47.8%), while 38.9% were educational. Most content was produced by non-healthcare creators (76.4%). Engagement metrics did not differ significantly across video type, source, or creator qualification (all p > 0.05). Frequently discussed topics included adverse effects (36.5%), insertion experiences (31.2%), and device removal or discontinuation (19.9%). Overall informational quality was low, with mean GQS and Modified DISCERN scores of 2.0 and 1.8, respectively. Physician-created content demonstrated significantly higher quality and reliability scores (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Widely viewed IUD-related TikTok content demonstrates high engagement but generally low informational quality.

Objective: Although Las Vegas is a major tourist hub, it is not among the counties that are under CDC surveillance for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), a major nosocomial infection. To determine the distribution of C. difficile ribotypes in the Las Vegas area, we collected stool samples from CDI-positive patients at the University Medical Center (UMC). Methods: We included adult patients diagnosed with CDI and provided informed consent. C. difficile was isolated from the stool samples and ribotyped. Demographic information was also obtained and analyzed. All information was compared to the surveillance data from the CDC. Results: We identified more frequently in male patients than in the CDC data. Less than half of the patients used antibiotics prior to the infection. We observed several comorbidities in our patient sample pool, with cardiovascular disease and diabetes being the most prevalent comorbidities. Hypervirulent C. difficile strain 027 was the most prevalent ribotype. Except for two samples of ribotype 076, all other samples represented unique singlet ribotypes. Four of these ribotypes (160, 302, 363, and 813) have not been explicitly reported in humans. Conclusions: Due to the unique environment created by the tourism industry in Las Vegas, this population is exposed to national and international visitors. This study shows the pre-COVID landscape of C. difficile ribotypes in Las Vegas and offers valuable insights into the varieties of C. difficile that are currently infecting this community.