Zhenjie  Xu Xu

Dr. Zhenjie  Xu Xu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 March 2025 in Coatings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZXZhenjie  Xu Xu
Zhenjie  Xu Xu
Fengjiang QinFengjiang Qin
Fengjiang Qin
Q.W. YangQ.W. Yang
Q.W. Yang
Xi PengXi Peng
Xi Peng
BXBin Xu
Bin Xu
The interfacial shear performance between ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and normal concrete (NC) is a critical factor in determining the overall performance of composite structures. This paper systematically reviews the research progress on the interfacial shear performance of UHPC-NC, revealing the core mechanisms of bond strength (dominated by mechanical interlocking with chemical bonding as a supplementary factor). It compares the advantages and disadvantages of single-shear, Z-shaped shear, double-shear, and inclined shear tests, clarifying the influence patterns of key parameters such as interface roughness, matrix wetness, curing conditions, and fiber content. This study found that interface treatment is the most significant factor in improving shear strength. Roughening or grooving treatments can increase the strength by more than 40%~80%, while the combination of rebar planting and grooving can further enhance ductility. The matrix wetness (saturated and moist) and UHPC age (within 7 days) need to be strictly controlled to avoid differences in shrinkage stress. Prediction models based on mechanics, finite element analysis, and experimental data each have their advantages and disadvantages and should be selected based on actual working conditions. To address common issues in practical engineering, such as insufficient interface roughness, shrinkage cracking, and fatigue degradation under cyclic loading, it is recommended to adopt composite interface treatment techniques (such as roughening + rebar planting), prestressing design, and optimized fiber distribution (with a steel fiber content of 1.5%~2.5%). This paper provides the theoretical basis and practical guidance for the design optimization and construction control of UHPC reinforcement projects and composite structures.

22 October 2024 in Coatings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHongfei Cao
Hongfei Cao
ZXZhenjie  Xu Xu
Zhenjie  Xu Xu
Xi PengXi Peng
Xi Peng
Concrete carbonation can weaken its strength, cause the corrosion of steel reinforcement, and shorten its service life. Predicting the concrete carbonation depth is a critical aspect of assessing concrete durability. Currently, mathematical models for the concrete carbonation depth, exemplified by the Fick model, suffer from a low fitting accuracy and limited applicability due to the complexity and variability of concrete materials and service environments. In light of this, this work proposes an improved Fick model that incorporates a correction term to effectively enhance the curve fitting accuracy. The correction term in the improved model provides a reasonable adjustment for deviations in the development pattern of the concrete carbonation depth from the Fick model under different conditions, thereby broadening the applicability of the new model compared to the Fick model. Several sets of experimental data on the concrete carbonation depth are used to validate the universality and superiority of the new model. The results of the case studies indicate that the average prediction error and standard deviation of the new model are significantly smaller than those of the Fick model. For the first two examples, in most situations, the average prediction error and standard deviation of the new model are less than 50% of those of the Fick model, with the lowest average prediction error being only 4% and the lowest standard deviation being only 2% of the Fick model’s respective values. For the third example, the new model demonstrates superior predictive capability for the later-stage concrete carbonation depth compared to the Fick model and the ANN model. Specifically, for the carbonation depth of the concrete on the 56th day, the relative error between the predicted value of the new model and the measured value is only 2%, which is much smaller than the 27% of the Fick model and the 12% of the ANN model. These results demonstrate the unique advantage of the proposed model in predicting the carbonation depth, especially when only a limited amount of experimental data are available.