Background: For the past few years, scientific controversy has surrounded the large number of errors in forensic and literature mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data. However, recent research has shown that using mtDNA phylogeny and referring to known mtDNA haplotypes can be useful for checking the quality of sequence data. Results: We developed a Web-based bioinformatics resource "mtDNAmanager" that offers a convenient interface supporting the management and quality analysis of mtDNA sequence data. The mtDNAmanager performs computations on mtDNA control-region sequences to estimate the most-probable mtDNA haplogroups and retrieves similar sequences from a selected database. By the phased designation of the most-probable haplogroups (both expected and estimated haplogroups), mtDNAmanager enables users to systematically detect errors whilst allowing for confirmation of the presence of clear key diagnostic mutations and accompanying mutations. The query tools of mtDNAmanager also facilitate database screening with two options of "match" and "include the queried nucleotide polymorphism". In addition, mtDNAmanager provides Web interfaces for users to manage and analyse their own data in batch mode. Conclusion: The mtDNAmanager will provide systematic routines for mtDNA sequence data management and analysis via easily accessible Web interfaces, and thus should be very useful for population, medical and forensic studies that employ mtDNA analysis. mtDNAmanager can be accessed at http://mtmanager.yonsei.ac.kr.

This study proposes a hybrid approach combining threshold-based algorithm and deep learning to detect four major gait events—initial contact (IC), toe-off (TO), opposite initial contact (OIC), and opposite toe-off (OTO)—using only a smartphone’s built-in inertial sensor placed in the user’s pocket. The algorithm enables estimation of spatiotemporal gait parameters such as cadence, stride length, loading response (LR), pre-swing (PSw), single limb support (SLS), double limb support (DLS), and swing phase and symmetry. Gait data were collected from 20 healthy individuals and 13 hemiparetic stroke patients. To reduce sensitivity to sensor orientation and suppress noise, sum vector magnitude (SVM) features were extracted and filtered using a second-order Butterworth low-pass filter at 3 Hz. A deep learning model was further compressed using knowledge distillation, reducing model size by 96% while preserving accuracy. The proposed method achieved error rates in event detection below 2% of the gait cycle for healthy gait and a maximum of 4.4% for patient gait in event detection, with corresponding parameter estimation errors also within 4%. These results demonstrated the feasibility of accurate and real-time gait monitoring using a smartphone. In addition, statistical analysis of gait parameters such as symmetry and DLS revealed significant differences between the normal and patient groups. While this study is not intended to provide or guide rehabilitation treatment, it offers a practical means to regularly monitor patients’ gait status and observe gait recovery trends over time.

In this study, the effect of threshold applied to the radar rain rate on the comparison of the radar and rain gauge rain rate was theoretically examined. The result derived was also evaluated theoretically, using the Bernoulli random field, and empirically, using Gwanaksan Radar data. The results are summarized as follows. (1) In the application to the Bernoulli random field, it was found that the comparison of the radar and rain gauge rain rate with threshold does not introduce any systematic bias. (2) The same results could also be derived in the application to Gwanaksan Radar data. In all cases with several radar bin sizes and thresholds considered, the bias was estimated to be far less than 10% of the mean of the rain gauge rain rate. (3) However, in the comparison with threshold applied to both the radar and rain gauge rain rate, the bias was estimated to be higher than 20%. That is, the systematic bias was introduced. This result indicates that the comparison with threshold applied to both the radar and rain gauge rain rate should not be used.