Jingxian Zhu

Dr. Jingxian Zhu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 June 2015 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LDLinghui Dai
Linghui Dai
XHXiaoqing Hu
Xiaoqing Hu
XZXin Zhang
Xin Zhang
JZJingxian Zhu
Jingxian Zhu
JZJiying Zhang
Jiying Zhang
CZChunyan Zhou
Chunyan Zhou
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are regarded as a promising cell-based therapeutic tool for tendon repair. This study aimed to compare the different tenogenic differentiation capacities of the three types of MSCs in the presence of bone morphogenic protein 12 (BMP-12). MSCs were isolated from rat bone marrow (BM), inguinal adipose tissue (AD), and synovium (SM) from the knee joint. MSCs were characterized by morphology, proliferation, trilineage differentiation, and surface marker analysis. Tenogenic differentiation potential was initially assessed using real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in vitro. Histological assessments were also performed after subcutaneous implantation of BMP-12 recombinant adenovirus-infected MSCs in nude mice in vivo. The three types of MSCs exhibited similar fibroblast-like morphology and surface markers but different differentiation potentials toward adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic lineage fates. Bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) showed the most superior in vitro tenogenic differentiation capacity, followed by synovial membrane-derived MSCs (SM-MSCs) and then adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs). After implantation, all three types of MSC masses infected with BMP-12 recombinant adenovirus emerged in the form of fiber-like matrix, especially in 6-week specimens, compared with the control MSCs in vivo. BM-MSCs and SM-MSCs revealed more intense staining for collagen type I (Col I) compared with AD-MSCs. Differences were not observed between BM-MSCs and SM-MSCs. However, SM-MSCs demonstrated higher proliferation capacity than BM-MSCs. BM-MSCs exhibited the most superior tenogenic differentiation capacity, followed by SM-MSCs. By contrast, AD-MSCs demonstrated the inferior capacity among the three types of MSCs in the presence of BMP-12 both in vivo and in vitro.

1 December 2011
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYu-Lei Liu
Yu-Lei Liu
YAYingfang Ao
Yingfang Ao
GCGuo-Qing Cui
Guo-Qing Cui
JZJingxian Zhu
Jingxian Zhu

26 August 2025 in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTianxin Shi
Tianxin Shi
QSQingzhao Shi
Qingzhao Shi
SRShuang Ren
Shuang Ren
XHXiaorui Huang
Xiaorui Huang
JRJun Ren
Jun Ren
JZJingxian Zhu
Jingxian Zhu
This study compared the body composition and strength of the lower extremity parameters between novice runners (NRs) and amateur marathon runners (AMRs). A total of 50 NRs (33.84 ± 4.32 years) and 50 AMRs (33.36 ± 5.55 years) were analyzed cross-sectionally. Bioelectrical impedance analysis measured body composition parameters, and isokinetic testing assessed knee muscle strength. The results showed that compared to AMRs, NRs had lower fat-free mass (FFM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), and total body water (TBW) (−15, −12, and −5%; all p < 0.01) but higher body fat percentage (PBF) and visceral fat area (VFA) (+27 and +32%; both p < 0.01). They also had 6% lower knee extensor (KE) strength and 31% lower knee flexor (KF) strength on the dominant legs (DLs) and 14% lower KF strength on the non-dominant legs (NDLs). In addition, their hamstring–quadriceps ratio (H: Q) was 24% lower on the DLs and 9% lower on the NDLs. The NRs exhibited significant negative correlations between PBF, VFA, and knee muscle strength (r = −0.54 to −0.42, p < 0.01), while the AMRs had significant negative correlations only for PBF (r = −0.59 to −0.57, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the NRs exhibited lower FFM and TBW, higher PBF and VFA, and reduced muscle strength. In contrast, the AMRs exhibited the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that NRs with elevated body fat (BF) indicators should prioritize fat reduction and performance enhancement, while those with lower muscle mass require targeted programs to increase muscle capacity and joint stability. This approach may advance them toward the level of AMRs. Future studies should adopt longitudinal designs to explore how training interventions influence the physiological adaptations observed in runners at different experience levels.