Supplementation of clinical nutrition with omega-3 fatty acid in fish oil exerts immune-modulating and organ-protective effects, even after short-term application. The aim of this study was to evaluate dose-dependent effects of parenteral supplementation of a 10% fish oil emulsion (Omegaven, Fresenius-Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) on diagnosis- and organ failure–related outcome. Prospective, open label, multiple-center trial. A total of 661 patients from 82 German hospitals receiving total parenteral nutrition for ≥3 days were enrolled in this study. The sample included 255 patients after major abdominal surgery, 276 with peritonitis and abdominal sepsis, 16 with nonabdominal sepsis, 59 after multiple trauma, 18 with severe head injury, and 37 with other diagnoses. The primary study end point was survival; secondary end points were length of hospital stay and use of antibiotics with respect to the primary diagnosis and the extent of organ failure. Multiple quasi-linear and logistic regression models were used for calculating diagnosis-related fish oil doses associated with best outcome. The patients enrolled in this survey were (mean ± sd) 62.8 ± 16.5 yrs old, with a body mass index of 25.1 ± 4.2 and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II score of 32.2 ± 13.6. Length of hospital stay was 29.1 ± 18.7 days (12.5 ± 14.8 days in the intensive care unit). Total parenteral nutrition, including fish oil (mean, 0.11 g·kg−1·day−1), was administered for 8.7 ± 7.5 days and lowered hospital mortality as predicted by Simplified Acute Physiology Score II from 18.9% (95% confidence interval, 17.4–20.4%) to 12.0% (p < .001). The fish oil dose·kg−1·day−1 did correlate with beneficial outcome (intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, mortality). Fish oil had the most favorable effects on survival, infection rates, and length of stay when administered in doses between 0.1 and 0.2 g·kg−1·day−1. Lower antibiotic demand by 26% was observed when doses of 0.15–0.2 g·kg−1·day−1 were infused as compared with doses of <0.05 g·kg−1·day−1. After peritonitis and abdominal sepsis, multiple quasi-linear regression models revealed a fish oil dose for minimizing intensive care unit stay of 0.23 g·kg−1·day−1 and an inverse linear relationship between dosage and intensive care unit stay in major abdominal surgery. Administration of omega-3 fatty acid may reduce mortality, antibiotic use, and length of hospital stay in different diseases. Effects and effect sizes related to fish oil doses are diagnosis dependent. In view of the lack of substantial study literature concerning diagnosis-related nutritional single-substrate intervention in the critically ill, the present data can be used in formulating hypotheses and may serve as reference doses for randomized, controlled studies, which may, for instance, confirm the value of omega-3 fatty acid in the adjunctive therapy of peritonitis and abdominal sepsis.

A severe mismatch between the supply and demand of oxygen is the common feature of all types of shock. We present a newly developed, clinically oriented classification of the various types of shock and their therapeutic implications. This review is based on pertinent publications (1990-2018) retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on the relevant guidelines and meta-analyses. There are only four major categories of shock, each of which is mainly related to one of four organ systems. Hypovolemic shock relates to the blood and fluids compartment while distributive shock relates to the vascular system; cardiogenic shock arises from primary cardiac dysfunction; and obstructive shock arises from a blockage of the circulation. Hypovolemic shock is due to intravascular volume loss and is treated by fluid replacement with balanced crystalloids. Distributive shock, on the other hand, is a state of relative hypovolemia resulting from pathological redistribution of the absolute intravascular volume and is treated with a combination of vasoconstrictors and fluid replacement. Cardiogenic shock is due to inadequate function of the heart, which shall be treated, depending on the situation, with drugs, surgery, or other interventional procedures. In obstructive shock, hypoperfusion due to elevated resistance shall be treated with an immediate life-saving intervention. The new classification is intended to facilitate the goal-driven treatment of shock in both the pre-hospital and the inpatient setting. A uniform treatment strategy should be established for each of the four types of shock.

A 91-yr-old man (57 kg, 156 cm, ASA III) received an infraclavicular brachial plexus block for surgery of bursitis of the olecranon. Twenty minutes after infraclavicular injection of 30 mL of mepivacaine 1% (Scandicain) and 5 min after supplementation of 10 mL of prilocaine 1% (Xylonest) using an axillary approach, the patient complained of agitation and dizziness and became unresponsive to verbal commands. In addition, supraventricular extrasystole with bigeminy occurred. Local anesthetic toxicity was suspected and a dose of 200 mL of a 20% lipid emulsion was infused. Symptoms of central nervous system and cardiac toxicity disappeared within 5 and 15 min after the first lipid injection, respectively. Plasma concentrations of local anesthetics were determined before, 20, and 40 min after lipid infusion and were 4.08, 2.30, and 1.73 microg/mL for mepivacaine and 0.92, 0.35, and 0.24 microg/mL for prilocaine. These concentrations are below previously reported thresholds of toxicity above 5 microg/mL for both local anesthetics. Signs of toxicity resolved and the patient underwent the scheduled surgical procedure uneventfully under brachial plexus blockade.

This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched parenteral nutrition (PN) vs standard (non‐ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched) PN in adult hospitalized patients (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018110179). We included 49 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with intervention and control groups given ω‐3 fatty acids and standard lipid emulsions, respectively, as part of PN covering ≥70% energy provision. The relative risk (RR) of infection (primary outcome; 24 RCTs) was 40% lower with ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched PN than standard PN (RR 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49‐0.72; P < 0.00001). Patients given ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched PN had reduced mean length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (10 RCTs; 1.95 days, 95% CI 0.42‐3.49; P = 0.01) and reduced length of hospital stay (26 RCTs; 2.14 days, 95% CI 1.36‐2.93; P < 0.00001). Risk of sepsis (9 RCTs) was reduced by 56% in those given ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched PN (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28‐0.70; P = 0.0004). Mortality rate (co‐primary outcome; 20 RCTs) showed a nonsignificant 16% reduction (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65‐1.07; P = 0.15) for the ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched group. In summary, ω‐3 fatty‐acid enriched PN is beneficial, reducing risk of infection and sepsis by 40% and 56%, respectively, and length of both ICU and hospital stay by about 2 days. Provision of ω‐3‐enriched lipid emulsions should be preferred over standard lipid emulsions in patients with an indication for PN.