Sanjay Patole

Prof. Sanjay Patole

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2007 in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSven M. Schulzke
Sven M. Schulzke
GDGirish C. Deshpande
Girish C. Deshpande
SPSanjay Patole
Sanjay Patole
Review from JAMA Pediatrics — Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants With Necrotizing Enterocolitis — A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

5 July 2018 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGirish Deshpande
Girish Deshpande
Gayatri JapeGayatri Jape
Gayatri Jape
SPSanjay Patole
Sanjay Patole
Current evidence supports the use of probiotics in preterm neonates for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis, mortality and late onset sepsis. Despite the strong evidence, the uptake of this intervention has not been universal due to concerns including probiotic sepsis, pro-inflammatory response and transmission of antibiotic resistance. Critically ill extremely preterm neonates with potentially compromised gut integrity are at higher risk of probiotic sepsis due to translocation. In most countries, probiotics are sold as food supplements with poor quality control. The traditional definition of probiotics as “live microorganisms” has been challenged as many experts have questioned the importance of viability in the context of the beneficial effects of probiotics. Paraprobiotics (ghost probiotics), are defined as non-viable microbial cells (intact or broken) or crude cell extracts (i.e., with complex chemical composition), which, when administered (orally or topically) in adequate amounts, confer a benefit on the human or animal consumer. Current evidence indicates that paraprobiotics could be safe alternatives to probiotics in preterm neonates. High-quality pre-clinical and clinical studies including adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted in preterm neonates to explore this new frontier.

1 May 2005 in Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJ M Brooks
J M Brooks
JTJ N Travadi
J N Travadi
SPSanjay Patole
Sanjay Patole
DDD A Doherty
D A Doherty
Karen SimmerKaren Simmer
Karen Simmer
Background: Surgical ligation of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is widely practised in preterm infants despite no clear evidence that this improves outcomes. Geographical isolation meant that ductal ligation was not an option in King Edward Memorial Hospital until recently. Objective: A retrospective data analysis to test the hypothesis that outcomes of infants with persistent PDA were no worse than those of infants with no significant duct or a duct that closed after medical treatment. Patients and Methods: A total of 252 infants (gestation ⩽28 weeks) born between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2002 were divided into three groups: group 1, no significant PDA (n = 154); group 2, significant PDA which closed after medical treatment (n = 65); group 3, significant PDA remaining patent after medical treatment (n = 33). A significant PDA was defined by a left atrium to aortic root ratio of >1.4 or a ductal diameter >1.5 mm with a left to right shunt. Results: Twenty four (10%) infants died at median (interquartile range) 15.5 (9–35) days. After adjustment for gestational age, relative to group 1, the infants from group 3 were at a 4.02 times increased risk of death (95% confidence interval 1.12 to 14.51). There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of chronic lung disease, chronic lung disease or death, necrotising enterocolitis, intraventricular haemorrhage, duration of oxygen, or hospital stay. Conclusion: Mortality was higher in infants with a persistent PDA, but other morbidities were not significantly different. A randomised trial is needed to determine whether surgical ligation will reduce mortality in such infants.

2 August 2011 in BMC Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGirish Deshpande
Girish Deshpande
SRShripada Rao
Shripada Rao
AKAnthony D Keil
Anthony D Keil
SPSanjay Patole
Sanjay Patole
Background: Current evidence indicates that probiotic supplementation significantly reduces all-cause mortality and definite necrotising enterocolitis without significant adverse effects in preterm neonates. As the debate about the pros and cons of routine probiotic supplementation continues, many institutions are satisfied with the current evidence and wish to use probiotics routinely. Because of the lack of detail on many practical aspects of probiotic supplementation, clinician-friendly guidelines are urgently needed to optimise use of probiotics in preterm neonates. Aim: To develop evidence-based guidelines for probiotic supplementation in preterm neonates. Methods: To develop core guidelines on use of probiotics, including strain selection, dose and duration of supplementation, we primarily used the data from our recent updated systematic review of randomised controlled trials. For equally important issues including strain identification, monitoring for adverse effects, product format, storage and transport, and regulatory hurdles, a comprehensive literature search, covering the period 1966-2010 without restriction on the study design, was conducted, using the databases PubMed and EMBASE, and the proceedings of scientific conferences; these data were used in our updated systematic review. Results: In this review, we present guidelines, including level of evidence, for the practical aspects (for example, strain selection, dose, duration, clinical and laboratory surveillance) of probiotic supplementation, and for dealing with non-clinical but important issues (for example, regulatory requirements, product format). Evidence was inadequate in some areas, and these should be a target for further research. Conclusion: We hope that these evidence-based guidelines will help to optimise the use of probiotics in preterm neonates. Continued research is essential to provide answers to the current gaps in knowledge about probiotics.

3 March 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSanjay Patole
Sanjay Patole
AKAnthony D. Keil
Anthony D. Keil
ACAnnie Chang
Annie Chang
ENElizabeth Nathan
Elizabeth Nathan
DDDorota Doherty
Dorota Doherty
PCPatricia Conway
Patricia Conway
Probiotic supplementation significantly reduces the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and all cause mortality in preterm neonates. Independent quality assessment is important before introducing routine probiotic supplementation in this cohort. To assess product quality, and confirm that Bifidobacterium breve (B. breve) M-16V supplementation will increase fecal B. breve counts without adverse effects. Strain identity (16S rRNA gene sequencing), viability over 2 year shelf-life were confirmed, and microbial contamination of the product was ruled out. In a controlled trial preterm neonates (Gestation <33 weeks) ready to commence or on feeds for <12 hours were randomly allocated to either B. breve M-16V (3×109 cfu/day) or placebo (dextrin) supplementation until the corrected age 37 weeks. Stool samples were collected before (S1) and after 3 weeks of supplementation (S2) for studying fecal B. breve levels using quantitative PCR (Primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included total fecal bifidobacteria and NEC≥Stage II. Categorical and continuous outcomes were analysed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, and McNemar and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for paired comparisons. A total of 159 neonates (Probiotic: 79, Placebo: 80) were enrolled. Maternal and neonatal demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. The proportion of neonates with detectable B. breve increased significantly post intervention: Placebo: [S1:2/66 (3%), S2: 25/66 (38%), p<0.001] Probiotic: [S1: 29/74 (40%), S2: 67/74 (91%), p<0.001]. Median S1 B. breve counts in both groups were below detection (<4.7 log cells.g−1), increasing significantly in S2 for the probiotic group (log 8.6) while remaining <4.7 log in the control group (p<0.001). There were no adverse effects including probiotic sepsis and no deaths. NEC≥Stage II occurred in only 1 neonate (placebo group). B. breve M-16V is a suitable probiotic strain for routine use in preterm neonates. Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN 12609000374268

5 September 2007 in BMC Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSven M Schulzke
Sven M Schulzke
SRShripada Rao
Shripada Rao
SPSanjay Patole
Sanjay Patole
The objective of this study was to systematically review randomized trials assessing therapeutic hypothermia as a treatment for term neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.