Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly are common. Recently, the efficacy of operative treatment of displaced DRFs in patients above 65 years of age has been questioned and it has been suggested that non-operative treatment should be the gold standard. However, the complications and functional outcome of displaced vs. minimally and non-displaced DRFs in the elderly has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the present study was to compare non-operatively treated displaced DRFs vs. minimally and non-displaced DRFs in terms of complications, PROMs, grip strength and range of motion (ROM) after 2 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Methods: We used a prospective cohort study that compared patients with displaced DRFs (n = 50), i.e., >10 degrees of dorsal angulation after two reduction attempts, with patients with minimally or non-displaced DRFs after reduction. Both cohorts received the same treatment of 5 weeks of dorsal plaster casting. Complications and functional outcomes (quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH), patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE), grip strength and EQ-5D scores) were assessed after 5 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-injury. The protocol of the VOLCON RCT and present observational study has been published (PMC6599306; clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716661). Results: One year after 5 weeks of dorsal below-elbow casting of low-energy DRFs in patients ≥ 65 years old, we found a complication rate of 6.3% (3/48) in minimally or non-displaced DRFs and 16.6% (7/42) in displaced DRFs (p = 0.18). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in functional outcomes in terms of QuickDASH, pain, ROM, grip strength or EQ-5D scores. Discussion: In patients above 65 years of age, non-operative treatment, i.e., closed reduction and dorsal casting for 5 weeks, yielded similar complication rates and functional outcomes after 1 year regardless of whether the initial fracture was non-displaced/minimally displaced or still displaced after closed reduction. While the initial closed reduction should still be attempted in order to restore the anatomy, failure to achieve the stipulated radiological criteria may not be as important as we thought in terms of complications and functional outcome.

Distal radius fractures (DRF) in the elderly population above 65 years represent 18% of all fractures and are thereby the second most frequent fracture in the elderly. Fracture dislocation and comminution are often used to determine whether non-operative or operative treatment is indicated. The purpose of this prospective case series of minimally displaced DRF treated with a dorsal cast was to assess the complication rate and patient-reported outcome measures. This single-centre, single-blinded, prospective case series followed 50 conservatively treated DRF patients for one year. Primary outcomes were complications and Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) score. Secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM), grip strength and pain, and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE). Results showed only minor complications with a return to prior ROM, qDASH, and pain after 12 months and improvement in outcomes after 6–12 months. In conclusion, the majority of DRF patients who were treated non-operatively with five-week dorsal casting recover fully after minimally displaced DRF. This standard approach is thus considered safe, and the present results provide a reference for other studies.

Background: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) have high mortality rates. Surgical delay likely contributes. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation is common for FNF, and the tip–apex distance (TAD) measures screw position in the femoral head. A TAD >20–25 mm is considered a risk factor for screw cut-out. This study investigated the association between (1) surgical delay and complication/mortality rates within two years post-surgery and (2) TAD and postoperative complications following DHS in FNF. Methods: This retrospective study included 325 FNF patients who underwent DHS osteosynthesis at Regional Hospital Randers, Denmark from 2015–2021. The primary composite outcome included complications measured on radiographs (e.g., screw cut-out, avascular necrosis), reoperation, or death within 2 years. Radiographs were evaluated for TAD and postoperative complications/reoperations. Surgical delay was defined as the time from the diagnostic radiograph to the start of the operation. TAD was measured based on radiographs. Electronic patient journals and national SSN registers were used to assess reoperation and death rates. Results: The mortality rate was 16% within 1 year and 26% within 2 years. The complication rate was 16% within 2 years. The median surgical delay was 7.9 h (IQR 5; 14). Surgical delay was significantly associated with the 1-year mortality rate (p < 0.01), but not with the 1-year complication rate (p = 0.77). Surgical delay was associated with complication rates 2 years post-surgery only for undisplaced fractures, p = 0.046. The median TAD was 16.3 mm (13.8; 18.7); no association with complications <1 year (p = 0.56) or 20 mm, six of whom had complications, and 6/59 with TAD >25 mm, none of whom had complications. Conclusions: We report a significant association between surgical delay and mortality rates in FNF, despite surgical delays <24 h. Additionally, there was a significant association between surgical delay and risk of complication/reoperation 2 years post-surgery for undisplaced fractures. No association was found between TAD and complication rates following DHS fixation for FNF; however, only a few TAD outliers were observed.

Background/Objectives: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common fractures in the elderly, with increasing incidence due to population aging. Recent evidence questions the benefits of operative treatment, particularly in elderly patients. The present study aimed to assess post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after a minimum of two years of follow-up of the previously published VOLCON randomized controlled trial (RCT), which compared operative and non-operative treatments of unstable DRFs in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Methods: This study presents a minimum two-year follow-up of a single-center, assessor-blinded RCT. A total of 100 patients with unstable DRFs were randomized to either operative treatment with volar locking plating or non-operative treatment with cast immobilization. The primary outcome was post-traumatic OA, assessed using the Knirk and Jupiter classification. Secondary outcomes included PROMs (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH)) and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), complications, pain, grip strength, and range of motion (ROM). Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA. Results: After a median follow-up of 3.0 years, 60 patients (28 non-operative and 32 operative) were available for analysis. There was no significant difference in OA between the groups (p = 0.57). PROMs (Quick-DASH, PRWHE), pain, grip strength, and ROM were time-dependent (p < 0.001) but not treatment-dependent. Complications were more frequent in the operative group, including hardware-related issues requiring reoperation. Conclusions: At a minimum of two years of follow-up, no correlation was found between treatment choice and post-traumatic OA. Functional outcomes were similar between groups, suggesting that non-operative treatment remains a viable option for elderly patients with unstable DRFs.