Midkine (MDK) is a multifunctional protein that is secreted into the extracellular space. It functions as a cytokine or growth factor, modulating a variety of signaling pathways implicated in angiogenesis, antitumor immunity, metastasis, and therapy resistance. MDK overexpression has been documented in a variety of cancers, including those that affect women. MDK mediates its effects through activation of key signaling pathways such as MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, and STAT3, which are pivotal for cell cycle progression, survival, and maintenance of stemness. Obesity and estrogen signaling, a known critical driver of women’s cancer, further elevate the levels of MDK. MDK’s effects are mediated by a variety of membrane receptors, such as integrins, protein tyrosine phosphatase ζ (PTPζ), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 2 (Notch2). Recently published studies have indicated that MDK is a potential therapeutic target and a biomarker for the progression of women’s cancer. In this review, we have provided a concise summary of the most recent papers that have examined the potential biomarker and therapeutic utility of MDK signaling in women’s cancer.

Endometrial cancer (ECa) is the most common female gynecologic cancer. When comparing the two histological subtypes of endometrial cancer, Type II tumors are biologically more aggressive and have a worse prognosis than Type I tumors. Current treatments for Type II tumors are ineffective, and new targeted therapies are urgently needed. LIFR and its ligand, LIF, have been shown to play a critical role in the progression of multiple solid cancers and therapy resistance. The role of LIF/LIFR in the progression of Type II ECa, on the other hand, is unknown. We investigated the role of LIF/LIFR signaling in Type II ECa and tested the efficacy of EC359, a novel small-molecule LIFR inhibitor, against Type II ECa. The analysis of tumor databases has uncovered a correlation between diminished survival rates and increased expression of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), suggesting a potential connection between altered LIF expression and unfavorable overall survival in Type II ECa. The results obtained from cell viability and colony formation assays demonstrated a significant decrease in the growth of Type II ECa LIFR knockdown cells in comparison to vector control cells. Furthermore, in both primary and established Type II ECa cells, pharmacological inhibition of the LIF/LIFR axis with EC359 markedly decreased cell viability, long-term cell survival, and invasion, and promoted apoptosis. Additionally, EC359 treatment reduced the activation of pathways driven by LIF/LIFR, such as AKT, mTOR, and STAT3. Tumor progression was markedly inhibited by EC359 treatment in two different patient-derived xenograft models in vivo and patient-derived organoids ex vivo. Collectively, these results suggest LIFR inhibitor EC359 as a possible new small-molecule therapeutics for the management of Type II ECa.

Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare subtype of breast cancer accounting for 7% of breast cancer-related fatalities. There is an urgent need to develop new targeted treatments for IBC. The progression of IBC has been associated with alterations in growth factor and cytokine signaling; however, the function of the LIF (leukemia inhibitory factor)/LIFR (leukemia inhibitory factor receptor) cytokine pathway in the progression of IBC remains unknown. This study evaluated the role of LIFR signaling and tested the efficacy of the LIFR inhibitor EC359 in treating IBC. Methods: The utility of using LIFR inhibition as a treatment strategy in IBC was tested using cell survival, apoptosis, colony formation, invasion, and pre-clinical KPL4 xenografts. Western blotting, siRNA, RT-qPCR, and lipid peroxidation assays were used to establish the mechanism of EC359 therapy. Results: The reduction in LIFR levels using siRNA markedly decreased growth in colony formation assays and reduced the invasion of IBC cells. Pharmacological inhibition of LIFR with EC359 effectively reduced cell survival and the clonogenic capacity of IBC cells. RT-qPCR assays revealed that EC359 markedly decreased the expression of the LIFR target genes. Western blot analyses confirmed that EC359 treatment suppressed downstream LIF/LIFR signaling pathways and promoted apoptosis. Treatment of cells with the ferroptosis inhibitor Fer-1 negated the capacity of EC359 to induce apoptosis. Mechanistic investigations demonstrated that EC359 predominantly triggered ferroptosis by inhibiting the glutathione antioxidant defense system through the downregulation of Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) levels. EC359 (5 mg/kg/day) was effective in reducing the growth of the IBC KPL4 xenograft tumors. Conclusion: These findings demonstrates that LIFR inhibition promote ferroptosis-mediated cell death in IBC and that EC359 represent novel therapeutic for IBC treatment.