Gongliang XIANG

Dr. Gongliang XIANG

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 July 2025 in Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GXGongliang XIANG
Gongliang XIANG
MTMing Tao
Ming Tao
RZRui Zhao
Rui Zhao
HGHelong Gu
Helong Gu
ZYZheng Yang
Zheng Yang

11 August 2023 in Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GXGongliang XIANG
Gongliang XIANG
MTMing Tao
Ming Tao
RZRui Zhao
Rui Zhao
HZHuatao Zhao
Huatao Zhao
CWChengqing Wu
Chengqing Wu
MMMuhammad Burhan Memon
Muhammad Burhan Memon

6 June 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMing Tao
Ming Tao
ZXZiheng Xiao
Ziheng Xiao
YLYulong Liu
Yulong Liu
LHLei Huang
Lei Huang
GXGongliang XIANG
Gongliang XIANG
YXYuanquan Xu
Yuanquan Xu
As the primary method used in open-pit mining, blasting has a direct impact on the efficiency and cost of subsequent operations. Therefore, dynamic identification of rock fragment size after blasting is essential for evaluating blasting quality and optimizing mining plans. This study presents a YOLOv8-based binocular vision model for real-time recognition of blasting fragmentation. The model is trained on a dataset comprising 1536 samples, which were annotated using an automatic labeling algorithm and expanded to 7680 samples through data augmentation techniques. The YOLOv8 instance segmentation model is employed to detect and classify rock fragments. By integrating binocular vision-based automatic image capture with Welzl’s algorithm, the actual particle size of each rock fragment is calculated. Furthermore, region of interest (ROI) extraction and shadow-based data enhancement techniques are incorporated to focus the model on the blasting fragmentation area and reduce environmental interference. Finally, software and a system were independently developed based on this integrated model and successfully deployed at engineering sites. The dynamic recognition Mean Average Precision of this integrated model is 0.84, providing a valuable reference for evaluating blasting effects and improving work efficiency.

30 April 2026 in Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YLYulong Liu
Yulong Liu
MTMing Tao
Ming Tao
LHLei Huang
Lei Huang
GXGongliang XIANG
Gongliang XIANG
YXYuanquan Xu
Yuanquan Xu
JHJiaxin He
Jiaxin He

7 October 2026 in SSRN Electronic Journal
Verified
Preprint
Open access
XZxiaoxiong zhou
xiaoxiong zhou
MTMing Tao
Ming Tao
GXGongliang XIANG
Gongliang XIANG
RZRui Zhao
Rui Zhao
ZYZheng Yang
Zheng Yang
GZGuangming Zhang
Guangming Zhang
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide an alternative framework for solving transient wave problems, but conventional PINNs tend to smooth moving wavefronts, inadequately represent asynchronous sources, and produce nonphysical responses before wave arrival. This study proposes a source aware characteristic time first order physics-informed neural network (SCT-FO PINN) for transient stress wave propagation and interaction in rock blasting under in-situ stress. For each blast hole, an independent characteristic time is introduced to explicitly represent its location, initiation time, and P wave travel time. The model jointly predicts displacement, velocity, and stress through a first order elastodynamic formulation, together with causality constraints and collocation point refinement near blast hole boundaries and moving wavefronts. Training relies only on the governing equations and prescribed initial and boundary conditions, without internal field data from analytical or numerical solutions. The framework is evaluated for static in-situ stress reconstruction, single blast hole blasting, and simultaneous and delayed dual blast hole blasting. SCT-FO PINN accurately captures stress concentrations, wavefront locations, arrival phases, and interactions between multiple blast sources. For the delayed dual blast hole case, the mean relative field error is 2.799%, while removing the characteristic time, first order formulation, or collocation refinement increases the error to 5.819%, 7.906%, and 97.340%, respectively. After training, the model generates 51 full field stress snapshots in 5.123 s on a CPU. These results demonstrate an accurate and efficient physics-informed framework for mechanical analysis of transient stress waves in rock blasting under prescribed in-situ stress conditions.

10 July 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
GXGongliang XIANG
Gongliang XIANG
MTMing Tao
Ming Tao
RZRui Zhao
Rui Zhao
HLHao Luo
Hao Luo
KDKun Du
Kun Du
KLKai Liu
Kai Liu