A new tundish design was investigated using both water model experiments and numerical simulations. The results show that the Reynolds Stress Model simulation results agree well with the Particle Image Velocimetry-measured results for water model experiments. A strong swirling flow in the Submerged Entry Nozzle (SEN) of the new tundish was successfully obtained, and the tangential velocity in the region near SEN inlet could reach a value of around 3.1 m/s. A high value of the shear stress was found to exist on the SEN wall, due to the strong swirling flow inside the SEN. This large shear stress leads to the dissipation of the rotational momentum of the steel flow. Thus, the maximum tangential velocity of the steel flow decreases from 3.1 m/s at around the SEN inlet to 2.2 m/s at a location close to the SEN outlet. In addition, the near-wall region has a high pressure, which is larger than the atmospheric pressure, due to the centrifugal effect. The calculated swirl number, with the value of around 1.6 at SEN inlet, illustrates that the current design can produce a similar strong swirling flow compared to the swirl blade method and the electromagnetic stirring method, while this is obtained by simply changing the steel flow path in tundish instead of using additional device to influence the flow.

Different sizes and shapes of nonmetallic inclusions in a swirling flow submerged entry nozzle (SEN) placed in a new tundish design were investigated by using a Lagrangian particle tracking scheme. The results show that inclusions in the current cylindrical tundish have difficulties remaining in the top tundish region, since a strong rotational steel flow exists in this region. This high rotational flow of 0.7 m/s provides the required momentum for the formation of a strong swirling flow inside the SEN. The results show that inclusions larger than 40 µm were found to deposit to a smaller extent on the SEN wall compared to smaller inclusions. The reason is that these large inclusions have Separation number values larger than 1. Thus, the swirling flow causes these large size inclusions to move toward the SEN center. For the nonspherical inclusions, large size inclusions were found to be deposited on the SEN wall to a larger extent, compared to spherical inclusions. More specifically, the difference of the deposited inclusion number is around 27 pct. Overall, it was found that the swirling flow contains three regions, namely, the isotropic core region, the anisotropic turbulence region and the near-wall region. Therefore, anisotropic turbulent fluctuations should be taken into account when the inclusion motion was tracked in this complex flow. In addition, many inclusions were found to deposit at the SEN inlet region. The plotted velocity distribution shows that the inlet flow is very chaotic. A high turbulent kinetic energy value of around 0.08 m²/s² exists in this region, and a recirculating flow was also found here. These flow characteristics are harmful since they increase the inclusion transport toward the wall. Therefore, a new design of the SEN inlet should be developed in the future, with the aim to modify the inlet flow so that the inclusion deposition is reduced.