Young Hwan Park

Dr. Young Hwan Park

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YPYoung Hwan Park
Young Hwan Park
WCWonseok Choi
Wonseok Choi
GCGi Won Choi
Gi Won Choi
HKHaK-Jun Kim
HaK-Jun Kim

19 September 2020 in Foot & Ankle International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YPYoung Hwan Park
Young Hwan Park
KJKyu Sun Jang
Kyu Sun Jang
EYEui Dong Yeo
Eui Dong Yeo
GCGi Won Choi
Gi Won Choi
HKHak Jun Kim
Hak Jun Kim
The suture anchors for the repair of deltoid ligament in rotational ankle fracture are inserted mostly into the medial malleolus, but sometimes are placed into the talus depending on the rupture site. This study sought to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of deltoid ligament repair according to using these 2 locations for suture anchor placement. The cases of 131 patients (114 patients with suture anchors on the medial malleolus and 17 patients with suture anchors on the talus) who underwent deltoid ligament repair along with ankle fracture fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Medial clear space oblique (MCSo), medial clear space perpendicular (MCSp), tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), and tibiofibular overlap (TFO) were measured as radiological outcomes, while the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain were calculated as clinical outcomes. The follow-up period did not differ between the 2 groups (16.8 ± 10.9 months in the medial malleolus group vs 17.9 ± 14.3 months in the talus group; P = .670). There were no differences in MCSo, MCSp, TFCS, and TFO at 3 months after surgery and final follow-up. The OMAS and VAS for pain did not show intergroup differences at final follow-up. The surgical outcome of deltoid ligament repair in rotational ankle fracture did not differ whether the suture anchors were inserted into the medial malleolus or into the talus. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

1 August 2022 in The Bone & Joint Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YPYoung Hwan Park
Young Hwan Park
WKWoon Kim
Woon Kim
JCJung W. Choi
Jung W. Choi
HKHaK-Jun Kim
HaK-Jun Kim
Aims: Although absorbable sutures for the repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) have been attracting attention, the rationale for their use remains insufficient. This study prospectively compared the outcomes of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for the repair of acute ATR. Methods: A total of 40 patients were randomly assigned to either braided absorbable polyglactin suture or braided nonabsorbable polyethylene terephthalate suture groups. ATR was then repaired using the Krackow suture method. At three and six months after surgery, the isokinetic muscle strength of ankle plantar flexion was measured using a computer-based Cybex dynamometer. At six and 12 months after surgery, patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS pain), and EuroQoL five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D). Results: Overall, 37 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of isokinetic plantar flexion strength, ATRS, VAS pain, or EQ-5D. No re-rupture was observed in either group. Conclusion: The use of absorbable sutures for the repair of acute ATR was not inferior to that of nonabsorbable sutures. This finding suggests that absorbable sutures can be considered for the repair of acute ATRs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):938–945.

1 October 2018 in Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YPYoung Hwan Park
Young Hwan Park
ACAn Seong Chang
An Seong Chang
GCGi Won Choi
Gi Won Choi
HKHaK-Jun Kim
HaK-Jun Kim

18 February 2019 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YPYoung Hwan Park
Young Hwan Park
TKTae Jin Kim
Tae Jin Kim
GCGi Won Choi
Gi Won Choi
HKHaK-Jun Kim
HaK-Jun Kim