He Du

Dr. He Du

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2025 in Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QRQiqiang Ren
Qiqiang Ren
TLTongsheng Liu
Tongsheng Liu
DWDongping Wan
Dongping Wan
JWJin Wang
Jin Wang
RJRongtao Jiang
Rongtao Jiang
HDHe Du
He Du

13 September 2025 in Marine and Petroleum Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHe Du
He Du
HXHuilin Xing
Huilin Xing
JFJianwei Feng
Jianwei Feng
SXShouyu Xu
Shouyu Xu

19 May 2025 in Fractal and Fractional
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QRQiqiang Ren
Qiqiang Ren
TGTianhao Gao
Tianhao Gao
RJRongtao Jiang
Rongtao Jiang
JWJin Wang
Jin Wang
MLMengping Li
Mengping Li
HDHe Du
He Du
This research introduces an innovative fractal–fractional synergy framework for multiscale analysis of stress field dynamics in geo-energy systems. By integrating fractional calculus with multiscale fractal dimension analysis, we develop a coupled approach examining stress redistribution patterns across different geological scales. The methodology combines fractal characterization of rock mechanical parameters with fractional-order stress gradient modeling, validated through integrated analysis of core testing, well logging, and seismic inversion data. Our fractal–fractional operators enable simultaneous characterization of stress memory effects and scale-invariant fracture propagation patterns. Key insights reveal the following: (1) Non-monotonic variations in rock mechanical properties (fractal dimension D = 2.31–2.67) correlate with oil–water ratio changes, exhibiting fractional-order transitional behavior. (2) Critical stress thresholds (12.19–25 MPa) for fracture activation follow fractional power-law relationships with fracture orientation deviations. (3) Fracture network evolution demonstrates dual-scale dynamics—microscale tip propagation governed by fractional stress singularities (order α = 0.63–0.78) and macroscale expansion obeying fractal growth patterns (Hurst exponent H = 0.71 ± 0.05). (4) Multiscale modeling reveals anisotropic development with fractal dimension increasing by 18–22% during multi-well fracturing operations. The fractal–fractional formalism successfully resolves the stress-shadow paradox while quantifying water channeling risks through fractional connectivity metrics. This work establishes a novel paradigm for coupled geomechanical–fluid dynamics analysis in complex reservoir systems.

9 June 2021 in Lithosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QRQiqiang Ren
Qiqiang Ren
JFJianwei Feng
Jianwei Feng
JMJi Ma
Ji Ma
HDHe Du
He Du
With an aim to increase the understanding about sedimentary environment and isotopic and chemical characteristics of fillings in fracture cavities with multiple compositions, we conducted scanning electron microscope (SEM), fluid inclusion testing (FIT), common and trace element chemistry, full analysis testing, isotopic compositions (δ13C, δ18O, 87Sr/86Sr), and apatite fission track testing to study the formation environment of Aksu area, Tarim Basin. According to outfield and microscope observations, combined with SEM results, three textural and compositional type fractures and cavities were distinguished. Through fine analysis of geochemistry characteristics on fractures, cavities, multiple filling periods, and environments were interpreted. Constrained by rare earth element (REE) pattern diagram, relationships between carbon and oxygen isotopes, strontium isotope, the compositional patterns, and generation environment of the fracture and cavities were determined. The results show that (1) cavity, fracture filling, and wall rock primarily consist of calcite, with a proportion of 56.85%, 80.48%, and 81.00%, respectively. (2) Four fracture sets have been distinguished in the Ordovician limestone of the karst cave, Middle-Late Caledonian (Set 1), Early Hercynian (Set 2), Indo-Yanshanian (Set 3), and Himalayan orogeny (Set 4). Two stages of cave filling deposition are distinguished. Stage I was coeval with the Middle-Late Caledonian Set 1 fractures and is attributable to the circulation of freshwater fluid. Stage II was coeval with the Early Hercynian Set 2 fractures and is attributable to deep hydrothermal fluid circulation. (3) Cavity, fracture filling, and wall rock in Ordovician strata are slightly influenced by diagenesis alteration and territorial supply. Three significant filling stages were distinguished, freshwater fluid with strong oxidizing environment (Middle-Late Caledonian), hydrothermal fluid with authigenic abnormal enrichment (indicating obvious hypoxic sedimentary water, Early Hercynian), and high-temperature hydrothermal fluid from deep earth (primarily influenced by magmatism, Indo-Yanshanian, and Himalayan).

20 December 2022 in Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHe Du
He Du
JFJianwei Feng
Jianwei Feng
SXShouyu Xu
Shouyu Xu
SSSuogui Shang
Suogui Shang
CLChen Li
Chen Li

1 February 2026 in Journal of Structural Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHe Du
He Du
HXHuilin Xing
Huilin Xing
JFJianwei Feng
Jianwei Feng
QRQiqiang Ren
Qiqiang Ren