Neurosurgery is regarded as the first-line treatment of acromegaly. Because of its low cure rate in macro and invasive adenoma, the role of primary medical treatment is debated. Our objective was to evaluate primary pharmacological treatment in acromegaly. We conducted an open prospective study at two Italian tertiary level centers. We studied 67 consecutive patients (36 women; age, 54.9 +/- 14.2 yr; 72% bearing macroadenoma). Individually tailored octreotide LAR (OCLAR) was administered. Outcomes included safe GH (<2.5 mug/liter), normal age-matched IGF-I levels, and tumor shrinkage. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 6-108 months), safe GH levels and normal age-matched IGF-I values were obtained by 68.7 and 70.1% of patients, respectively. Hormonal endpoints were achieved regardless of basal levels, and early results were predictive of outcome. Tumor shrank in 82.1% of patients by 62 +/- 31% (range, 0-100%), decreasing from 2101 +/- 2912 to 1010 +/- 2196 mm(3) (P < 0.0001). The higher the basal GH values and the greater the GH/IGF-I changes on treatment, the greater the tumor shrinkage. Tumor disappeared in three patients and was progressively reduced to empty sella in five patients; apparent magnetic resonance imaging cavernous sinus invasion disappeared in three. In males, testosterone increased, restoring eugonadism in 64% of hypogonadal patients. The efficacy on GH/IGF-I levels in unselected patients and the outstanding volumetric control indicate that treatment with OCLAR may be the first therapeutic approach to all acromegalic patients not amenable to surgical cure. Tumor shrinkage might also encourage the evaluation of primary OCLAR adoption in patients with initial visual field defects.

Stereotactic radiosurgery by gamma-knife (GK) is an attractive therapeutic option after failure of microsurgical removal in patients with pituitary adenoma. In these tumors or remnants of them, it aims to obtain the arrest of cell proliferation and hormone hypersecretion using a single precise high dose of ionizing radiation, sparing surrounding structures. The long-term efficacy and toxicity of GK in acromegaly are only partially known. Thirty acromegalic patients (14 women and 16 men) entered a prospective study of GK treatment. Most were surgical failures, whereas in 3 GK was the primary treatment. Imaging of the adenoma and target coordinates identification were obtained by high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were treated with multiple isocenters (mean, 8; range, 3–11). The 50% isodose was used in 27 patients (90%). The mean margin dose was 20 Gy (range, 15–35), and the dose to the visual pathways was always less than 8 Gy. After a median follow-up of 46 months (range, 9–96), IGF-I fell from 805 μg/liter (median; interquartile range, 640–994) to 460 μg/liter (interquartile range, 217–654; P = 0.0002), and normal age-matched IGF-I levels were reached in 7 patients (23%). Mean GH levels decreased from 10 μg/liter (interquartile range, 6.4–15) to 2.9 μg/liter (interquartile range, 2–5.3; P < 0.0001), reaching levels below 2.5 μg/liter in 11 (37%). The rate of persistently pathological hormonal levels was still 70% at 5 yr by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median volume was 1.43 ml (range, 0.20–3.7). Tumor shrinkage (at least 25% of basal volume) occurred after 24 months (range, 12–36) in 11 of 19 patients (58% of assessable patients). The rate of shrinkage was 79% at 4 yr. In no case was further growth observed. Only 1 patient complained of side-effects (severe headache and nausea immediately after the procedure, with full recovery in a few days with steroid therapy). Anterior pituitary failures were observed in 2 patients, who already had partial hypopituitarism, after 2 and 6 yr, respectively. No patient developed visual deficits. GK is a valid adjunctive tool in the management of acromegaly that controls GH/IGF-I hypersecretion and tumor growth, with shrinkage of adenoma and no recurrence of the disease in the considered observation period and with low acute and chronic toxicity.

Context: Surgery is a cornerstone in the treatment of acromegaly, but its efficacy in large, invasive tumors is scant. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether partial surgical removal of GH-secreting pituitary tumors enhances the response rate to somatostatin analogs (SSA; sc octreotide, slow-release octreotide, and lanreotide). Design: This was a multicenter, open, retrospective study. Setting: The study was performed at university hospitals. Subjects and Methods: Eighty-six patients (42 women and 44 men; age, 42 ± 14 yr) with acromegaly were studied. Interventions: Patients underwent two courses of octreotide, lanreotide, or slow-release octreotide treatments before and after surgery of at least 6 months. Main Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was normal IGF-I levels for age. Results: Presurgical SSA treatment significantly decreased GH and IGF-I levels in all patients. GH levels were less than 2.5 μg/liter in 12 patients (14%); IGF-I levels normalized in nine (10%). After surgery, GH and IGF-I levels further decreased in all patients; tumor removal was greater than 75% in 50 (58%), 50.1–75% in 21 (24%), 25.1–50% in 10 (12%), and less than 25% in five patients (6%). Preoperatively, pituitary function was impaired in 12 patients (14%). Postsurgical SSA treatment lowered GH levels to less than 2.5 μg/liter in 49 (56%) and normalized IGF-I levels in 48 patients (55%). The success rate was significantly increased compared with that before surgery (P < 0.0001). GH (r = −0.48; P < 0.0001) and IGF-I levels (r = −0.38; P = 0.0003) after postsurgery SSA treatment correlated with the amount of tumor surgically removed. After surgery, pituitary function was impaired in 28 patients (32.6%) and was improved in 12 patients (13.9%). The cumulative prevalence of pituitary deficiency did not change during the study (normal function from 40 to 42%; deficiency from 60 to 58%). Conclusions: Surgical tumor removal (>75%) enhances the response to SSAs without impairing pituitary function. Our data indicate that surgical debulking has a significant place in the treatment algorithm of acromegaly.

The effects of a very prolonged treatment with octreotide (OC)-long-acting repeatable (LAR) were retrospectively evaluated in 110 patients with acromegaly, showing a GH/IGF-I decrease of at least 20% vs. baseline after a short-term (6-month) OC-LAR challenge. OC-LAR was given (20 mg, im, every 28 d for 3 injections, then individually tailored) as adjuvant treatment (AT) in 59. The other 51 [primary treatment (PT)] were naive or previously treated by pharmacotherapy. IGF-I normalized in 83 patients [75%; from 770 +/- 26 (mean +/- SE) to 276 +/- 15 micro g/liter; P < 0.0001; median follow-up, 30 months; range, 18-54 months). A progressive increase in the rate of IGF-I normalization was observed. GH fell to less than 2.5 micro g/liter in 72% and to less than 1 micro g/liter in 27% (from 20.7 +/- 2.4 to 2.2 +/- 0.2 micro g/liter; P < 0.0001). PT and AT patients achieved similar final GH/IGF-I levels and rates of normalization. Patients attaining safe GH and normal IGF-I had GH levels below 5 micro g/liter after 3 months and IGF-I levels below 550 micro g/liter after 6 months. No tachyphylaxis was observed. The up-titration to 30 mg improved IGF-I suppression. Elderly patients had greater sensitivity. Tumor shrank in 46% of assessable patients, in 77% of PT patients, and in 91% of naive patients. The powerful suppression of GH/IGF-I levels without tachyphylaxis, the finding of progressive increase in the rate of IGF-I normalization and of superimposable effects in PT and AT patients, and the predictive value of short-term results support the role of PT of acromegaly with OC-LAR in at least some patients.

Vitamin D deficiency is very common and prescriptions of both assay and supplementation are increasing more and more. Health expenditure is exponentially increasing, thus it is timely and appropriate to establish rules. The Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists appointed a task force to review literature about vitamin D deficiency in adults. Four topics were identified as worthy for the practicing clinicians. For each topic recommendations based on scientific evidence and clinical practice were issued according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System. (1) What cut-off defines vitamin D deficiency: even though 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) can be considered appropriate in the general population, we recommend to maintain levels above 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) in categories at risk. (2) Whom, when, and how to perform screening for vitamin D deficiency: categories at risk (patients with bone, liver, kidney diseases, obesity, malabsorption, during pregnancy and lactation, some elderly) but not healthy people should be screened by the 25-hydroxy-vitamin D assay. (3) Whom and how to treat vitamin D deficiency: beyond healthy lifestyle (mostly sun exposure), we recommend oral vitamin D (vitamin D2 or vitamin D3) supplementation in patients treated with bone active drugs and in those with demonstrated deficiency. Dosages, molecules and modalities of administration can be profitably individually tailored. (4) How to monitor the efficacy of treatment with vitamin D: no routine monitoring is suggested during vitamin D treatment due to its large therapeutic index. In particular conditions, 25-hydroxy-vitamin D can be assayed after at least a 6-month treatment. We are confident that this document will help practicing clinicians in their daily clinical practice.