Jane Mills

Prof. Jane Mills

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 January 2006 in International Journal of Nursing Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJane Mills
Jane Mills
ABAnn Bonner
Ann Bonner
Karen FrancisKaren Francis
Karen Francis

23 May 2014 in Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSri Warsini
Sri Warsini
CWCaryn West
Caryn West
G(Grad Dip Ed (Tt)
Grad Dip Ed (Tt)
GMGrad Cert Res Meth
Grad Cert Res Meth
JMJane Mills
Jane Mills
KUKim Usher
Kim Usher
The aim of this review was to identify the psychosocial impact of natural disasters on adult (over the age of 18 years) survivors. Databases searched included PsycInfo, CINAHL, Proquest, Ovid SP, Scopus, and Science Direct. The search was limited to articles written in English and published between 2002 and 2012. A total of 1,642 abstracts and articles were obtained during the first search; 39 articles were retained. The results indicate that PTSD is the most-studied psychosocial impact after a disaster. Mental health nurses have a significant role to play in supporting survivors and can assist with the development of resilience in community members.

26 November 2009 in Collegian
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJane Mills
Jane Mills
MBMelanie Birks
Melanie Birks
DHDesley Hegney
Desley Hegney

1 January 2019 in International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMelanie Birks
Melanie Birks
KHKaren Hoare
Karen Hoare
JMJane Mills
Jane Mills
Since being developed as a research methodology in the 1960s, grounded theory (GT) has grown in popularity. In spite of its prevalence, considerable confusion surrounds GT, particularly in respect of the essential methods that characterize this approach to research. Misinformation is evident in the literature around issues such as the various approaches to GT, how long the process takes, the role of literature and preconceptions, generating and using data and strategies to produce theory. This article examines the most frequently asked questions about GT in an effort to demystify its purpose and use. Understanding the fundamental concepts of GT is critical to the correct use and application of GT methods and the ultimate production of theory that is grounded in data. More significantly, this understanding can prevent researchers encountering common pitfalls that can impede the process and impact the products of research.

1 June 2014 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAdele Baldwin
Adele Baldwin
JMJane Mills
Jane Mills
MBMelanie Birks
Melanie Birks
LBLea Budden
Lea Budden

1 June 2017 in International Journal of Nursing Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KUKim Usher
Kim Usher
CWCindy Woods
Cindy Woods
GPGlenda Parmenter
Glenda Parmenter
MHMarie Hutchinson
Marie Hutchinson
JMJudy Mannix
Judy Mannix
DJDebra Jackson
Debra Jackson
Patient safety is critical to the provision of quality health care and thus is an essential component of nurse education. To describe first, second and third year Australian undergraduate nursing students' confidence in patient safety knowledge acquired in the classroom and clinical settings across the three years of the undergraduate nursing program. A cross-sectional online survey conducted in 2015. Seven Australian universities with campuses across three states (Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia). A total of 1319 Australian undergraduate nursing students. Participants were surveyed using the 31-item Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS). Descriptive statistics summarised the sample and survey responses. Paired t-tests, ANOVA and generalized-estimating-equations models were used to compare responses across learning settings (classroom and clinical), and year of nursing course. Participants were most confident in their learning of clinical safety skills and least confident in learning about the sociocultural dimensions of working in teams with other health professionals, managing safety risks and understanding human and environmental factors. Only 59% of students felt confident they could approach someone engaging in unsafe practice, 75% of students agreed it was difficult to question the decisions or actions of those with more authority, and 78% were concerned they would face disciplinary action if they made a serious error. One patient safety subscale, Recognising and responding to remove immediate safety risks, was rated significantly higher by third year nursing students than by first and second year students. Two broader aspects of patient safety scales, Consistency in how patient safety issues are dealt with by different preceptors, and System aspects of patient safety are well covered in our program, were rated significantly higher by first year nursing students than by second and third year students. One scale, Understanding that reporting adverse events and close calls can lead to change and can reduce recurrence of events, was rated significantly higher by third year students than first and second year students. In order are to achieve meaningful improvements in patient safety, and create harm free environments for patients, it is crucial that nursing students develop confidence communicating with others to improve patient safety, particularly in the areas of challenging poor practice, and recognising, responding to and disclosing adverse events, including errors and near misses.