In response to the urgent need for rapid and precise post-disaster damage evaluation, this study introduces the Visual Prompt Damage Evaluation (ViPDE) framework, a novel contrastive learning-based approach that leverages the embedded knowledge within the Segment Anything Model (SAM) and pairs of remote sensing images to enhance building damage assessment. In this framework, we propose a learnable cascaded Visual Prompt Generator (VPG) that provides semantic visual prompts, guiding SAM to effectively analyze pre- and post-disaster image pairs and construct a nuanced representation of the affected areas at different stages. By keeping the foundation model’s parameters frozen, ViPDE significantly enhances training efficiency compared with traditional full-model fine-tuning methods. This parameter-efficient approach reduces computational costs and accelerates deployment in emergency scenarios. Moreover, our model demonstrates robustness across diverse disaster types and geographic locations. Beyond mere binary assessments, our model distinguishes damage levels with a finer granularity, categorizing them on a scale from 1 (no damage) to 4 (destroyed). Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of ViPDE, showcasing its superior performance over existing methods. Comparative evaluations demonstrate that ViPDE achieves an F1 score of 0.7014. This foundation model-based approach sets a new benchmark in disaster management. It also pioneers a new practical architectural paradigm for foundation model-based contrastive learning focused on specific objects of interest.

We present MarkMatch, a retrieval system for detecting whether two paper ballot marks were filled by the same hand. Unlike the previous SOTA method BubbleSig, which used binary classification on isolated mark pairs, MarkMatch ranks stylistic similarity between a query mark and a mark in the database using contrastive learning. Our model is trained with a dense batch similarity matrix and a dual loss objective. Each sample is contrasted against many negatives within each batch, enabling the model to learn subtle handwriting difference and improve generalization under handwriting variation and visual noise, while diagonal supervision reinforces high confidence on true matches. The model achieves an F1 score of 0.943, surpassing BubbleSig's best performance. MarkMatch also integrates Segment Anything Model for flexible mark extraction via box- or point-based prompts. The system offers election auditors a practical tool for visual, non-biometric investigation of suspicious ballots.