This study examines the use of analgesic medications among sheep farmers, highlighting both their benefits and the significant gaps in their adoption. Our findings indicate that 26.7% of sheep farmers did not utilize any analgesics, a figure that contrasts sharply with high usage rates among swine (over 80%) and cattle (over 85%) farmers. The low utilization of NSAIDs and corticosteroids in sheep farming may be attributed to inadequate education and the lack of approved indications for these medications in Greece. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between farm size and the use of NSAIDs, with larger farms using more NSAIDs, especially flunixin. Furthermore, farms with higher NSAID use—typically the larger ones—tended to have higher milk yields, suggesting that enhanced management practices may contribute to improved outcomes. The results underscore the need for targeted educational initiatives to improve the use of analgesics in sheep farming and address welfare concerns. Overall, this research highlights the importance of addressing gaps in pain management practices in the sheep farming sector to promote better animal welfare. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to expand our understanding of analgesic use and its implications for sheep welfare.

This study examines the use of analgesic medications among sheep farmers, highlighting both their benefits and significant gaps in their adoption. Our findings indicate that 26.7% of sheep farmers did not utilize any analgesics, a figure that contrasts sharply with high usage rates exceeding among farmers in swine and cattle sectors. Low utilization of NSAIDs and corticosteroids in sheep farming may be attributed to inadequate education and the absence of approved indications for these medications in Greece. Additionally, we found a positive correlation between farm size and the use of NSAIDs, with larger farms using more NSAIDs, especially flunixin. Furthermore, farms using more NSAIDs/larger farms tended to have higher milk yields, suggesting that enhanced management practices are associated with better outcomes. The results underscore the need for targeted educa-tional initiatives to improve the use of analgesics in sheep farming and address welfare concerns. Overall, this research highlights the importance of addressing gaps in pain management practices within the sheep farming sector to promote better animal welfare. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to expand our un-derstanding of analgesic use and its implications for sheep welfare.

This study examines the reproductive outcomes of Lacaune crossbred ewes and hoggets under intensive production systems, focusing on vaginal prolapse and hydrometra associated with flaws in estrus synchronization (E.S.) protocols. Data from multiple farms were combined for analysis due to the absence of significant variation at the farm level. The findings revealed a strong association between vaginal prolapse, parity, and litter size, with hoggets carrying multiple fetuses facing the highest risk (p < 0.0001). This highlights the need to reconsider equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) administration in hoggets, as it increases the likelihood of multiple pregnancies and, consequently, prolapse. Additionally, a progressive rise in hydrometra prevalence was observed with repeated synchronization cycles in ewes, increasing from 0.51% after the third treatment to 12.33% after the fourth (p < 0.0001). Notably, in this study, the four synchronization cycles were applied over a relatively short period (7.22 ± 1.64 months), further supporting concerns that excessive hormonal treatments within a compressed timeframe exacerbate reproductive dysfunction. This pattern confirms that prolonged progesterone exposure can impair uterine function, leading to fluid retention and hydrometra, as previously reported. To mitigate these risks, adjustments in synchronization protocols—such as extending the interval between successive treatments—are necessary to safeguard reproductive health and enhance animal welfare. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing estrus synchronization strategies to balance productivity with the well-being of sheep in intensive farming systems.

This study examines the reproductive outcomes of Lacaune-crossbred ewes and hoggets in intensive production systems, focusing on vaginal prolapse and hydrometra associated with flaws in estrus synchronization (E.S.) protocols. Data from multiple farms were combined for analysis due to the absence of significant variation at the farm level. The findings revealed a strong association between vaginal prolapse, parity, and litter size, with hoggets carrying multiple fetuses facing the highest risk (p < 0.0001). This highlights the need to reconsider equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) administration in hoggets, as it increases the likelihood of multiple pregnancies and, consequently, prolapse. Additionally, a progressive rise in hydrometra prevalence was observed with repeated synchronization cycles in ewes, increasing from 0.51% after the third treatment to 12.33% after the fourth (p < 0.0001). Notably, in this study, the four synchronization cycles were applied over a relatively short period (7.22 ± 1.64 months), further supporting concerns that excessive hormonal treatments within a compressed timeframe exacerbate reproductive dysfunction. The results corroborate previous reports that prolonged progesterone exposure can impair uterine function, leading to fluid retention and hydrometra. To mitigate these risks, estrus synchronization protocols should be critically reassessed—especially by extending the interval between successive treatments—to protect reproductive health and animal welfare. These findings not only underscore the need for more welfare-conscious practices in intensive sheep farming but also encourage further research aimed at refining hormonal management strategies in dairy ewe reproduction.